澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中有关性和性别的收集、分析和报告政策:一项混合方法研究。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cheryl Carcel, Amy Vassallo, Laura Hallam, Janani Shanthosh, Kelly Thompson, Lily Halliday, Jacek Anderst, Anthony KJ Smith, Briar L McKenzie, Christy E Newman, Keziah Bennett-Brook, Zoe Wainer, Mark Woodward, Robyn Norton, Louise Chappell
{"title":"澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中有关性和性别的收集、分析和报告政策:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Cheryl Carcel,&nbsp;Amy Vassallo,&nbsp;Laura Hallam,&nbsp;Janani Shanthosh,&nbsp;Kelly Thompson,&nbsp;Lily Halliday,&nbsp;Jacek Anderst,&nbsp;Anthony KJ Smith,&nbsp;Briar L McKenzie,&nbsp;Christy E Newman,&nbsp;Keziah Bennett-Brook,&nbsp;Zoe Wainer,&nbsp;Mark Woodward,&nbsp;Robyn Norton,&nbsp;Louise Chappell","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the policies of key organisations in Australian health and medical research on defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data on sex and gender, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of developing and implementing such policies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Mixed methods study: online planning forum; survey of organisations in Australian health and medical research, and internet search for policies defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data by sex and gender in health and medical research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>Australia, 19 May 2021 (planning forum) to 12 December 2022 (final internet search).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Relevant webpages and documents classified as dedicated organisation-specific sex and gender policies; policies, guidelines, or statements with broader aims, but including content that met the definition of a sex and gender policy; and references to external policies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The online planning forum identified 65 relevant organisations in Australian health and medical research; twenty participated in the policy survey. Seven organisations reported at least one relevant policy, and six had plans to develop or implement such policies during the following two years. Barriers to and facilitators of policy development and implementation were identified in the areas of leadership, language and definitions, and knowledge skills and training. The internet search found that 57 of the 65 organisations had some form of sex and gender policy, including all ten peer-reviewed journals and five of ten research funders; twelve organisations, including eight peak body organisations, had published dedicated sex and gender policies on their websites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Most of the organisations included in our study had policies regarding the integration of sex and gender in health and medical research. The implementation and evaluation of these policies is necessary to ensure that consideration of sex and gender is adequate during all stages of the research process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policies on the collection, analysis, and reporting of sex and gender in Australian health and medical research: a mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Carcel,&nbsp;Amy Vassallo,&nbsp;Laura Hallam,&nbsp;Janani Shanthosh,&nbsp;Kelly Thompson,&nbsp;Lily Halliday,&nbsp;Jacek Anderst,&nbsp;Anthony KJ Smith,&nbsp;Briar L McKenzie,&nbsp;Christy E Newman,&nbsp;Keziah Bennett-Brook,&nbsp;Zoe Wainer,&nbsp;Mark Woodward,&nbsp;Robyn Norton,&nbsp;Louise Chappell\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the policies of key organisations in Australian health and medical research on defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data on sex and gender, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of developing and implementing such policies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mixed methods study: online planning forum; survey of organisations in Australian health and medical research, and internet search for policies defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data by sex and gender in health and medical research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Australia, 19 May 2021 (planning forum) to 12 December 2022 (final internet search).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Relevant webpages and documents classified as dedicated organisation-specific sex and gender policies; policies, guidelines, or statements with broader aims, but including content that met the definition of a sex and gender policy; and references to external policies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The online planning forum identified 65 relevant organisations in Australian health and medical research; twenty participated in the policy survey. Seven organisations reported at least one relevant policy, and six had plans to develop or implement such policies during the following two years. Barriers to and facilitators of policy development and implementation were identified in the areas of leadership, language and definitions, and knowledge skills and training. The internet search found that 57 of the 65 organisations had some form of sex and gender policy, including all ten peer-reviewed journals and five of ten research funders; twelve organisations, including eight peak body organisations, had published dedicated sex and gender policies on their websites.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most of the organisations included in our study had policies regarding the integration of sex and gender in health and medical research. The implementation and evaluation of these policies is necessary to ensure that consideration of sex and gender is adequate during all stages of the research process.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52435\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探索澳大利亚健康和医学研究领域主要组织关于定义、收集、分析和报告性与性别数据的政策,并确定制定和实施此类政策的障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究:在线规划论坛;对澳大利亚卫生和医学研究机构进行调查,并在互联网上搜索在卫生和医学研究中按性别定义、收集、分析和报告数据的政策:澳大利亚,2021 年 5 月 19 日(规划论坛)至 2022 年 12 月 12 日(最终互联网搜索):被归类为专门针对特定组织的性与性别政策的相关网页和文件;具有更广泛目标但包含符合性与性别政策定义的内容的政策、指南或声明;以及外部政策参考:在线规划论坛确定了澳大利亚健康和医学研究领域的 65 家相关组织;20 家参与了政策调查。7 家机构报告至少有一项相关政策,6 家机构计划在未来两年内制定或实施此类政策。在领导力、语言和定义以及知识技能和培训方面,确定了政策制定和实施的障碍和促进因素。互联网搜索发现,65 家机构中有 57 家制定了某种形式的性与性别政策,包括所有 10 家同行评审期刊和 10 家研究资助机构中的 5 家;12 家机构(包括 8 家高峰机构)在其网站上发布了专门的性与性别政策:结论:我们研究中的大多数组织都制定了将性与性别问题纳入健康和医学研究的政策。有必要对这些政策进行实施和评估,以确保在研究过程的各个阶段都充分考虑到性和性别问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Policies on the collection, analysis, and reporting of sex and gender in Australian health and medical research: a mixed methods study

Policies on the collection, analysis, and reporting of sex and gender in Australian health and medical research: a mixed methods study

Objective

To explore the policies of key organisations in Australian health and medical research on defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data on sex and gender, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of developing and implementing such policies.

Study design

Mixed methods study: online planning forum; survey of organisations in Australian health and medical research, and internet search for policies defining, collecting, analysing, and reporting data by sex and gender in health and medical research.

Setting, participants

Australia, 19 May 2021 (planning forum) to 12 December 2022 (final internet search).

Main outcome measures

Relevant webpages and documents classified as dedicated organisation-specific sex and gender policies; policies, guidelines, or statements with broader aims, but including content that met the definition of a sex and gender policy; and references to external policies.

Results

The online planning forum identified 65 relevant organisations in Australian health and medical research; twenty participated in the policy survey. Seven organisations reported at least one relevant policy, and six had plans to develop or implement such policies during the following two years. Barriers to and facilitators of policy development and implementation were identified in the areas of leadership, language and definitions, and knowledge skills and training. The internet search found that 57 of the 65 organisations had some form of sex and gender policy, including all ten peer-reviewed journals and five of ten research funders; twelve organisations, including eight peak body organisations, had published dedicated sex and gender policies on their websites.

Conclusion

Most of the organisations included in our study had policies regarding the integration of sex and gender in health and medical research. The implementation and evaluation of these policies is necessary to ensure that consideration of sex and gender is adequate during all stages of the research process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信