使用大剂量阿片类药物的癌症患者采用 3 天转换策略进行美沙酮转换:回顾性研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lei Lei, Qinfei Zhou, Xi Liu, Guanai Bao, Haiying Ding, Qunfang Ding, Liyan Gong
{"title":"使用大剂量阿片类药物的癌症患者采用 3 天转换策略进行美沙酮转换:回顾性研究。","authors":"Lei Lei, Qinfei Zhou, Xi Liu, Guanai Bao, Haiying Ding, Qunfang Ding, Liyan Gong","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00651-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methadone has shown effectiveness in pain control in patients with cancer who are intolerant to other opioids in China. However, the optimal strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids in refractory cancer pain remains debatable. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of a 3-day switch (3DS) strategy for methadone conversion in patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 30-day medical records of 70 patients with refractory cancer pain who used a 3DS strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids from July 2018 to December 2022. The 3DS strategy indicated that the methadone dose was increased by one third every day for 3 days. Data on the rate of successful conversion, the time to stable analgesia after conversion, the conversion efficiency, the corrected QT (QTc) interval, the actual conversion ratios, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients received 3DS methadone conversion and 64 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty patients (78%) achieved stable analgesia, and the median time to stable analgesia was 8.14 ± 2.70 (range 6-14) days. The average dose of methadone was 77.94 ± 42.74 mg. The most common AEs (≥ 10%) included constipation, dry mouth, nausea, and cold sweats. The incidence of constipation was reduced post-methadone conversion, and a statistically significant but asymptomatic prolongation of the QTc interval was observed. Additionally, the actual conversion ratios were lower than Ayonrinde's recommended ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3DS strategy for methadone conversion is applicable in Chinese patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Lei, Qinfei Zhou, Xi Liu, Guanai Bao, Haiying Ding, Qunfang Ding, Liyan Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-024-00651-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methadone has shown effectiveness in pain control in patients with cancer who are intolerant to other opioids in China. However, the optimal strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids in refractory cancer pain remains debatable. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of a 3-day switch (3DS) strategy for methadone conversion in patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 30-day medical records of 70 patients with refractory cancer pain who used a 3DS strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids from July 2018 to December 2022. The 3DS strategy indicated that the methadone dose was increased by one third every day for 3 days. Data on the rate of successful conversion, the time to stable analgesia after conversion, the conversion efficiency, the corrected QT (QTc) interval, the actual conversion ratios, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients received 3DS methadone conversion and 64 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty patients (78%) achieved stable analgesia, and the median time to stable analgesia was 8.14 ± 2.70 (range 6-14) days. The average dose of methadone was 77.94 ± 42.74 mg. The most common AEs (≥ 10%) included constipation, dry mouth, nausea, and cold sweats. The incidence of constipation was reduced post-methadone conversion, and a statistically significant but asymptomatic prolongation of the QTc interval was observed. Additionally, the actual conversion ratios were lower than Ayonrinde's recommended ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3DS strategy for methadone conversion is applicable in Chinese patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00651-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00651-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在中国,对其他阿片类药物不耐受的癌症患者使用美沙酮可有效控制疼痛。然而,对于难治性癌痛患者而言,从以往大剂量阿片类药物转为美沙酮的最佳策略仍存在争议。本研究旨在描述大剂量阿片类药物难治性癌痛患者美沙酮3天转换(3DS)策略的有效性和安全性:我们回顾性审查了70名难治性癌痛患者的30天病历,这些患者在2018年7月至2022年12月期间使用3DS策略从之前的大剂量阿片类药物转换为美沙酮。3DS 策略表明,美沙酮剂量每天增加三分之一,持续 3 天。结果分析了成功转换率、转换后稳定镇痛时间、转换效率、校正QT(QTc)间期、实际转换比率、不良事件(AEs)和生活质量等数据:70名患者接受了3DS美沙酮转换,64名患者符合分析条件。50名患者(78%)获得了稳定镇痛,稳定镇痛的中位时间为8.14±2.70(范围6-14)天。美沙酮的平均剂量为 77.94 ± 42.74 毫克。最常见的不良反应(≥10%)包括便秘、口干、恶心和出冷汗。美沙酮转换后,便秘的发生率有所降低,同时观察到 QTc 间期延长,但无症状,具有统计学意义。此外,实际转换比率低于 Ayonrinde 推荐的比率:3DS美沙酮转换策略适用于使用大剂量阿片类药物的中国难治性癌痛患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study.

Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Methadone has shown effectiveness in pain control in patients with cancer who are intolerant to other opioids in China. However, the optimal strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids in refractory cancer pain remains debatable. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of a 3-day switch (3DS) strategy for methadone conversion in patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30-day medical records of 70 patients with refractory cancer pain who used a 3DS strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids from July 2018 to December 2022. The 3DS strategy indicated that the methadone dose was increased by one third every day for 3 days. Data on the rate of successful conversion, the time to stable analgesia after conversion, the conversion efficiency, the corrected QT (QTc) interval, the actual conversion ratios, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life were analyzed.

Results: Seventy patients received 3DS methadone conversion and 64 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty patients (78%) achieved stable analgesia, and the median time to stable analgesia was 8.14 ± 2.70 (range 6-14) days. The average dose of methadone was 77.94 ± 42.74 mg. The most common AEs (≥ 10%) included constipation, dry mouth, nausea, and cold sweats. The incidence of constipation was reduced post-methadone conversion, and a statistically significant but asymptomatic prolongation of the QTc interval was observed. Additionally, the actual conversion ratios were lower than Ayonrinde's recommended ratios.

Conclusions: The 3DS strategy for methadone conversion is applicable in Chinese patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信