{"title":"骆驼奶和牛奶发酵过程中螺旋乳杆菌、德尔布鲁贝克乳杆菌保加利亚亚种和嗜热链球菌的生长、酸化和蛋白水解活性的差异","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.idairyj.2024.106075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates low-fat camel milk and cow milk fermentation behavior by <em>Lactobacillus helveticus</em>, <em>Lactobacillus delbrueckii</em> subsp. <em>bulgaricus</em>, and <em>Streptococcus thermophilus</em> at 28, 35, and 42 °C. Bacterial counts, titratable acidity (TA%), pH, lactose, lactic acid, and proteolysis were followed for 96 h. Temperature and bacteria highly affected all these parameters (p < 0.001) while milk type affected bacterial counts and degree of proteolysis and lactose (p < 0.001), pH, and lactic acid (p < 0.01) but did not affect TA (%). Fermented camel and cow milk products showed similar negative correlations between TA (%) and pH suggesting comparable buffering capacities. In both fermented products, the behavior of <em>L. helveticus</em> was more comparable to that of <em>S. thermophilus</em> than <em>L. bulgaricus</em>. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed a negative correlation between bacterial growth and the degree of proteolysis. The results of this study provided insights into the complex dynamics of bacterial interactions with different milk substrates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13854,"journal":{"name":"International Dairy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the growth, acidification, and proteolytic activities of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus in camel and cow milk fermentation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idairyj.2024.106075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates low-fat camel milk and cow milk fermentation behavior by <em>Lactobacillus helveticus</em>, <em>Lactobacillus delbrueckii</em> subsp. <em>bulgaricus</em>, and <em>Streptococcus thermophilus</em> at 28, 35, and 42 °C. Bacterial counts, titratable acidity (TA%), pH, lactose, lactic acid, and proteolysis were followed for 96 h. Temperature and bacteria highly affected all these parameters (p < 0.001) while milk type affected bacterial counts and degree of proteolysis and lactose (p < 0.001), pH, and lactic acid (p < 0.01) but did not affect TA (%). Fermented camel and cow milk products showed similar negative correlations between TA (%) and pH suggesting comparable buffering capacities. In both fermented products, the behavior of <em>L. helveticus</em> was more comparable to that of <em>S. thermophilus</em> than <em>L. bulgaricus</em>. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed a negative correlation between bacterial growth and the degree of proteolysis. The results of this study provided insights into the complex dynamics of bacterial interactions with different milk substrates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Dairy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Dairy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095869462400195X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Dairy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095869462400195X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究调查了低脂骆驼奶和牛奶在 28、35 和 42 °C 下由螺旋乳杆菌、德尔布鲁贝克乳杆菌保加利亚亚种和嗜热链球菌发酵的行为。细菌数量、可滴定酸度(TA%)、pH 值、乳糖、乳酸和蛋白水解度均受到 96 小时的跟踪监测。温度和细菌对所有这些参数都有很大影响(p <0.001),而牛奶类型会影响细菌数量、蛋白水解度、乳糖(p <0.001)、pH 值和乳酸(p <0.01),但不会影响可滴定酸度(TA%)。发酵的骆驼奶和牛奶产品的 TA (%) 和 pH 值之间呈现出类似的负相关,这表明它们具有相似的缓冲能力。在这两种发酵产品中,嗜热嗜酸乳杆菌的行为比保加利亚乳杆菌更相似。主成分分析(PCA)显示,细菌生长与蛋白水解程度之间呈负相关。这项研究的结果为了解细菌与不同牛奶基质相互作用的复杂动态提供了启示。
Differences in the growth, acidification, and proteolytic activities of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus in camel and cow milk fermentation
This study investigates low-fat camel milk and cow milk fermentation behavior by Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus at 28, 35, and 42 °C. Bacterial counts, titratable acidity (TA%), pH, lactose, lactic acid, and proteolysis were followed for 96 h. Temperature and bacteria highly affected all these parameters (p < 0.001) while milk type affected bacterial counts and degree of proteolysis and lactose (p < 0.001), pH, and lactic acid (p < 0.01) but did not affect TA (%). Fermented camel and cow milk products showed similar negative correlations between TA (%) and pH suggesting comparable buffering capacities. In both fermented products, the behavior of L. helveticus was more comparable to that of S. thermophilus than L. bulgaricus. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed a negative correlation between bacterial growth and the degree of proteolysis. The results of this study provided insights into the complex dynamics of bacterial interactions with different milk substrates.
期刊介绍:
The International Dairy Journal publishes significant advancements in dairy science and technology in the form of research articles and critical reviews that are of relevance to the broader international dairy community. Within this scope, research on the science and technology of milk and dairy products and the nutritional and health aspects of dairy foods are included; the journal pays particular attention to applied research and its interface with the dairy industry.
The journal''s coverage includes the following, where directly applicable to dairy science and technology:
• Chemistry and physico-chemical properties of milk constituents
• Microbiology, food safety, enzymology, biotechnology
• Processing and engineering
• Emulsion science, food structure, and texture
• Raw material quality and effect on relevant products
• Flavour and off-flavour development
• Technological functionality and applications of dairy ingredients
• Sensory and consumer sciences
• Nutrition and substantiation of human health implications of milk components or dairy products
International Dairy Journal does not publish papers related to milk production, animal health and other aspects of on-farm milk production unless there is a clear relationship to dairy technology, human health or final product quality.