节点与链路攻击下城市地下物流系统的弹性量化与恢复策略模拟:南京市案例研究

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ying Lu, Qingling Wang, Shiyu Huang, Wenhui Yu, Shuyue Yao
{"title":"节点与链路攻击下城市地下物流系统的弹性量化与恢复策略模拟:南京市案例研究","authors":"Ying Lu,&nbsp;Qingling Wang,&nbsp;Shiyu Huang,&nbsp;Wenhui Yu,&nbsp;Shuyue Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban Underground Logistics Systems (UULS) have become an emerging solution to mitigate urban surface traffic congestion, environmental pollution, and surface transport safety risks. However, during the operation of UULS, the use of advanced technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) introduces cybersecurity risks to the system. Moreover, severe natural disasters can also cause damage to underground transportation network links. Existing research and planning primarily concentrate on the system design and benefits of UULS, neglecting the system's service level under attack scenarios. This study outlines three representative UULS network prototypes and proposes a resilience quantification method centered on logistics efficiency. It also focuses on comparing the effectiveness of three recovery strategies. These strategies give priority to maximum flow, betweenness centrality, and regional importance, as well as the priority of node and link repairs. The resilience quantification method and recovery strategies are applied in a case study set in Nanjing City. The case study results reveal that the Two-echelon network shows exceptional resilience. Regarding the effectiveness of recovery strategies, the strategy based on maximum flow proves to be the most effective, and focusing on node repair can lead to higher system resilience. Based on these findings, this study offers recommendations to transportation and logistics management decision-makers, focusing on UULS resilience and recovery strategy selection. These recommendations are intended to provide valuable guidance for the planning and design of future UULS, ensuring their resilience and reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience quantification and recovery strategy simulation for urban underground logistics systems under node and link attacks: A case study of Nanjing city\",\"authors\":\"Ying Lu,&nbsp;Qingling Wang,&nbsp;Shiyu Huang,&nbsp;Wenhui Yu,&nbsp;Shuyue Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urban Underground Logistics Systems (UULS) have become an emerging solution to mitigate urban surface traffic congestion, environmental pollution, and surface transport safety risks. However, during the operation of UULS, the use of advanced technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) introduces cybersecurity risks to the system. Moreover, severe natural disasters can also cause damage to underground transportation network links. Existing research and planning primarily concentrate on the system design and benefits of UULS, neglecting the system's service level under attack scenarios. This study outlines three representative UULS network prototypes and proposes a resilience quantification method centered on logistics efficiency. It also focuses on comparing the effectiveness of three recovery strategies. These strategies give priority to maximum flow, betweenness centrality, and regional importance, as well as the priority of node and link repairs. The resilience quantification method and recovery strategies are applied in a case study set in Nanjing City. The case study results reveal that the Two-echelon network shows exceptional resilience. Regarding the effectiveness of recovery strategies, the strategy based on maximum flow proves to be the most effective, and focusing on node repair can lead to higher system resilience. Based on these findings, this study offers recommendations to transportation and logistics management decision-makers, focusing on UULS resilience and recovery strategy selection. These recommendations are intended to provide valuable guidance for the planning and design of future UULS, ensuring their resilience and reliability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市地下物流系统(UULS)已成为缓解城市地面交通拥堵、环境污染和地面交通安全风险的新兴解决方案。然而,在 UULS 运行过程中,物联网(IoT)等先进技术的使用会给系统带来网络安全风险。此外,严重的自然灾害也会对地下交通网络链接造成破坏。现有的研究和规划主要集中在 UULS 的系统设计和优势上,忽视了系统在攻击情况下的服务水平。本研究概述了三个具有代表性的 UULS 网络原型,并提出了一种以物流效率为中心的弹性量化方法。研究还重点比较了三种恢复策略的有效性。这些策略优先考虑最大流量、介度中心性和区域重要性,以及节点和链路修复的优先级。复原力量化方法和复原策略在南京市的案例研究中得到了应用。案例研究结果表明,"双核网络 "表现出了卓越的恢复能力。在恢复策略的有效性方面,基于最大流量的策略被证明是最有效的,而专注于节点修复则能带来更高的系统恢复能力。基于这些发现,本研究针对 UULS 的恢复能力和恢复策略选择,向运输和物流管理决策者提出了建议。这些建议旨在为未来 UULS 的规划和设计提供有价值的指导,确保其恢复能力和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience quantification and recovery strategy simulation for urban underground logistics systems under node and link attacks: A case study of Nanjing city

Urban Underground Logistics Systems (UULS) have become an emerging solution to mitigate urban surface traffic congestion, environmental pollution, and surface transport safety risks. However, during the operation of UULS, the use of advanced technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) introduces cybersecurity risks to the system. Moreover, severe natural disasters can also cause damage to underground transportation network links. Existing research and planning primarily concentrate on the system design and benefits of UULS, neglecting the system's service level under attack scenarios. This study outlines three representative UULS network prototypes and proposes a resilience quantification method centered on logistics efficiency. It also focuses on comparing the effectiveness of three recovery strategies. These strategies give priority to maximum flow, betweenness centrality, and regional importance, as well as the priority of node and link repairs. The resilience quantification method and recovery strategies are applied in a case study set in Nanjing City. The case study results reveal that the Two-echelon network shows exceptional resilience. Regarding the effectiveness of recovery strategies, the strategy based on maximum flow proves to be the most effective, and focusing on node repair can lead to higher system resilience. Based on these findings, this study offers recommendations to transportation and logistics management decision-makers, focusing on UULS resilience and recovery strategy selection. These recommendations are intended to provide valuable guidance for the planning and design of future UULS, ensuring their resilience and reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: 1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors. 2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection. 3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures. 4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信