大多无害?临床实践指南需要进一步考虑心理疗法的不良反应。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Stephen Allison, Jeffrey Cl Looi, Steve Kisely, Tarun Bastiampillai
{"title":"大多无害?临床实践指南需要进一步考虑心理疗法的不良反应。","authors":"Stephen Allison, Jeffrey Cl Looi, Steve Kisely, Tarun Bastiampillai","doi":"10.1177/10398562241282736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines on mood disorders recommend psychotherapy as foundational care for patients with acute depression with minimal discussion of any potential adverse effects. Randomised controlled trial evidence on psychotherapy adverse effects is limited. This is problematic because clinicians must balance the benefits of treatment against the harms, and clinical decisions become skewed without data on adverse effects. We suggest that clinical practice guidelines should be more guarded about recommending psychotherapy and add consensus statements on adverse effects for informed consent and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mostly harmless? Clinical practice guidelines need further consideration of psychotherapy adverse effects.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Allison, Jeffrey Cl Looi, Steve Kisely, Tarun Bastiampillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10398562241282736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines on mood disorders recommend psychotherapy as foundational care for patients with acute depression with minimal discussion of any potential adverse effects. Randomised controlled trial evidence on psychotherapy adverse effects is limited. This is problematic because clinicians must balance the benefits of treatment against the harms, and clinical decisions become skewed without data on adverse effects. We suggest that clinical practice guidelines should be more guarded about recommending psychotherapy and add consensus statements on adverse effects for informed consent and clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241282736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241282736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚和新西兰皇家精神病学院关于情绪障碍的临床实践指南建议将心理治疗作为急性抑郁症患者的基础治疗,并尽量少讨论任何潜在的不良反应。有关心理治疗不良反应的随机对照试验证据十分有限。这很成问题,因为临床医生必须在治疗的益处和害处之间进行权衡,如果没有关于不良反应的数据,临床决策就会出现偏差。我们建议,临床实践指南在推荐心理疗法时应更加谨慎,并增加有关不良反应的共识声明,以利于知情同意和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mostly harmless? Clinical practice guidelines need further consideration of psychotherapy adverse effects.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines on mood disorders recommend psychotherapy as foundational care for patients with acute depression with minimal discussion of any potential adverse effects. Randomised controlled trial evidence on psychotherapy adverse effects is limited. This is problematic because clinicians must balance the benefits of treatment against the harms, and clinical decisions become skewed without data on adverse effects. We suggest that clinical practice guidelines should be more guarded about recommending psychotherapy and add consensus statements on adverse effects for informed consent and clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信