接口死腔对 T 片通气过程中实现设定 FiO2 变化所需时间的影响:面罩是稳定新生儿状态的最佳接口吗?

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kolbrun Gunnarsdottir, Ben J Stenson, Elizabeth E Foglia, Vishal Kapadia, Thomas Drevhammar, Snorri Donaldsson
{"title":"接口死腔对 T 片通气过程中实现设定 FiO2 变化所需时间的影响:面罩是稳定新生儿状态的最佳接口吗?","authors":"Kolbrun Gunnarsdottir, Ben J Stenson, Elizabeth E Foglia, Vishal Kapadia, Thomas Drevhammar, Snorri Donaldsson","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>T-piece is recommended for respiratory support during neonatal stabilisation. Bench studies have shown a delay >30 s in achieving changes in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) at the airway when using the T-piece. Using a face mask adds dead space (DS) to the patient airway. We hypothesised that adding face mask to T-piece systems adversely affects the time required for a change in FiO<sub>2</sub> to reach the patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neopuff (Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) and rPAP (Inspiration Healthcare, Croydon, UK) were used to ventilate a test lung. DS equivalent to neonatal face masks was added between the T-piece and test lung. Additionally, rPAP was tested with nasal prongs. Time course for change in FiO<sub>2</sub> to be achieved at the airway was measured for increase (0.3-0.6) and decrease (1.0-0.5) in FiO<sub>2</sub>. Primary outcome was time to reach FiO<sub>2</sub>+/-0.05 of the set target. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean time to reach the primary outcome between different DS volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all experiments, the mean time to reach the primary outcome was significantly shorter for rPAP with prongs compared with Neopuff and rPAP with face mask DS (p<0.001). The largest observed difference occurred when testing a decrease in FiO<sub>2</sub> with 10 mL tidal volume (TV) without leakage (18.3 s for rPAP with prongs vs 153.4 s for Neopuff with face mask DS). The shortest observed time was 13.3 s when increasing FiO<sub>2</sub> with 10 mL TV with prongs with leakage and the longest time was 172.7 s when decreasing FiO<sub>2</sub> with 4 mL TV and added face mask DS without leak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a delay in achieving changes in oxygen delivery at the airway during simulated ventilation attributable to the mask volume. This delay was greatly reduced when using nasal prongs as an interface. This should be examined in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of interface dead space on the time taken to achieve changes in set FiO<sub>2</sub> during T-piece ventilation: is face mask the optimal interface for neonatal stabilisation?\",\"authors\":\"Kolbrun Gunnarsdottir, Ben J Stenson, Elizabeth E Foglia, Vishal Kapadia, Thomas Drevhammar, Snorri Donaldsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>T-piece is recommended for respiratory support during neonatal stabilisation. Bench studies have shown a delay >30 s in achieving changes in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) at the airway when using the T-piece. Using a face mask adds dead space (DS) to the patient airway. We hypothesised that adding face mask to T-piece systems adversely affects the time required for a change in FiO<sub>2</sub> to reach the patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neopuff (Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) and rPAP (Inspiration Healthcare, Croydon, UK) were used to ventilate a test lung. DS equivalent to neonatal face masks was added between the T-piece and test lung. Additionally, rPAP was tested with nasal prongs. Time course for change in FiO<sub>2</sub> to be achieved at the airway was measured for increase (0.3-0.6) and decrease (1.0-0.5) in FiO<sub>2</sub>. Primary outcome was time to reach FiO<sub>2</sub>+/-0.05 of the set target. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean time to reach the primary outcome between different DS volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all experiments, the mean time to reach the primary outcome was significantly shorter for rPAP with prongs compared with Neopuff and rPAP with face mask DS (p<0.001). The largest observed difference occurred when testing a decrease in FiO<sub>2</sub> with 10 mL tidal volume (TV) without leakage (18.3 s for rPAP with prongs vs 153.4 s for Neopuff with face mask DS). The shortest observed time was 13.3 s when increasing FiO<sub>2</sub> with 10 mL TV with prongs with leakage and the longest time was 172.7 s when decreasing FiO<sub>2</sub> with 4 mL TV and added face mask DS without leak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a delay in achieving changes in oxygen delivery at the airway during simulated ventilation attributable to the mask volume. This delay was greatly reduced when using nasal prongs as an interface. This should be examined in clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议在新生儿病情稳定期间使用 T 形呼吸器进行呼吸支持。工作台研究表明,使用 T 型面罩时,气道处实现吸入氧分数 (FiO2) 变化的时间延迟大于 30 秒。使用面罩会增加患者气道的死腔(DS)。我们推测,在 T 型喉罩系统中添加面罩会对 FiO2 的变化到达患者所需的时间产生不利影响:方法:使用 Neopuff(新西兰奥克兰 Fisher and Paykel 公司)和 rPAP(英国克罗伊登 Inspiration Healthcare 公司)为测试肺通气。在 T 型件和测试肺之间添加了相当于新生儿面罩的 DS。此外,还使用鼻刺对 rPAP 进行了测试。测量气道达到 FiO2 变化的时间过程,分别为 FiO2 上升(0.3-0.6)和下降(1.0-0.5)。主要结果是达到设定目标 FiO2+/-0.05 的时间。采用单因素方差分析比较不同 DS 容量之间达到主要结果的平均时间:在所有实验中,与 Neopuff 和使用面罩 DS 的 rPAP(p2,10 毫升潮气量 (TV),无泄漏)相比,使用刺针的 rPAP 达到主要结果的平均时间明显更短(使用刺针的 rPAP 为 18.3 秒,使用面罩 DS 的 Neopuff 为 153.4 秒)。观察到的最短时间为 13.3 秒,当使用 10 毫升潮气量增加 FiO2 并使用穿刺器时有泄漏,最长时间为 172.7 秒,当使用 4 毫升潮气量减少 FiO2 并添加面罩 DS 时无泄漏:结论:在模拟通气过程中,由于面罩容积的原因,实现气道输氧变化存在延迟。结论:在模拟通气过程中,由于面罩容积的原因,气道输氧量的变化存在延迟,而使用鼻刺作为接口时,这种延迟会大大减少。这一点应在临床试验中加以研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of interface dead space on the time taken to achieve changes in set FiO2 during T-piece ventilation: is face mask the optimal interface for neonatal stabilisation?

Background: T-piece is recommended for respiratory support during neonatal stabilisation. Bench studies have shown a delay >30 s in achieving changes in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at the airway when using the T-piece. Using a face mask adds dead space (DS) to the patient airway. We hypothesised that adding face mask to T-piece systems adversely affects the time required for a change in FiO2 to reach the patient.

Methods: Neopuff (Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) and rPAP (Inspiration Healthcare, Croydon, UK) were used to ventilate a test lung. DS equivalent to neonatal face masks was added between the T-piece and test lung. Additionally, rPAP was tested with nasal prongs. Time course for change in FiO2 to be achieved at the airway was measured for increase (0.3-0.6) and decrease (1.0-0.5) in FiO2. Primary outcome was time to reach FiO2+/-0.05 of the set target. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean time to reach the primary outcome between different DS volumes.

Results: In all experiments, the mean time to reach the primary outcome was significantly shorter for rPAP with prongs compared with Neopuff and rPAP with face mask DS (p<0.001). The largest observed difference occurred when testing a decrease in FiO2 with 10 mL tidal volume (TV) without leakage (18.3 s for rPAP with prongs vs 153.4 s for Neopuff with face mask DS). The shortest observed time was 13.3 s when increasing FiO2 with 10 mL TV with prongs with leakage and the longest time was 172.7 s when decreasing FiO2 with 4 mL TV and added face mask DS without leak.

Conclusion: There was a delay in achieving changes in oxygen delivery at the airway during simulated ventilation attributable to the mask volume. This delay was greatly reduced when using nasal prongs as an interface. This should be examined in clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信