在姑息关怀服务模式和预先关怀规划研究中实施以患者为中心的结果研究所利益相关者参与原则。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025
Anne M Walling, Manisha Verma, Corita R Grudzen, Susan Enguidanos, Nadine J Barrett, Kimberly S Johnson, Angela K Combe, Fabian M Johnston, Joseph A Greer
{"title":"在姑息关怀服务模式和预先关怀规划研究中实施以患者为中心的结果研究所利益相关者参与原则。","authors":"Anne M Walling, Manisha Verma, Corita R Grudzen, Susan Enguidanos, Nadine J Barrett, Kimberly S Johnson, Angela K Combe, Fabian M Johnston, Joseph A Greer","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the many challenges of conducting research that addresses the palliative and end-of-life care needs of patients with serious illnesses, stakeholder engagement starting from the moment of study conceptualization and design is critical to ensure successful participant recruitment, data collection, intervention delivery, data analysis, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by a conceptual model published by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) entitled, \"Measuring What Matters for Advancing the Science and Practice of Engagement\"14 and with the support of a PCORI Engagement Officer, representatives from 9 PCORI-funded study teams formed a working group to survey team members and review, outline, and describe key lessons learned and best practices for promoting stakeholder engagement in palliative care research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost all study teams engaged with patients/caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and health care system experts as stakeholder partners. About half the teams also included payers and training institutions as part of their stakeholder advisors as well as a range of content experts. Study teams relied on a variety of support structures and resources, and they employed 10 distinct methods for maintaining engagement. All engagement methods were generally considered to be effective by teams who used the method, though there was some variability in team-rated engagement quality of each method. Nine barriers to stakeholder engagement were identified across the 9 studies as well as 9 strategies (or facilitators) to overcome these barriers. We share examples of how stakeholder engagement impacted studies in all phases, including the preparatory phase, study initiation phase, execution phase, and data analysis/dissemination phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teams utilized a variety of resources and support structures as well as capitalized on multiple engagement methods for fostering stakeholder engagement, resulting in a high level of collaboration and integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research.\",\"authors\":\"Anne M Walling, Manisha Verma, Corita R Grudzen, Susan Enguidanos, Nadine J Barrett, Kimberly S Johnson, Angela K Combe, Fabian M Johnston, Joseph A Greer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the many challenges of conducting research that addresses the palliative and end-of-life care needs of patients with serious illnesses, stakeholder engagement starting from the moment of study conceptualization and design is critical to ensure successful participant recruitment, data collection, intervention delivery, data analysis, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by a conceptual model published by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) entitled, \\\"Measuring What Matters for Advancing the Science and Practice of Engagement\\\"14 and with the support of a PCORI Engagement Officer, representatives from 9 PCORI-funded study teams formed a working group to survey team members and review, outline, and describe key lessons learned and best practices for promoting stakeholder engagement in palliative care research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost all study teams engaged with patients/caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and health care system experts as stakeholder partners. About half the teams also included payers and training institutions as part of their stakeholder advisors as well as a range of content experts. Study teams relied on a variety of support structures and resources, and they employed 10 distinct methods for maintaining engagement. All engagement methods were generally considered to be effective by teams who used the method, though there was some variability in team-rated engagement quality of each method. Nine barriers to stakeholder engagement were identified across the 9 studies as well as 9 strategies (or facilitators) to overcome these barriers. We share examples of how stakeholder engagement impacted studies in all phases, including the preparatory phase, study initiation phase, execution phase, and data analysis/dissemination phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teams utilized a variety of resources and support structures as well as capitalized on multiple engagement methods for fostering stakeholder engagement, resulting in a high level of collaboration and integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于开展针对重病患者姑息治疗和临终关怀需求的研究面临诸多挑战,利益相关者从研究构思和设计之初就开始参与,对于确保成功招募参与者、收集数据、提供干预措施、分析数据和传播至关重要:在以患者为中心的结果研究所(PCORI)发布的概念模型 "衡量促进参与的科学与实践的重要因素 "14 的指导下,并在 PCORI 参与官的支持下,来自 9 个 PCORI 资助研究团队的代表组成了一个工作组,对团队成员进行调查,并回顾、概述和描述在姑息关怀研究中促进利益相关者参与的主要经验和最佳实践:几乎所有的研究团队都将患者/护理者、临床医生、研究人员和医疗保健系统专家作为利益相关者的合作伙伴。约有一半的研究团队还将付款人和培训机构以及一系列内容专家作为利益相关者顾问的一部分。研究团队依靠各种支持结构和资源,并采用了 10 种不同的方法来保持参与度。使用过这些方法的团队普遍认为所有参与方法都是有效的,尽管团队对每种方法的参与质量评价存在一定差异。在这 9 项研究中,我们发现了利益相关者参与的 9 个障碍,以及克服这些障碍的 9 个策略(或促进因素)。我们分享了利益相关者参与如何影响各阶段研究的实例,包括准备阶段、研究启动阶段、执行阶段和数据分析/发布阶段:各团队利用各种资源和支持结构,并采用多种参与方法促进利益相关者的参与,从而实现了高度的合作与整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research.

Background: Given the many challenges of conducting research that addresses the palliative and end-of-life care needs of patients with serious illnesses, stakeholder engagement starting from the moment of study conceptualization and design is critical to ensure successful participant recruitment, data collection, intervention delivery, data analysis, and dissemination.

Methods: Guided by a conceptual model published by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) entitled, "Measuring What Matters for Advancing the Science and Practice of Engagement"14 and with the support of a PCORI Engagement Officer, representatives from 9 PCORI-funded study teams formed a working group to survey team members and review, outline, and describe key lessons learned and best practices for promoting stakeholder engagement in palliative care research.

Results: Almost all study teams engaged with patients/caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and health care system experts as stakeholder partners. About half the teams also included payers and training institutions as part of their stakeholder advisors as well as a range of content experts. Study teams relied on a variety of support structures and resources, and they employed 10 distinct methods for maintaining engagement. All engagement methods were generally considered to be effective by teams who used the method, though there was some variability in team-rated engagement quality of each method. Nine barriers to stakeholder engagement were identified across the 9 studies as well as 9 strategies (or facilitators) to overcome these barriers. We share examples of how stakeholder engagement impacted studies in all phases, including the preparatory phase, study initiation phase, execution phase, and data analysis/dissemination phase.

Conclusions: Teams utilized a variety of resources and support structures as well as capitalized on multiple engagement methods for fostering stakeholder engagement, resulting in a high level of collaboration and integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信