用于估算 ARDS 机械力的压力控制替代公式与死亡率有关。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Richard H Kallet, Michael S Lipnick
{"title":"用于估算 ARDS 机械力的压力控制替代公式与死亡率有关。","authors":"Richard H Kallet, Michael S Lipnick","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> Mechanical power applied to the respiratory system (MP<sub>RS</sub>) is associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ARDS mortality. Absent automated ventilator MP<sub>RS</sub> measurements, the alternative is clinically unwieldy equations. However, simplified surrogate formulas are now available and accurately reflect values produced by airway pressure-volume curves. This retrospective, observational study examined whether the surrogate pressure-control equation alone could accurately assess mortality risk in ARDS subjects managed almost exclusively with volume-control ventilation.<b>METHODS:</b> 948 subjects were studied in whom invasive mechanical ventilation and implementation of ARDSNet ventilator protocols commenced ≤ 24hr after ARDS onset, and who survived > 24hr. MP<sub>RS</sub> was calculated as 0.098 x respiratory frequency x VT x (PEEP + driving pressure [P<sub>DR</sub>]). MP<sub>RS</sub> was assessed as a risk factor for hospital mortality, and compared between non-survivors and survivors across Berlin Definition classifications. In addition, mortality was compared across 4 MP<sub>RS</sub> thresholds associated with VILI or mortality (ie. 15, 20, 25 and 30 J/m).<b>RESULTS:</b> MP<sub>RS</sub> was associated with increased mortality risk: Odds Ratio (95% CI) of 1.06 (1.04-1.07) per J/m, P<0.001). Median MP<sub>RS</sub> differentiated non-survivors from survivors in Mild (24.7 vs. 18.5 J/m, respectively, P==0.034); Moderate (25.7 vs. 21.3 J/m, P<0.001); and Severe ARDS (28.7 vs. 23.5 J/m, P<0.001). Across 4 MP<sub>RS</sub> thresholds mortality increased from 23-29% when MP<sub>RS</sub> was < threshold vs. 38-51% when MP<sub>RS</sub> was > threshold (P<0.001). In the > cohort the Odds Ratio (95%CI) increased from 2.03 (1.34-3.12) to 2.51 (1.87-3.33).<b>CONCLUSION:</b> The pressure control surrogate formula is sufficiently accurate to assess mortality in ARDS, even when using volume control ventilation. In our subjects when MP<sub>RS</sub> exceeds established cut-off values for VILI or mortality risk, we found mortality risk consistently increased by a factor of > 2.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure Control Surrogate Formula for Estimating Mechanical Power in ARDS is Associated with Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Richard H Kallet, Michael S Lipnick\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.12269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> Mechanical power applied to the respiratory system (MP<sub>RS</sub>) is associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ARDS mortality. Absent automated ventilator MP<sub>RS</sub> measurements, the alternative is clinically unwieldy equations. However, simplified surrogate formulas are now available and accurately reflect values produced by airway pressure-volume curves. This retrospective, observational study examined whether the surrogate pressure-control equation alone could accurately assess mortality risk in ARDS subjects managed almost exclusively with volume-control ventilation.<b>METHODS:</b> 948 subjects were studied in whom invasive mechanical ventilation and implementation of ARDSNet ventilator protocols commenced ≤ 24hr after ARDS onset, and who survived > 24hr. MP<sub>RS</sub> was calculated as 0.098 x respiratory frequency x VT x (PEEP + driving pressure [P<sub>DR</sub>]). MP<sub>RS</sub> was assessed as a risk factor for hospital mortality, and compared between non-survivors and survivors across Berlin Definition classifications. In addition, mortality was compared across 4 MP<sub>RS</sub> thresholds associated with VILI or mortality (ie. 15, 20, 25 and 30 J/m).<b>RESULTS:</b> MP<sub>RS</sub> was associated with increased mortality risk: Odds Ratio (95% CI) of 1.06 (1.04-1.07) per J/m, P<0.001). Median MP<sub>RS</sub> differentiated non-survivors from survivors in Mild (24.7 vs. 18.5 J/m, respectively, P==0.034); Moderate (25.7 vs. 21.3 J/m, P<0.001); and Severe ARDS (28.7 vs. 23.5 J/m, P<0.001). Across 4 MP<sub>RS</sub> thresholds mortality increased from 23-29% when MP<sub>RS</sub> was < threshold vs. 38-51% when MP<sub>RS</sub> was > threshold (P<0.001). In the > cohort the Odds Ratio (95%CI) increased from 2.03 (1.34-3.12) to 2.51 (1.87-3.33).<b>CONCLUSION:</b> The pressure control surrogate formula is sufficiently accurate to assess mortality in ARDS, even when using volume control ventilation. In our subjects when MP<sub>RS</sub> exceeds established cut-off values for VILI or mortality risk, we found mortality risk consistently increased by a factor of > 2.0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应用于呼吸系统的机械力(MPRS)与呼吸机诱发的肺损伤(VILI)和 ARDS 死亡率有关。如果不对呼吸机 MPRS 进行自动测量,则只能使用临床上难以使用的公式。不过,现在有了简化的代用公式,可以准确反映气道压力-容积曲线产生的数值。方法:研究对象为 ARDS 发病后 24 小时内开始使用有创机械通气和 ARDSNet 呼吸机协议且存活时间大于 24 小时的 948 名受试者。MPRS 的计算公式为 0.098 x 呼吸频率 x VT x (PEEP + 驱动压 [PDR])。将 MPRS 作为住院死亡率的风险因素进行评估,并在柏林定义分类中对未存活者和存活者进行比较。此外,还比较了与 VILI 或死亡率相关的 4 个 MPRS 临界值(即 15、20、25 和 30 J/m)的死亡率:结论:压力控制代用公式足以准确评估 ARDS 的死亡率,即使在使用容量控制通气时也是如此。在我们的受试者中,当 MPRS 超过 VILI 或死亡风险的既定临界值时,我们发现死亡风险会持续增加 > 2.0 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pressure Control Surrogate Formula for Estimating Mechanical Power in ARDS is Associated with Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical power applied to the respiratory system (MPRS) is associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ARDS mortality. Absent automated ventilator MPRS measurements, the alternative is clinically unwieldy equations. However, simplified surrogate formulas are now available and accurately reflect values produced by airway pressure-volume curves. This retrospective, observational study examined whether the surrogate pressure-control equation alone could accurately assess mortality risk in ARDS subjects managed almost exclusively with volume-control ventilation.METHODS: 948 subjects were studied in whom invasive mechanical ventilation and implementation of ARDSNet ventilator protocols commenced ≤ 24hr after ARDS onset, and who survived > 24hr. MPRS was calculated as 0.098 x respiratory frequency x VT x (PEEP + driving pressure [PDR]). MPRS was assessed as a risk factor for hospital mortality, and compared between non-survivors and survivors across Berlin Definition classifications. In addition, mortality was compared across 4 MPRS thresholds associated with VILI or mortality (ie. 15, 20, 25 and 30 J/m).RESULTS: MPRS was associated with increased mortality risk: Odds Ratio (95% CI) of 1.06 (1.04-1.07) per J/m, P<0.001). Median MPRS differentiated non-survivors from survivors in Mild (24.7 vs. 18.5 J/m, respectively, P==0.034); Moderate (25.7 vs. 21.3 J/m, P<0.001); and Severe ARDS (28.7 vs. 23.5 J/m, P<0.001). Across 4 MPRS thresholds mortality increased from 23-29% when MPRS was < threshold vs. 38-51% when MPRS was > threshold (P<0.001). In the > cohort the Odds Ratio (95%CI) increased from 2.03 (1.34-3.12) to 2.51 (1.87-3.33).CONCLUSION: The pressure control surrogate formula is sufficiently accurate to assess mortality in ARDS, even when using volume control ventilation. In our subjects when MPRS exceeds established cut-off values for VILI or mortality risk, we found mortality risk consistently increased by a factor of > 2.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信