美国 FDA 批准摘要:贝祖替凡用于晚期肾细胞癌患者。

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman
{"title":"美国 FDA 批准摘要:贝祖替凡用于晚期肾细胞癌患者。","authors":"Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On December 14, 2023, the U.S. FDA approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following treatment with both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [HR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.90; one-sided P value = 0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected nonproportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-5.8) in the everolimus arm. Although not reaching full maturity, the overall survival results seemed to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.07). The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 22% and 3.6% in the belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared with everolimus.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":"5003-5008"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Jaleh Fallah, Brian L Heiss, Hee-Koung Joeng, Chana Weinstock, Xin Gao, William F Pierce, Benjamin Chukwurah, Vishal Bhatnagar, Mallorie H Fiero, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Richard Pazdur, Paul G Kluetz, Daniel L Suzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>On December 14, 2023, the U.S. FDA approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following treatment with both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [HR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.90; one-sided P value = 0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected nonproportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-5.8) in the everolimus arm. Although not reaching full maturity, the overall survival results seemed to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.07). The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 22% and 3.6% in the belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared with everolimus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5003-5008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年12月14日,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准belzutifan(Welireg,默克公司)用于接受过程序性死亡受体-1或程序性死亡配体1(PD-1/PD-L1)抑制剂和血管内皮生长因子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGF-TKI)治疗的晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者。FDA根据LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750)授予了传统批准,LITESPARK-005是一项开放标签、随机、头对头试验,对746名同时使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂和VEGF-TKI后病情进展的晚期RCC患者进行了试验。患者随机(1:1)接受贝珠单抗或依维莫司治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),由盲法独立中央审查(BICR)评估。与依维莫司相比,贝珠单抗的无进展生存期有明显的统计学改善[危险比 (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.90);单侧 p 值=0.0008]。Kaplan-Meier曲线反映了非比例危险,中位PFS估计值相似,贝珠替凡治疗组为5.6个月(95% CI:3.9,7.0),依维莫司治疗组为5.6个月(95% CI:4.8,5.8)。虽然尚未完全成熟,但与依维莫司相比,belzutifan治疗组的OS结果似乎显示出有利趋势[HR=0.88(95% CI:0.73,1.07)]。贝珠单抗和依维莫司治疗组的BICR证实客观反应率分别为22%和3.6%。治疗组之间观察到的毒性有所不同,但与依维莫司治疗组相比,贝珠替凡治疗组因治疗引起的不良事件而停药和中断治疗的比例较低,对患者报告的症状和功能结果进行的描述性分析表明,贝珠替凡的耐受性优于依维莫司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

On December 14, 2023, the U.S. FDA approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following treatment with both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [HR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.90; one-sided P value = 0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected nonproportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-5.8) in the everolimus arm. Although not reaching full maturity, the overall survival results seemed to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.07). The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 22% and 3.6% in the belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared with everolimus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信