消化道选择性净化后胰头切除术中细菌的转移和耐药性模式--倾向评分匹配分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nicolas Mibelli , Florian Oehme , Olga Radulova-Mauersberger , Anne-Christin Selbmann , Felix Merboth , Sebastian Hempel , Marius Distler , Jürgen Weitz , Christian Teske
{"title":"消化道选择性净化后胰头切除术中细菌的转移和耐药性模式--倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Nicolas Mibelli ,&nbsp;Florian Oehme ,&nbsp;Olga Radulova-Mauersberger ,&nbsp;Anne-Christin Selbmann ,&nbsp;Felix Merboth ,&nbsp;Sebastian Hempel ,&nbsp;Marius Distler ,&nbsp;Jürgen Weitz ,&nbsp;Christian Teske","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatic head resection is associated with postoperative morbidity, primarily because of infectious complications. The microbiota in these infections is crucial, and selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) aims to mitigate this risk by targeting pathogenic organisms while preserving beneficial flora. This study aimed to determine the effect of SDD on bacterial shifts and resistance patterns in pancreatic head resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients who underwent pancreatic head resection either between January 2012 and August 2018 (non-SDD group) or between January 2019 and December 2021 (SDD group) were included. Propensity score–matched analysis was performed to compare the bacterial presence and resistance patterns in bile duct smear tests and postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Positive bile duct smear tests were observed more often in the non-SDD group (63.5%) than in the SDD group (51.0%). Moreover, the SDD group exhibited a significant reduction in the median number of bacterial species in the bile ducts compared with the non-SDD group (<em>P</em> = .04). However, a notable increase in gram-negative species was observed in the SDD group. The SDD group experienced higher rates of postoperative complications, including relevant pancreatic fistulas (24.8% in the SDD group vs 11.6% in the non-SDD group; <em>P</em> &lt; .01) and delayed gastric emptying (33.8% in the SDD group vs 21.9% in the non-SDD group; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). No significant difference in antibiotic resistance patterns was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SDD in pancreatic head resection reduces bacterial load in the biliary tract, but it is associated with a shift toward more gram-negative species and higher rates of severe postoperative complications. Our findings suggest that SDD may negatively affect postoperative outcomes and should be carefully considered in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"28 11","pages":"Pages 1844-1852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial shift and resistance pattern in pancreatic head resections after selective decontamination of the digestive tract – a propensity score-matched analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Mibelli ,&nbsp;Florian Oehme ,&nbsp;Olga Radulova-Mauersberger ,&nbsp;Anne-Christin Selbmann ,&nbsp;Felix Merboth ,&nbsp;Sebastian Hempel ,&nbsp;Marius Distler ,&nbsp;Jürgen Weitz ,&nbsp;Christian Teske\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatic head resection is associated with postoperative morbidity, primarily because of infectious complications. The microbiota in these infections is crucial, and selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) aims to mitigate this risk by targeting pathogenic organisms while preserving beneficial flora. This study aimed to determine the effect of SDD on bacterial shifts and resistance patterns in pancreatic head resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients who underwent pancreatic head resection either between January 2012 and August 2018 (non-SDD group) or between January 2019 and December 2021 (SDD group) were included. Propensity score–matched analysis was performed to compare the bacterial presence and resistance patterns in bile duct smear tests and postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Positive bile duct smear tests were observed more often in the non-SDD group (63.5%) than in the SDD group (51.0%). Moreover, the SDD group exhibited a significant reduction in the median number of bacterial species in the bile ducts compared with the non-SDD group (<em>P</em> = .04). However, a notable increase in gram-negative species was observed in the SDD group. The SDD group experienced higher rates of postoperative complications, including relevant pancreatic fistulas (24.8% in the SDD group vs 11.6% in the non-SDD group; <em>P</em> &lt; .01) and delayed gastric emptying (33.8% in the SDD group vs 21.9% in the non-SDD group; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). No significant difference in antibiotic resistance patterns was observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SDD in pancreatic head resection reduces bacterial load in the biliary tract, but it is associated with a shift toward more gram-negative species and higher rates of severe postoperative complications. Our findings suggest that SDD may negatively affect postoperative outcomes and should be carefully considered in clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1844-1852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X24006000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X24006000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰头切除术与术后发病率有关,主要是由于感染并发症。这些感染中的微生物群至关重要,而消化道选择性净化(SDD)旨在通过在保留有益菌群的同时靶向致病菌来降低这一风险。本研究的重点是 SDD 对胰头切除术中细菌迁移和耐药性模式的影响:纳入2012年1月至2018年8月期间(非SDD组)或2019年1月至2021年12月期间(SDD组)接受胰头切除术的所有患者。进行倾向得分匹配分析,比较胆管涂片检查中细菌的存在和耐药模式以及术后并发症:结果:非 SDD 组(63.5%)的胆管涂片检查阳性率高于 SDD 组(51%)。此外,与非 SDD 组相比,SDD 组胆管中细菌种类的中位数明显减少(P=0.04)。不过,在 SDD 组中观察到革兰氏阴性菌种明显增加。SDD 组术后并发症发生率较高,包括相关的胰瘘(24.8% 对 11.6%,P=0.04):胰头切除术中的 SDD 可减少胆道内的细菌负荷,但会导致更多的革兰氏阴性菌和更高的术后严重并发症发生率。这些研究结果表明,SDD 可能会对术后效果产生负面影响,在临床实践中应慎重考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial shift and resistance pattern in pancreatic head resections after selective decontamination of the digestive tract – a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Pancreatic head resection is associated with postoperative morbidity, primarily because of infectious complications. The microbiota in these infections is crucial, and selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) aims to mitigate this risk by targeting pathogenic organisms while preserving beneficial flora. This study aimed to determine the effect of SDD on bacterial shifts and resistance patterns in pancreatic head resection.

Methods

All patients who underwent pancreatic head resection either between January 2012 and August 2018 (non-SDD group) or between January 2019 and December 2021 (SDD group) were included. Propensity score–matched analysis was performed to compare the bacterial presence and resistance patterns in bile duct smear tests and postoperative complications.

Results

Positive bile duct smear tests were observed more often in the non-SDD group (63.5%) than in the SDD group (51.0%). Moreover, the SDD group exhibited a significant reduction in the median number of bacterial species in the bile ducts compared with the non-SDD group (P = .04). However, a notable increase in gram-negative species was observed in the SDD group. The SDD group experienced higher rates of postoperative complications, including relevant pancreatic fistulas (24.8% in the SDD group vs 11.6% in the non-SDD group; P < .01) and delayed gastric emptying (33.8% in the SDD group vs 21.9% in the non-SDD group; P < .01). No significant difference in antibiotic resistance patterns was observed.

Conclusion

SDD in pancreatic head resection reduces bacterial load in the biliary tract, but it is associated with a shift toward more gram-negative species and higher rates of severe postoperative complications. Our findings suggest that SDD may negatively affect postoperative outcomes and should be carefully considered in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信