纳米颗粒和纳米固体之间由边缘和顶点引起的差异:面心立方铝的密度泛函理论研究

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"纳米颗粒和纳米固体之间由边缘和顶点引起的差异:面心立方铝的密度泛函理论研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids cannot be clearly distinguished energetically using conventional comparisons based on the surface energies of these species. For example, nanoparticles and nanovoids with the same volume and shape are considered energetically equivalent to the conventional Wulff construction, and so the difference in their morphology cannot be evaluated. This can be attributed to fact that using such approaches, the effects of excess defects, edges, and vertices in nanoparticles and nanovoids are typically ignored. In this study, we investigated the energetic differences between face-centered-cubic (FCC) nanoparticles of Al and nanovoids in bulk FCC Al structure with conventional truncated octahedral shapes by calculating the excess energies attributed to their edges, vertices, and sizes. This was achieved using density functional theory calculations and our previously reported method for evaluating the effects of edges and vertices. The morphological differences between the nanoparticles and nanovoids were also discussed based on the obtained results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10650,"journal":{"name":"Computational Materials Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624005639/pdfft?md5=8362709c8268b5336550578642624288&pid=1-s2.0-S0927025624005639-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Edge- and vertex-originated differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids: A density functional theory study of face-centered-cubic Al\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids cannot be clearly distinguished energetically using conventional comparisons based on the surface energies of these species. For example, nanoparticles and nanovoids with the same volume and shape are considered energetically equivalent to the conventional Wulff construction, and so the difference in their morphology cannot be evaluated. This can be attributed to fact that using such approaches, the effects of excess defects, edges, and vertices in nanoparticles and nanovoids are typically ignored. In this study, we investigated the energetic differences between face-centered-cubic (FCC) nanoparticles of Al and nanovoids in bulk FCC Al structure with conventional truncated octahedral shapes by calculating the excess energies attributed to their edges, vertices, and sizes. This was achieved using density functional theory calculations and our previously reported method for evaluating the effects of edges and vertices. The morphological differences between the nanoparticles and nanovoids were also discussed based on the obtained results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Materials Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624005639/pdfft?md5=8362709c8268b5336550578642624288&pid=1-s2.0-S0927025624005639-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624005639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624005639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用基于这些物种表面能的传统比较方法,无法从能量上明确区分纳米粒子和纳米原形体之间的差异。例如,按照传统的 Wulff 结构,具有相同体积和形状的纳米颗粒和纳米实体在能量上是等价的,因此无法评估它们形态上的差异。这可能是因为使用这种方法时,通常会忽略纳米粒子和纳米实体中多余缺陷、边缘和顶点的影响。在本研究中,我们通过计算边缘、顶点和尺寸的过剩能量,研究了面心立方(FCC)纳米铝粒子与具有传统截断八面体形状的块状 FCC Al 结构中的纳米实体之间的能量差异。这是利用密度泛函理论计算和我们之前报告的评估边缘和顶点影响的方法实现的。根据所获得的结果,还讨论了纳米颗粒和纳米固体之间的形态差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Edge- and vertex-originated differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids: A density functional theory study of face-centered-cubic Al

Edge- and vertex-originated differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids: A density functional theory study of face-centered-cubic Al

The differences between nanoparticles and nanovoids cannot be clearly distinguished energetically using conventional comparisons based on the surface energies of these species. For example, nanoparticles and nanovoids with the same volume and shape are considered energetically equivalent to the conventional Wulff construction, and so the difference in their morphology cannot be evaluated. This can be attributed to fact that using such approaches, the effects of excess defects, edges, and vertices in nanoparticles and nanovoids are typically ignored. In this study, we investigated the energetic differences between face-centered-cubic (FCC) nanoparticles of Al and nanovoids in bulk FCC Al structure with conventional truncated octahedral shapes by calculating the excess energies attributed to their edges, vertices, and sizes. This was achieved using density functional theory calculations and our previously reported method for evaluating the effects of edges and vertices. The morphological differences between the nanoparticles and nanovoids were also discussed based on the obtained results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Materials Science
Computational Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
665
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The goal of Computational Materials Science is to report on results that provide new or unique insights into, or significantly expand our understanding of, the properties of materials or phenomena associated with their design, synthesis, processing, characterization, and utilization. To be relevant to the journal, the results should be applied or applicable to specific material systems that are discussed within the submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信