静脉注射和口服酮咯酸的阿片类稀释止痛方案可减少关节镜半月板手术后阿片类药物的用量和疼痛程度:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
John T Strony, Sunita Mengers, Lakshmanan Sivasundaram, Margaret Sinkler, Qian Wu, Chenya Zhao, Abdus Sattar, Michael J Salata, James E Voos, Michael R Karns
{"title":"静脉注射和口服酮咯酸的阿片类稀释止痛方案可减少关节镜半月板手术后阿片类药物的用量和疼痛程度:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"John T Strony, Sunita Mengers, Lakshmanan Sivasundaram, Margaret Sinkler, Qian Wu, Chenya Zhao, Abdus Sattar, Michael J Salata, James E Voos, Michael R Karns","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary purpose was to compare ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen with respect to pain and opioid consumption after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare short-term functional outcomes between the two protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A power analysis demonstrated that 43 patients were required. In this randomized control trial, patients with meniscal pathology undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were included. Group 1 received oxycodone-acetaminophen alone. Group 2 received one dose of intravenous ketorolac intraoperatively, oral ketorolac upon discharge, and \"rescue\" oxycodone-acetaminophen. Patients recorded the number of opioid tablets consumed and visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores three times per day for five days postoperatively. Opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). VAS, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients were randomized. There were 25 patients in the control group and 23 patients in the ketorolac group. The mean age was 47.9 (±14.3) years. Fifty-two percent (n=25) of the population were female. Three patients (6.3%) underwent meniscal repair. During the first five days postoperatively, the mean VAS score (β= -13.2, SE=5.97, p=0.029) and the MME consumed were significantly lower (β=-4.7, SE=1.93, p=0.015) per time point in the ketorolac group relative to the control group. The control group had better LKSS (80.6 [SD 18.5] versus 65 [SD 21.5], p=0.016) and KOOS (74.1 [SD 16.7] versus 61.9 [SD 18.6], p=0.029) scores at 6 weeks. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An opioid-sparing pain protocol of intravenous and oral ketorolac is associated with significant reductions in VAS scores and MME consumption in the first five days after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. There were significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up, favoring the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions and side effects.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II, prospective randomized-controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Opioid-Sparing Pain Protocol of Intravenous and Oral Ketorolac Reduces Opioid Consumption and Pain Levels after Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"John T Strony, Sunita Mengers, Lakshmanan Sivasundaram, Margaret Sinkler, Qian Wu, Chenya Zhao, Abdus Sattar, Michael J Salata, James E Voos, Michael R Karns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary purpose was to compare ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen with respect to pain and opioid consumption after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare short-term functional outcomes between the two protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A power analysis demonstrated that 43 patients were required. In this randomized control trial, patients with meniscal pathology undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were included. Group 1 received oxycodone-acetaminophen alone. Group 2 received one dose of intravenous ketorolac intraoperatively, oral ketorolac upon discharge, and \\\"rescue\\\" oxycodone-acetaminophen. Patients recorded the number of opioid tablets consumed and visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores three times per day for five days postoperatively. Opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). VAS, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients were randomized. There were 25 patients in the control group and 23 patients in the ketorolac group. The mean age was 47.9 (±14.3) years. Fifty-two percent (n=25) of the population were female. Three patients (6.3%) underwent meniscal repair. During the first five days postoperatively, the mean VAS score (β= -13.2, SE=5.97, p=0.029) and the MME consumed were significantly lower (β=-4.7, SE=1.93, p=0.015) per time point in the ketorolac group relative to the control group. The control group had better LKSS (80.6 [SD 18.5] versus 65 [SD 21.5], p=0.016) and KOOS (74.1 [SD 16.7] versus 61.9 [SD 18.6], p=0.029) scores at 6 weeks. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An opioid-sparing pain protocol of intravenous and oral ketorolac is associated with significant reductions in VAS scores and MME consumption in the first five days after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. There were significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up, favoring the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions and side effects.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level II, prospective randomized-controlled trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景主要目的是比较酮咯酸和羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚在关节镜半月板手术后的疼痛和阿片类药物消耗量。次要目的是比较两种方案的短期功能效果:方法:功率分析表明需要 43 名患者。在这项随机对照试验中,纳入了接受关节镜半月板手术的半月板病变患者。第一组只接受羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚治疗。第二组患者术中静脉注射一剂酮咯酸,出院时口服酮咯酸,并接受羟考酮-乙酰氨基酚 "救治"。术后五天内,患者每天三次记录阿片类药物的用量和视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评分。阿片类药物被转换为吗啡毫克当量(MME)。结果:48 名患者接受了随机治疗。结果:48 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中对照组 25 人,酮咯酸组 23 人。平均年龄为 47.9 (±14.3) 岁。52%(n=25)的患者为女性。三名患者(6.3%)接受了半月板修复术。术后前五天,酮咯酸组的平均VAS评分(β= -13.2,SE=5.97,P=0.029)和MME消耗量(β=-4.7,SE=1.93,P=0.015)均显著低于对照组。对照组在 6 周时的 LKSS(80.6 [SD 18.5] 对 65 [SD 21.5],p=0.016)和 KOOS(74.1 [SD 16.7] 对 61.9 [SD 18.6],p=0.029)评分更好。副作用发生率无明显差异:结论:静脉注射和口服酮咯酸的阿片类镇痛方案可显著降低关节镜半月板手术后头五天的VAS评分和MME用量。在最终随访中,患者报告的结果存在明显差异,对照组更优。不良反应和副作用无明显差异:证据级别:二级治疗,前瞻性随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Opioid-Sparing Pain Protocol of Intravenous and Oral Ketorolac Reduces Opioid Consumption and Pain Levels after Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The primary purpose was to compare ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen with respect to pain and opioid consumption after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare short-term functional outcomes between the two protocols.

Methods: A power analysis demonstrated that 43 patients were required. In this randomized control trial, patients with meniscal pathology undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were included. Group 1 received oxycodone-acetaminophen alone. Group 2 received one dose of intravenous ketorolac intraoperatively, oral ketorolac upon discharge, and "rescue" oxycodone-acetaminophen. Patients recorded the number of opioid tablets consumed and visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores three times per day for five days postoperatively. Opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). VAS, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were obtained.

Results: Forty-eight patients were randomized. There were 25 patients in the control group and 23 patients in the ketorolac group. The mean age was 47.9 (±14.3) years. Fifty-two percent (n=25) of the population were female. Three patients (6.3%) underwent meniscal repair. During the first five days postoperatively, the mean VAS score (β= -13.2, SE=5.97, p=0.029) and the MME consumed were significantly lower (β=-4.7, SE=1.93, p=0.015) per time point in the ketorolac group relative to the control group. The control group had better LKSS (80.6 [SD 18.5] versus 65 [SD 21.5], p=0.016) and KOOS (74.1 [SD 16.7] versus 61.9 [SD 18.6], p=0.029) scores at 6 weeks. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effects.

Conclusions: An opioid-sparing pain protocol of intravenous and oral ketorolac is associated with significant reductions in VAS scores and MME consumption in the first five days after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. There were significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up, favoring the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions and side effects.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II, prospective randomized-controlled trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信