2020-2022 年澳大利亚经常注射毒品者中的纳洛酮护理级联

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jane Akhurst , Olivia Price , Rachel Sutherland , Daisy Gibbs , Paul Dietze , Raimondo Bruno , Seraina Agramunt , Samantha Colledge-Frisby , Simon Lenton , Caroline Salom , Natalie Thomas , Amy Peacock
{"title":"2020-2022 年澳大利亚经常注射毒品者中的纳洛酮护理级联","authors":"Jane Akhurst ,&nbsp;Olivia Price ,&nbsp;Rachel Sutherland ,&nbsp;Daisy Gibbs ,&nbsp;Paul Dietze ,&nbsp;Raimondo Bruno ,&nbsp;Seraina Agramunt ,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby ,&nbsp;Simon Lenton ,&nbsp;Caroline Salom ,&nbsp;Natalie Thomas ,&nbsp;Amy Peacock","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Examining take-home naloxone (THN) uptake using a ‘cascade of care’ framework could help identify targets for increasing THN training and carriage among people who may witness or experience opioid overdose. We describe the THN cascade and factors associated with engagement among people who inject drugs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>People aged ≥18 years in Australia who inject drugs were interviewed from 2020 to 2022, reporting lifetime THN awareness and acquisition and past-month carriage. We examined factors associated with engagement using multivariable logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 2,149 participants (64 % men, mean age 44.5), 85 % had heard of naloxone, of whom 76 % were aware of THN programs. Of these, 72 % had ever participated in THN training/brief education, 92 % of whom had acquired THN. Of those who had ever acquired THN and reported past-month opioid use, 63 % always/often carried THN when using opioids. Past six-month opioid agonist treatment (OAT) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.55; 95 %CI 1.91–3.42) and ≥daily injecting (1.32; 1.01–1.73) were associated with awareness. OAT (1.79; 1.38–2.33), past-year opioid overdose (1.68; 1.18–2.42) and older age (1.02; 1.00–1.03) were associated with acquisition. Primarily injecting methamphetamine (versus heroin) in the past month was associated with lower awareness (0.43; 0.31–0.58) and acquisition (0.59; 0.44–0.78). Reporting no accommodation (squatting/sleeping rough) was associated with reduced odds of carriage (0.46; 0.24–0.88).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants reported high THN awareness and acquisition, with lower carriage. Future efforts should focus on improving THN access and reducing barriers to carriage, particularly for people experiencing homelessness or who primarily inject non-opioids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002561/pdfft?md5=e01fd36fef41be068c8a49e114c42338&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002561-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naloxone cascade of care among people who regularly inject drugs in Australia, 2020–2022\",\"authors\":\"Jane Akhurst ,&nbsp;Olivia Price ,&nbsp;Rachel Sutherland ,&nbsp;Daisy Gibbs ,&nbsp;Paul Dietze ,&nbsp;Raimondo Bruno ,&nbsp;Seraina Agramunt ,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby ,&nbsp;Simon Lenton ,&nbsp;Caroline Salom ,&nbsp;Natalie Thomas ,&nbsp;Amy Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Examining take-home naloxone (THN) uptake using a ‘cascade of care’ framework could help identify targets for increasing THN training and carriage among people who may witness or experience opioid overdose. We describe the THN cascade and factors associated with engagement among people who inject drugs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>People aged ≥18 years in Australia who inject drugs were interviewed from 2020 to 2022, reporting lifetime THN awareness and acquisition and past-month carriage. We examined factors associated with engagement using multivariable logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 2,149 participants (64 % men, mean age 44.5), 85 % had heard of naloxone, of whom 76 % were aware of THN programs. Of these, 72 % had ever participated in THN training/brief education, 92 % of whom had acquired THN. Of those who had ever acquired THN and reported past-month opioid use, 63 % always/often carried THN when using opioids. Past six-month opioid agonist treatment (OAT) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.55; 95 %CI 1.91–3.42) and ≥daily injecting (1.32; 1.01–1.73) were associated with awareness. OAT (1.79; 1.38–2.33), past-year opioid overdose (1.68; 1.18–2.42) and older age (1.02; 1.00–1.03) were associated with acquisition. Primarily injecting methamphetamine (versus heroin) in the past month was associated with lower awareness (0.43; 0.31–0.58) and acquisition (0.59; 0.44–0.78). Reporting no accommodation (squatting/sleeping rough) was associated with reduced odds of carriage (0.46; 0.24–0.88).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants reported high THN awareness and acquisition, with lower carriage. Future efforts should focus on improving THN access and reducing barriers to carriage, particularly for people experiencing homelessness or who primarily inject non-opioids.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002561/pdfft?md5=e01fd36fef41be068c8a49e114c42338&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002561-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景使用 "护理级联 "框架研究带回家纳洛酮(THN)的使用情况,有助于确定在可能目睹或经历阿片类药物过量的人群中增加 THN 培训和携带的目标。我们描述了 THN 级联以及与注射吸毒者参与度相关的因素。方法在 2020 年至 2022 年期间,我们对澳大利亚年龄≥18 岁的注射吸毒者进行了访谈,他们报告了生前对 THN 的认识和获取情况以及过去一个月的携带情况。结果在 2,149 名参与者中(64% 为男性,平均年龄为 44.5 岁),85% 的人听说过纳洛酮,其中 76% 的人了解 THN 计划。其中 72% 的人参加过 THN 培训/简短教育,92% 的人获得过 THN。在曾经获得过 THN 并报告上个月使用过阿片类药物的人中,63% 的人在使用阿片类药物时总是/经常携带 THN。过去六个月的阿片激动剂治疗(OAT)(调整赔率[AOR]2.55;95 %CI 1.91-3.42)和≥每日注射(1.32;1.01-1.73)与意识有关。OAT(1.79;1.38-2.33)、过去一年阿片类药物过量(1.68;1.18-2.42)和年龄较大(1.02;1.00-1.03)与获取有关。过去一个月主要注射甲基苯丙胺(相对于海洛因)与较低的知晓率(0.43;0.31-0.58)和获得率(0.59;0.44-0.78)有关。结论参与者对 THN 的知晓率和获得率较高,而携带率较低。未来的工作重点应放在改善 THN 获取途径和减少携带障碍上,特别是对于无家可归者或主要注射非阿片类药物的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Naloxone cascade of care among people who regularly inject drugs in Australia, 2020–2022

Background

Examining take-home naloxone (THN) uptake using a ‘cascade of care’ framework could help identify targets for increasing THN training and carriage among people who may witness or experience opioid overdose. We describe the THN cascade and factors associated with engagement among people who inject drugs.

Methods

People aged ≥18 years in Australia who inject drugs were interviewed from 2020 to 2022, reporting lifetime THN awareness and acquisition and past-month carriage. We examined factors associated with engagement using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of 2,149 participants (64 % men, mean age 44.5), 85 % had heard of naloxone, of whom 76 % were aware of THN programs. Of these, 72 % had ever participated in THN training/brief education, 92 % of whom had acquired THN. Of those who had ever acquired THN and reported past-month opioid use, 63 % always/often carried THN when using opioids. Past six-month opioid agonist treatment (OAT) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.55; 95 %CI 1.91–3.42) and ≥daily injecting (1.32; 1.01–1.73) were associated with awareness. OAT (1.79; 1.38–2.33), past-year opioid overdose (1.68; 1.18–2.42) and older age (1.02; 1.00–1.03) were associated with acquisition. Primarily injecting methamphetamine (versus heroin) in the past month was associated with lower awareness (0.43; 0.31–0.58) and acquisition (0.59; 0.44–0.78). Reporting no accommodation (squatting/sleeping rough) was associated with reduced odds of carriage (0.46; 0.24–0.88).

Conclusion

Participants reported high THN awareness and acquisition, with lower carriage. Future efforts should focus on improving THN access and reducing barriers to carriage, particularly for people experiencing homelessness or who primarily inject non-opioids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信