编辑评论:膝关节镜术后皮质类固醇注射似乎越接近手术时间越会增加感染风险,但感染发生率较低以及感染严重程度方面的未解之谜仍给如何为患者提供最佳指导带来挑战。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jacob F Oeding
{"title":"编辑评论:膝关节镜术后皮质类固醇注射似乎越接近手术时间越会增加感染风险,但感染发生率较低以及感染严重程度方面的未解之谜仍给如何为患者提供最佳指导带来挑战。","authors":"Jacob F Oeding","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the known immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, the relationship between corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and postoperative infection risk has been frequently studied in the literature to date. The period within 4 weeks after knee arthroscopy has been identified as a particularly high-risk time to receive a CSI, and caution has been recommended as a result of the increased risk for infection that patients who receive a CSI during this time experience. CSIs given within 4 weeks prior to knee arthroscopy and at the time of knee arthroscopy have been shown to increase postoperative infection risk as well. As surgeons seek to better understand this association to be able to counsel patients about an appropriate interval between surgery and injection-as CSIs have been proven to accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce prolonged inflammation-questions remain, nonetheless. For example, while superficial infections may be localized and treated with a short course of oral antibiotics, deep infections can involve hospitalizations, intravenous antibiotics, and reoperation in the form of procedures like irrigation and debridement. Thus, the severity of infections associated with CSIs administered around the time of knee arthroscopy remains unclear. One explanation for these unanswered questions is the relatively low frequency with which these complications occur and the fact that many studies that seek to address them rely on large commercial claims databases to do so. These databases frequently lack granularity but, due to the large sample size they offer, frequently provide the best available option to address such questions. Nevertheless, their limitations should be understood to avoid overstating clinical significance in the context of statistical significance and ensure conclusions are interpreted in their proper context.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Commentary: Postoperative Corticosteroid Injections After Knee Arthroscopy Increase the Risk for Infection the Closer They Are Administered to Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob F Oeding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the known immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, the relationship between corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and postoperative infection risk has been frequently studied in the literature to date. The period within 4 weeks after knee arthroscopy has been identified as a particularly high-risk time to receive a CSI, and caution has been recommended as a result of the increased risk for infection that patients who receive a CSI during this time experience. CSIs given within 4 weeks prior to knee arthroscopy and at the time of knee arthroscopy have been shown to increase postoperative infection risk as well. As surgeons seek to better understand this association to be able to counsel patients about an appropriate interval between surgery and injection-as CSIs have been proven to accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce prolonged inflammation-questions remain, nonetheless. For example, while superficial infections may be localized and treated with a short course of oral antibiotics, deep infections can involve hospitalizations, intravenous antibiotics, and reoperation in the form of procedures like irrigation and debridement. Thus, the severity of infections associated with CSIs administered around the time of knee arthroscopy remains unclear. One explanation for these unanswered questions is the relatively low frequency with which these complications occur and the fact that many studies that seek to address them rely on large commercial claims databases to do so. These databases frequently lack granularity but, due to the large sample size they offer, frequently provide the best available option to address such questions. Nevertheless, their limitations should be understood to avoid overstating clinical significance in the context of statistical significance and ensure conclusions are interpreted in their proper context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.033\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于糖皮质激素具有已知的免疫抑制作用,迄今为止,有关皮质类固醇注射(CSI)与术后感染风险之间关系的研究在文献中屡见不鲜。膝关节镜手术后四周内被认为是接受 CSI 的高风险时期,由于在此期间接受 CSI 的患者感染风险会增加,因此建议患者谨慎使用。膝关节镜检查前四周内和膝关节镜检查时接受 CSI 也会增加术后感染风险。外科医生试图更好地了解这种关联,以便就手术和注射之间的适当间隔为患者提供咨询--因为 CSI 已被证明可加速术后恢复并减少炎症的持续时间--但问题依然存在。例如,表皮感染可能是局部的,只需口服短期抗生素即可治疗,而深部感染则可能需要住院、静脉注射抗生素,并以冲洗和清创(I&D)等手术形式再次手术。因此,膝关节镜检查时使用 CSIs 所引起感染的严重程度仍不清楚。造成这些未解之谜的原因之一是这些并发症发生的频率相对较低,而且许多试图解决这些问题的研究都依赖于大型商业索赔数据库。这些数据库往往不够精细,但由于样本量大,往往是解决此类问题的最佳选择。尽管如此,仍应了解这些数据库的局限性,以避免在统计意义的背景下夸大临床意义,并确保在适当的背景下解释结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial Commentary: Postoperative Corticosteroid Injections After Knee Arthroscopy Increase the Risk for Infection the Closer They Are Administered to Surgery.

Given the known immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, the relationship between corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and postoperative infection risk has been frequently studied in the literature to date. The period within 4 weeks after knee arthroscopy has been identified as a particularly high-risk time to receive a CSI, and caution has been recommended as a result of the increased risk for infection that patients who receive a CSI during this time experience. CSIs given within 4 weeks prior to knee arthroscopy and at the time of knee arthroscopy have been shown to increase postoperative infection risk as well. As surgeons seek to better understand this association to be able to counsel patients about an appropriate interval between surgery and injection-as CSIs have been proven to accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce prolonged inflammation-questions remain, nonetheless. For example, while superficial infections may be localized and treated with a short course of oral antibiotics, deep infections can involve hospitalizations, intravenous antibiotics, and reoperation in the form of procedures like irrigation and debridement. Thus, the severity of infections associated with CSIs administered around the time of knee arthroscopy remains unclear. One explanation for these unanswered questions is the relatively low frequency with which these complications occur and the fact that many studies that seek to address them rely on large commercial claims databases to do so. These databases frequently lack granularity but, due to the large sample size they offer, frequently provide the best available option to address such questions. Nevertheless, their limitations should be understood to avoid overstating clinical significance in the context of statistical significance and ensure conclusions are interpreted in their proper context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信