口腔健康纵向观察研究中的因果分析:范围综述。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
An T M Dao, Loc G Do, Nicole Stormon, Manori Dhanapriyanka, Diep H Ha
{"title":"口腔健康纵向观察研究中的因果分析:范围综述。","authors":"An T M Dao, Loc G Do, Nicole Stormon, Manori Dhanapriyanka, Diep H Ha","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Causal analysis including causal inference and causal mediation is pivotal to inform effective interventions. In modern epidemilogy, causal analysis involves four key steps: formulating causal questions, employing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), conducting data management and selecting statistical strategies. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to assess how longitudinal observational studies (LOSs) in dental field have integrated these four steps to contribute leverage evidence that inform oral public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LOSs focusing on determinants of dental caries published from 2012 to 2024 were systematically retrieved from five major databases. The Joanna Briggs Institute-scoping review guidance and the Covidence application were employed to identify eligible LOSs for being reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 85 eligible LOSs, none formulated causal hypothesis by applying 'what if' question or investigated mediation across three levels of the determinants of oral health. A minority (18 studies, ~21.2%) employed DAGs to visualise relationships among study variables, while only one third (33 studies, ~39%) clearly defined confounders. The majority (64 studies, ~75%) incorporated a time-varying feature of their data, yet only a few (11 studies) fully leveraged this advanced aspect. Among these studies that fully utilised time-varying data, more than half encountered challenges in employing robust statistics to address confounders arising from such data dynamics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental LOSs have, to date, mostly focused on investigating associations over causality, often neglecting the four-step causal analysis and not fully utilising time-varying data. Researchers necessitate to shift their focus to causal inference and prioritise building capacity in causal analysis with a consistent four-step approach to advance the field. Studies exploring mechanisms linking determinants of dental caries across levels and leveraging time-varying data are strongly encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal analyses in longitudinal observational studies in oral health: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"An T M Dao, Loc G Do, Nicole Stormon, Manori Dhanapriyanka, Diep H Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdoe.13002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Causal analysis including causal inference and causal mediation is pivotal to inform effective interventions. In modern epidemilogy, causal analysis involves four key steps: formulating causal questions, employing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), conducting data management and selecting statistical strategies. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to assess how longitudinal observational studies (LOSs) in dental field have integrated these four steps to contribute leverage evidence that inform oral public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LOSs focusing on determinants of dental caries published from 2012 to 2024 were systematically retrieved from five major databases. The Joanna Briggs Institute-scoping review guidance and the Covidence application were employed to identify eligible LOSs for being reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 85 eligible LOSs, none formulated causal hypothesis by applying 'what if' question or investigated mediation across three levels of the determinants of oral health. A minority (18 studies, ~21.2%) employed DAGs to visualise relationships among study variables, while only one third (33 studies, ~39%) clearly defined confounders. The majority (64 studies, ~75%) incorporated a time-varying feature of their data, yet only a few (11 studies) fully leveraged this advanced aspect. Among these studies that fully utilised time-varying data, more than half encountered challenges in employing robust statistics to address confounders arising from such data dynamics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental LOSs have, to date, mostly focused on investigating associations over causality, often neglecting the four-step causal analysis and not fully utilising time-varying data. Researchers necessitate to shift their focus to causal inference and prioritise building capacity in causal analysis with a consistent four-step approach to advance the field. Studies exploring mechanisms linking determinants of dental caries across levels and leveraging time-varying data are strongly encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:因果分析(包括因果推断和因果中介)对于提供有效的干预措施至关重要。在现代流行病学中,因果分析包括四个关键步骤:提出因果问题、使用有向无环图(DAG)、进行数据管理和选择统计策略。我们的目标是进行一次范围综述,以评估牙科领域的纵向观察研究(LOSs)如何整合这四个步骤,从而为口腔公共卫生干预提供有利证据:从五个主要数据库中系统地检索了 2012 年至 2024 年间发表的关注龋齿决定因素的纵向观察研究。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)范围审查指南和 Covidence 应用程序来确定符合审查条件的 LOS:结果:在 85 项符合条件的 LOSs 中,没有一项通过 "如果 "问题提出因果假设,也没有一项调查了口腔健康决定因素三个层面的中介作用。少数研究(18 项研究,约占 21.2%)采用 DAG 来直观显示研究变量之间的关系,只有三分之一的研究(33 项研究,约占 39%)明确定义了混杂因素。大多数研究(64 项研究,约占 75%)在数据中加入了时变特征,但只有少数研究(11 项研究)充分利用了这一先进特征。在这些充分利用了时变数据的研究中,有一半以上的研究在采用稳健的统计方法来处理此类数据动态所产生的混杂因素方面遇到了挑战:结论:迄今为止,牙科 LOS 大多侧重于研究关联性而非因果性,往往忽视了四步因果分析法,也没有充分利用时变数据。研究人员有必要将重点转移到因果推断上,并优先建设因果分析能力,采用一致的四步方法来推动该领域的发展。强烈鼓励开展研究,探索龋齿决定因素在不同层面的关联机制,并充分利用时变数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal analyses in longitudinal observational studies in oral health: A scoping review.

Objective: Causal analysis including causal inference and causal mediation is pivotal to inform effective interventions. In modern epidemilogy, causal analysis involves four key steps: formulating causal questions, employing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), conducting data management and selecting statistical strategies. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to assess how longitudinal observational studies (LOSs) in dental field have integrated these four steps to contribute leverage evidence that inform oral public health interventions.

Methods: LOSs focusing on determinants of dental caries published from 2012 to 2024 were systematically retrieved from five major databases. The Joanna Briggs Institute-scoping review guidance and the Covidence application were employed to identify eligible LOSs for being reviewed.

Results: Out of the 85 eligible LOSs, none formulated causal hypothesis by applying 'what if' question or investigated mediation across three levels of the determinants of oral health. A minority (18 studies, ~21.2%) employed DAGs to visualise relationships among study variables, while only one third (33 studies, ~39%) clearly defined confounders. The majority (64 studies, ~75%) incorporated a time-varying feature of their data, yet only a few (11 studies) fully leveraged this advanced aspect. Among these studies that fully utilised time-varying data, more than half encountered challenges in employing robust statistics to address confounders arising from such data dynamics.

Conclusions: Dental LOSs have, to date, mostly focused on investigating associations over causality, often neglecting the four-step causal analysis and not fully utilising time-varying data. Researchers necessitate to shift their focus to causal inference and prioritise building capacity in causal analysis with a consistent four-step approach to advance the field. Studies exploring mechanisms linking determinants of dental caries across levels and leveraging time-varying data are strongly encouraged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信