专家医疗服务提供者在阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中实施综合协调护理。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Lesley M. Harris , Erick G. Guerrero , Tenie Khachikian , Veronica Serrett , Jeanne C. Marsh
{"title":"专家医疗服务提供者在阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中实施综合协调护理。","authors":"Lesley M. Harris ,&nbsp;Erick G. Guerrero ,&nbsp;Tenie Khachikian ,&nbsp;Veronica Serrett ,&nbsp;Jeanne C. Marsh","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Enhancing care integration and coordination to improve patient outcomes in opioid use disorder treatment is a growing focus in the field. Understanding of how the treatment system implements coordination and integration, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, remains limited. In this study, we explored the implementation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and the evolution of service delivery toward a more comprehensive approach. We examined providers’ perspectives from high-achieving programs in Los Angeles County, the largest and most diverse U.S. county, including barriers to integrating and coordinating care and strategies for integrating MOUD service delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We gathered qualitative interview data from 30 high-performing programs in Los Angeles County, each represented by a manager or supervisor. High performance was defined by empirical indicators of access, retention, and program completion. Our data collection and analysis followed the constructivist grounded theory approach, explicating the social processes used by participating managers during the pandemic and subsequent organizational shifts. This approach yielded 14 major and six minor codes. Interrater reliability tests yielded a pooled Cohen's kappa statistic of 93%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Expert providers exhibited a strong commitment to destigmatizing MOUD and worked to overcome obstacles in delivering care to clients by advocating its efficacy to fellow health care providers. Along with their endorsement of MOUD, they identified challenges in integrating and coordinating MOUD care. Barriers included stigma at both patient and provider levels, inadequate education about MOUD, limited access to MOUD, and the complexities of operating in a fragmented health care framework. Despite these challenges, high-performing providers used strategies to harmonize and align MOUD service delivery with health and social services. These included establishing service colocation, adopting a multidisciplinary team-based approach, forming partnerships with the community, offering telehealth services, integrating and sharing data, and embracing a harm reduction philosophy.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Through the adoption of these strategies, providers enhanced care accessibility, boosted patient engagement, sustained retention in treatment, and enhanced treatment outcomes. Even among highly skilled treatment providers in Los Angeles County, barriers to integrating and coordinating care using MOUD remain intricate and multifaceted. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive strategy involving provider education and training, increased availability of MOUD, enhanced coordination and communication among health care providers, resolution of regulatory hurdles, and addressing patient hesitancy toward MOUD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002512/pdfft?md5=1bde095731b5d838e75950a2df57b4aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002512-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert providers implement integrated and coordinated care in opioid use disorder treatment\",\"authors\":\"Lesley M. Harris ,&nbsp;Erick G. Guerrero ,&nbsp;Tenie Khachikian ,&nbsp;Veronica Serrett ,&nbsp;Jeanne C. Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Enhancing care integration and coordination to improve patient outcomes in opioid use disorder treatment is a growing focus in the field. Understanding of how the treatment system implements coordination and integration, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, remains limited. In this study, we explored the implementation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and the evolution of service delivery toward a more comprehensive approach. We examined providers’ perspectives from high-achieving programs in Los Angeles County, the largest and most diverse U.S. county, including barriers to integrating and coordinating care and strategies for integrating MOUD service delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We gathered qualitative interview data from 30 high-performing programs in Los Angeles County, each represented by a manager or supervisor. High performance was defined by empirical indicators of access, retention, and program completion. Our data collection and analysis followed the constructivist grounded theory approach, explicating the social processes used by participating managers during the pandemic and subsequent organizational shifts. This approach yielded 14 major and six minor codes. Interrater reliability tests yielded a pooled Cohen's kappa statistic of 93%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Expert providers exhibited a strong commitment to destigmatizing MOUD and worked to overcome obstacles in delivering care to clients by advocating its efficacy to fellow health care providers. Along with their endorsement of MOUD, they identified challenges in integrating and coordinating MOUD care. Barriers included stigma at both patient and provider levels, inadequate education about MOUD, limited access to MOUD, and the complexities of operating in a fragmented health care framework. Despite these challenges, high-performing providers used strategies to harmonize and align MOUD service delivery with health and social services. These included establishing service colocation, adopting a multidisciplinary team-based approach, forming partnerships with the community, offering telehealth services, integrating and sharing data, and embracing a harm reduction philosophy.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Through the adoption of these strategies, providers enhanced care accessibility, boosted patient engagement, sustained retention in treatment, and enhanced treatment outcomes. Even among highly skilled treatment providers in Los Angeles County, barriers to integrating and coordinating care using MOUD remain intricate and multifaceted. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive strategy involving provider education and training, increased availability of MOUD, enhanced coordination and communication among health care providers, resolution of regulatory hurdles, and addressing patient hesitancy toward MOUD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002512/pdfft?md5=1bde095731b5d838e75950a2df57b4aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002512-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002512\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中,加强护理整合与协调以改善患者疗效是该领域日益关注的焦点。人们对治疗系统如何实施协调和整合的了解仍然有限,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行之后。在本研究中,我们探讨了阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗的实施情况,以及服务提供向更全面方法的演变。我们考察了美国最大、最多样化的县--洛杉矶县的优秀项目提供者的观点,包括整合和协调护理的障碍以及整合 MOUD 服务提供的策略:我们从洛杉矶县的 30 个高绩效项目中收集了定性访谈数据,每个项目都有一名经理或主管作为代表。高绩效的定义是指项目的可及性、保留率和项目完成率等经验指标。我们的数据收集和分析采用了建构主义基础理论方法,阐述了参与项目的管理人员在大流行病和随后的组织变革中使用的社会过程。这种方法产生了 14 个主要代码和 6 个次要代码。研究结果显示,科恩卡帕(Cohen's kappa)统计量为 93%:专家医疗服务提供者表现出了消除对 MOUD 的污名化的坚定决心,并通过向其他医疗服务提供者宣传 MOUD 的疗效,努力克服为客户提供医疗服务的障碍。在认可 MOUD 的同时,他们也指出了在整合和协调 MOUD 护理方面所面临的挑战。这些障碍包括患者和医疗服务提供者层面的耻辱感、有关 MOUD 的教育不足、获得 MOUD 的途径有限,以及在分散的医疗保健框架下运作的复杂性。尽管存在这些挑战,但表现出色的医疗服务提供者采用了各种策略,使提供的医疗服务与医疗和社会服务协调一致。这些策略包括:设立服务点、采用以多学科团队为基础的方法、与社区建立合作伙伴关系、提供远程医疗服务、整合和共享数据,以及接受减少伤害的理念:通过采取这些策略,医疗服务提供者提高了治疗的可及性,促进了患者的参与,保持了治疗的持续性,并增强了治疗效果。即使是在洛杉矶县技术娴熟的治疗提供者中,使用 MOUD 整合和协调护理的障碍仍然错综复杂、涉及多个方面。要应对这些挑战,就必须采取全面的策略,包括对医疗服务提供者进行教育和培训、提高 MOUD 的可用性、加强医疗服务提供者之间的协调和沟通、解决监管障碍以及解决患者对 MOUD 的犹豫不决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert providers implement integrated and coordinated care in opioid use disorder treatment

Background

Enhancing care integration and coordination to improve patient outcomes in opioid use disorder treatment is a growing focus in the field. Understanding of how the treatment system implements coordination and integration, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, remains limited. In this study, we explored the implementation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and the evolution of service delivery toward a more comprehensive approach. We examined providers’ perspectives from high-achieving programs in Los Angeles County, the largest and most diverse U.S. county, including barriers to integrating and coordinating care and strategies for integrating MOUD service delivery.

Methods

We gathered qualitative interview data from 30 high-performing programs in Los Angeles County, each represented by a manager or supervisor. High performance was defined by empirical indicators of access, retention, and program completion. Our data collection and analysis followed the constructivist grounded theory approach, explicating the social processes used by participating managers during the pandemic and subsequent organizational shifts. This approach yielded 14 major and six minor codes. Interrater reliability tests yielded a pooled Cohen's kappa statistic of 93%.

Results

Expert providers exhibited a strong commitment to destigmatizing MOUD and worked to overcome obstacles in delivering care to clients by advocating its efficacy to fellow health care providers. Along with their endorsement of MOUD, they identified challenges in integrating and coordinating MOUD care. Barriers included stigma at both patient and provider levels, inadequate education about MOUD, limited access to MOUD, and the complexities of operating in a fragmented health care framework. Despite these challenges, high-performing providers used strategies to harmonize and align MOUD service delivery with health and social services. These included establishing service colocation, adopting a multidisciplinary team-based approach, forming partnerships with the community, offering telehealth services, integrating and sharing data, and embracing a harm reduction philosophy.

Discussion

Through the adoption of these strategies, providers enhanced care accessibility, boosted patient engagement, sustained retention in treatment, and enhanced treatment outcomes. Even among highly skilled treatment providers in Los Angeles County, barriers to integrating and coordinating care using MOUD remain intricate and multifaceted. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive strategy involving provider education and training, increased availability of MOUD, enhanced coordination and communication among health care providers, resolution of regulatory hurdles, and addressing patient hesitancy toward MOUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信