激素受体阳性和 HER-2 阴性转移性乳腺癌的一线内分泌治疗:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2024.14646
Yi-Cheng Jiang, Jing-Jing Yang, Hai-Tian Zhang, Rui Zhuo, Sebastian De La Roche, Luz Angela Torres-De La Roche, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Jie Dong
{"title":"激素受体阳性和 HER-2 阴性转移性乳腺癌的一线内分泌治疗:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yi-Cheng Jiang, Jing-Jing Yang, Hai-Tian Zhang, Rui Zhuo, Sebastian De La Roche, Luz Angela Torres-De La Roche, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Jie Dong","doi":"10.3892/ol.2024.14646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endocrine therapy has become the fundamental treatment option for hormone receptor-positive (HR<sup>+</sup>) and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2-negative (HER2<sup>-</sup>) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). While treatments incorporating cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitors are more prevalent than ever, comparisons among those regimens are scarce. The aim of the present study was to identify the most effective maintenance treatment for patients with HR<sup>+</sup> and HER2<sup>-</sup> mBC. To this end, databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched from inception to August, 2023. The endpoints comprised overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). For dichotomous variants, hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated, while standard mean difference (SMD) was used for consecutive variants by Bayesian network meta-analysis to make pairwise comparisons among regimens, to determine the optimal therapy. These processes were conducted using Rstudio 4.2.2 orchestrated with STATA 17.0 MP. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials including 7,174 patients with 11 interventions were analyzed. Compared with aromatase inhibitor (AI), palbociclib plus AI (PalboAI) exhibited a significantly longer PFS up to the 36th month of follow-up [HR=1.7; 95% credible interval, 1.36-2.16], including on the 3rd [OR=2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-4.47], 6th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.69), 12th (OR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.34-2.79), 18th (OR=2.38; 95% CI, 1.65-3.44), 24th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.67-3.43), 30th (OR=2.10; 95% CI, 1.62-2.74) and 36th (OR=2.66; 95% CI, 1.37-5.18) month of follow-up. Additionally, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant exhibited significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 36 months. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus AI and dalpiciclib plus AI exerted significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 30 months. Considering the effect on OS and PFS together with adverse reactions, safety, medical compliance and route of administration, PalboAI was found to be the optimal treatment for HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup>mBC. However, additional head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First‑line endocrine therapy for hormone receptor positive and HER‑2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta‑analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Cheng Jiang, Jing-Jing Yang, Hai-Tian Zhang, Rui Zhuo, Sebastian De La Roche, Luz Angela Torres-De La Roche, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Jie Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/ol.2024.14646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endocrine therapy has become the fundamental treatment option for hormone receptor-positive (HR<sup>+</sup>) and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2-negative (HER2<sup>-</sup>) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). While treatments incorporating cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitors are more prevalent than ever, comparisons among those regimens are scarce. The aim of the present study was to identify the most effective maintenance treatment for patients with HR<sup>+</sup> and HER2<sup>-</sup> mBC. To this end, databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched from inception to August, 2023. The endpoints comprised overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). For dichotomous variants, hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated, while standard mean difference (SMD) was used for consecutive variants by Bayesian network meta-analysis to make pairwise comparisons among regimens, to determine the optimal therapy. These processes were conducted using Rstudio 4.2.2 orchestrated with STATA 17.0 MP. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials including 7,174 patients with 11 interventions were analyzed. Compared with aromatase inhibitor (AI), palbociclib plus AI (PalboAI) exhibited a significantly longer PFS up to the 36th month of follow-up [HR=1.7; 95% credible interval, 1.36-2.16], including on the 3rd [OR=2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-4.47], 6th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.69), 12th (OR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.34-2.79), 18th (OR=2.38; 95% CI, 1.65-3.44), 24th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.67-3.43), 30th (OR=2.10; 95% CI, 1.62-2.74) and 36th (OR=2.66; 95% CI, 1.37-5.18) month of follow-up. Additionally, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant exhibited significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 36 months. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus AI and dalpiciclib plus AI exerted significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 30 months. Considering the effect on OS and PFS together with adverse reactions, safety, medical compliance and route of administration, PalboAI was found to be the optimal treatment for HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup>mBC. However, additional head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内分泌治疗已成为激素受体阳性(HR+)和受体酪氨酸蛋白激酶erbB-2阴性(HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)的基本治疗方案。虽然含有细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4和6抑制剂的治疗方法比以往任何时候都更加普遍,但这些治疗方案之间的比较却很少。本研究旨在确定对HR+和HER2- mBC患者最有效的维持治疗方法。为此,研究人员检索了从开始到2023年8月的数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Google Scholar。研究终点包括总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析法,对二分变异产生危险比(HRs)和几率比(ORs),对连续变异使用标准平均差(SMD)对不同疗法进行配对比较,以确定最佳疗法。这些过程使用 Rstudio 4.2.2 和 STATA 17.0 MP 协调进行。共分析了 16 项随机对照试验,包括 7,174 名患者和 11 项干预措施。与芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)相比,帕博西尼(palbociclib)加AI(PalboAI)在随访至第36个月时的PFS明显更长[HR=1.7;95%可信区间,1.36-2.16],包括第3个月[OR=2.22;95%可信区间(CI),1.10-4.47]、第6个月(OR=2.39;95% CI,1.21-4.69)、第12个月(OR=1.94;95% CI,1.34-2.79)、第18个月(OR=2.38;95% CI,1.65-3.44)、第24个月(OR=2.39;95% CI,1.67-3.43)、第30个月(OR=2.10;95% CI,1.62-2.74)和第36个月(OR=2.66;95% CI,1.37-5.18)。此外,在12个月至36个月期间,阿柏西尼加氟维司群与单用AI相比具有显著效果。在12至30个月期间,Ribociclib加氟维司群、ribociclib加AI和dalpiciclib加AI与单用AI相比具有显著疗效。考虑到对OS和PFS的影响以及不良反应、安全性、医疗依从性和给药途径,PalboAI被认为是治疗HR+/HER2-mBC的最佳疗法。不过,还需要更多的头对头临床试验来证实这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First‑line endocrine therapy for hormone receptor positive and HER‑2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta‑analysis.

Endocrine therapy has become the fundamental treatment option for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). While treatments incorporating cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitors are more prevalent than ever, comparisons among those regimens are scarce. The aim of the present study was to identify the most effective maintenance treatment for patients with HR+ and HER2- mBC. To this end, databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched from inception to August, 2023. The endpoints comprised overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). For dichotomous variants, hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated, while standard mean difference (SMD) was used for consecutive variants by Bayesian network meta-analysis to make pairwise comparisons among regimens, to determine the optimal therapy. These processes were conducted using Rstudio 4.2.2 orchestrated with STATA 17.0 MP. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials including 7,174 patients with 11 interventions were analyzed. Compared with aromatase inhibitor (AI), palbociclib plus AI (PalboAI) exhibited a significantly longer PFS up to the 36th month of follow-up [HR=1.7; 95% credible interval, 1.36-2.16], including on the 3rd [OR=2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-4.47], 6th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.21-4.69), 12th (OR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.34-2.79), 18th (OR=2.38; 95% CI, 1.65-3.44), 24th (OR=2.39; 95% CI, 1.67-3.43), 30th (OR=2.10; 95% CI, 1.62-2.74) and 36th (OR=2.66; 95% CI, 1.37-5.18) month of follow-up. Additionally, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant exhibited significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 36 months. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus AI and dalpiciclib plus AI exerted significant effects compared with AI alone between 12 and 30 months. Considering the effect on OS and PFS together with adverse reactions, safety, medical compliance and route of administration, PalboAI was found to be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2-mBC. However, additional head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信