威廉-莎士比亚的《麦克白》(评论)

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Christopher Crosbie
{"title":"威廉-莎士比亚的《麦克白》(评论)","authors":"Christopher Crosbie","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a936323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Macbeth</em> by William Shakespeare <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christopher Crosbie (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Macbeth</em>, by William Shakespeare, directed by Simon Godwin, The Shakespeare Company, Washington, D.C. (April 9 – May 5, 2024) <p>The penultimate figure in Jacques’ “seven ages of man” soliloquy brilliantly conveys the vulnerabilities of old age, presenting us with a person living in “a world too wide for his shrunk shank” (2.7.160-1). As the body weakens for this figure, the surrounding world seems larger and more unsettling, perhaps dangerous. This rhetorical move is spatial but the effect cinematic. We can almost feel the distortions happening within and around the isolated individual, exposed in a world where agency itself seems to diminish.</p> <p>It may seem unnatural to bring the forest of Arden marching toward Scotland, yet this dialectic of shrinking figures and a world of overwhelming scope informs so much of Simon Godwin’s compelling production of <em>Macbeth</em>, adapted by Emily Burns and starring Ralph Fiennes and Indira Varma at the Shakespeare Theatre Company in Washington, DC. The production presents a world of immense, unstoppable violence, a place where tsunamis of human brutality relentlessly sweep across everything in their path; at the same time, it gives us, in the very best ways, a claustrophobic world where shattered individuals, more often than not, only serve to make matters worse. Rather than worrying whether Shakespeare offers us a national or personal tragedy, this <em>Macbeth</em> effectively marshals its interest in both the play’s broad scope and its sense of intimate collapse to yield a tale as much about fatigue and despair as about sound and fury.</p> <p>Performed in a warehouse away from the STC’s usual venue, Godwin’s <em>Macbeth</em> immediately announces its status as a different kind of theatrical event, immersive virtually from the outset. The warehouse’s outer section houses concessions, ad hoc restrooms, modest seating, and a curiously large sculpture of the letter “M,” a somewhat odd accent choice, but one that doesn’t quite detract from the general atmosphere. Mist descends from above, filtering through hanging lighting, which guides the audience past a curtained border into a cavernous space designed to look like a section of a city ravaged by war. Three trees, inexplicably preserved from the destruction, stand spaced apart, overlooking a scene of otherwise complete desolation. Here, the audience encounters a detailed wasteland strewn with rubble, the scorched remnants of civilization half buried throughout, as two paths snake their way toward the main theater space, not yet fully visible itself. Whether intentional or not, the artifacts still legible amid the rubble point their way toward the play that will follow. A <strong>[End Page 399]</strong> child’s red scooter, emblem of carefree mobility and possibility, lays crushed; the wire framing of a bed’s boxspring rests beside this, a twisted mockery of a space where, once, someone was able to sleep. A sedan of indeterminate make sits nearby, glowing from within as the ceaseless crackling of embers emerges from hidden speakers. The piercing sounds of flyovers by unseen jets informs the audience that this devastation represents the result of an ongoing conflict, and that they are entering an imaginary version of what is all-too-real for all-too-many, one where death, loss, and destruction can be visited from unseen forces well above and beyond one’s own limited reach. Shrunk shanks and wide worlds, indeed. And, as this play bears out, not dependent upon age for making the force of this disparity fully felt.</p> <p>This wasteland remains invisible to the audience during the performance itself, and the main stage brings a marked shift in perspective. Set design here is smaller in scale: a modest rectangular stage thrusts outward; broad center stairs ascend, then branch to thinner ones on the left and right; four doors stand on the sides, two at the base and two at the apex of the narrower stairs. After such sweeping scope, this is the audience’s world for the entirety of the play itself, giving the performance a sense of intimacy, of localizing the action’s trauma in more particular and personal terms. Every bit of the stage remains whole and intact, save two sections, one front-left and one...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macbeth by William Shakespeare (review)\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Crosbie\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cdr.2024.a936323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Macbeth</em> by William Shakespeare <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Christopher Crosbie (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Macbeth</em>, by William Shakespeare, directed by Simon Godwin, The Shakespeare Company, Washington, D.C. (April 9 – May 5, 2024) <p>The penultimate figure in Jacques’ “seven ages of man” soliloquy brilliantly conveys the vulnerabilities of old age, presenting us with a person living in “a world too wide for his shrunk shank” (2.7.160-1). As the body weakens for this figure, the surrounding world seems larger and more unsettling, perhaps dangerous. This rhetorical move is spatial but the effect cinematic. We can almost feel the distortions happening within and around the isolated individual, exposed in a world where agency itself seems to diminish.</p> <p>It may seem unnatural to bring the forest of Arden marching toward Scotland, yet this dialectic of shrinking figures and a world of overwhelming scope informs so much of Simon Godwin’s compelling production of <em>Macbeth</em>, adapted by Emily Burns and starring Ralph Fiennes and Indira Varma at the Shakespeare Theatre Company in Washington, DC. The production presents a world of immense, unstoppable violence, a place where tsunamis of human brutality relentlessly sweep across everything in their path; at the same time, it gives us, in the very best ways, a claustrophobic world where shattered individuals, more often than not, only serve to make matters worse. Rather than worrying whether Shakespeare offers us a national or personal tragedy, this <em>Macbeth</em> effectively marshals its interest in both the play’s broad scope and its sense of intimate collapse to yield a tale as much about fatigue and despair as about sound and fury.</p> <p>Performed in a warehouse away from the STC’s usual venue, Godwin’s <em>Macbeth</em> immediately announces its status as a different kind of theatrical event, immersive virtually from the outset. The warehouse’s outer section houses concessions, ad hoc restrooms, modest seating, and a curiously large sculpture of the letter “M,” a somewhat odd accent choice, but one that doesn’t quite detract from the general atmosphere. Mist descends from above, filtering through hanging lighting, which guides the audience past a curtained border into a cavernous space designed to look like a section of a city ravaged by war. Three trees, inexplicably preserved from the destruction, stand spaced apart, overlooking a scene of otherwise complete desolation. Here, the audience encounters a detailed wasteland strewn with rubble, the scorched remnants of civilization half buried throughout, as two paths snake their way toward the main theater space, not yet fully visible itself. Whether intentional or not, the artifacts still legible amid the rubble point their way toward the play that will follow. A <strong>[End Page 399]</strong> child’s red scooter, emblem of carefree mobility and possibility, lays crushed; the wire framing of a bed’s boxspring rests beside this, a twisted mockery of a space where, once, someone was able to sleep. A sedan of indeterminate make sits nearby, glowing from within as the ceaseless crackling of embers emerges from hidden speakers. The piercing sounds of flyovers by unseen jets informs the audience that this devastation represents the result of an ongoing conflict, and that they are entering an imaginary version of what is all-too-real for all-too-many, one where death, loss, and destruction can be visited from unseen forces well above and beyond one’s own limited reach. Shrunk shanks and wide worlds, indeed. And, as this play bears out, not dependent upon age for making the force of this disparity fully felt.</p> <p>This wasteland remains invisible to the audience during the performance itself, and the main stage brings a marked shift in perspective. Set design here is smaller in scale: a modest rectangular stage thrusts outward; broad center stairs ascend, then branch to thinner ones on the left and right; four doors stand on the sides, two at the base and two at the apex of the narrower stairs. After such sweeping scope, this is the audience’s world for the entirety of the play itself, giving the performance a sense of intimacy, of localizing the action’s trauma in more particular and personal terms. Every bit of the stage remains whole and intact, save two sections, one front-left and one...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a936323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a936323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 麦克白》,威廉-莎士比亚,西蒙-戈德温执导,莎士比亚剧团,华盛顿特区(2024 年 4 月 9 日至 5 月 5 日)雅克 "人的七个年龄 "独白中的倒数第二个人物出色地传达了老年的脆弱性,向我们展示了一个生活在 "对他萎缩的小腿来说过于宽广的世界"(2.7.160-1)中的人。随着这个人物身体的衰弱,周围的世界显得更大、更令人不安,也许是危险的。这种修辞手法是空间性的,但效果却是电影式的。我们几乎可以感受到这个孤立的个体内部和周围发生的扭曲,他暴露在一个能动性似乎被削弱的世界中。将阿登森林带向苏格兰似乎有些不自然,但这种人物缩小与世界广阔的辩证关系在西蒙-戈德温引人注目的《麦克白》中体现得淋漓尽致,该剧由艾米莉-伯恩斯(Emily Burns)改编,拉尔夫-费因斯(Ralph Fiennes)和英迪拉-瓦尔玛(Indira Varma)主演,在华盛顿特区的莎士比亚剧团上演。这部作品展现了一个巨大的、不可阻挡的暴力世界,一个人类残暴的海啸无情地席卷一切的地方;同时,它以最好的方式为我们呈现了一个幽闭恐怖的世界,在这个世界里,破碎的个人往往只会让事情变得更糟。这部《麦克白》没有纠结于莎士比亚为我们呈现的是国家悲剧还是个人悲剧,而是有效地调动了观众对该剧的兴趣,既有广阔的视野,又有亲切的崩塌感,从而产生了一个既有声色犬马,又有疲惫绝望的故事。戈德温的《麦克白》在远离 STC 常驻场地的一个仓库中演出,一开始就表明了它是一场与众不同的戏剧活动,几乎让人身临其境。仓库的外围区域设有小卖部、临时洗手间、简陋的座位,以及一个奇怪的大型字母 "M "雕塑。雾气从上方弥漫而下,通过悬挂的照明灯过滤,引导观众穿过帷幕边界,进入一个巨大的空间,这个空间的设计看起来像是被战争蹂躏过的城市的一部分。三棵树莫名其妙地从毁灭中保留了下来,间隔地矗立着,俯瞰着一片荒芜的景象。在这里,观众看到的是一片散落着瓦砾的荒地,文明的焦土残骸被半掩埋,两条小路蜿蜒通向主剧场,而主剧场本身尚未完全显现。无论有意还是无意,废墟中仍清晰可辨的文物都指向了接下来的戏剧。一辆象征着无忧无虑的流动性和可能性的儿童红色滑板车被压得粉碎;旁边放着一张床的弹簧床的铁丝框架,扭曲地嘲弄着曾经有人能够入睡的空间。附近停放着一辆型号不详的轿车,车内散发着光芒,隐蔽的扬声器里不断传出噼噼啪啪的燃烧声。看不见的喷气式飞机飞过时发出的刺耳声音告诉观众,这场灾难是一场持续不断的冲突造成的,他们正在进入一个想象中的版本,在这里,死亡、损失和毁灭可能来自看不见的力量,远远超出人们有限的能力范围。的确,"矮个子 "和 "广阔天地"。正如本剧所证明的那样,这种差异的力量并不取决于年龄。在演出过程中,观众始终看不到这片荒原,而在主舞台上,观众的视角发生了明显的变化。这里的布景设计规模较小:一个不大的长方形舞台向外伸展;中间宽阔的楼梯向上延伸,然后在左右两侧分出较细的楼梯;四扇门矗立在两侧,两扇位于较窄楼梯的底部,两扇位于较窄楼梯的顶端。在如此广阔的范围之后,这就是观众在整部剧中的世界,给人一种亲切感,使动作的创伤更加具体和个人化。除了左前方和右前方的两个区域外,舞台的每一个部分都保持完整无损...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macbeth by William Shakespeare (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Macbeth by William Shakespeare
  • Christopher Crosbie (bio)
Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, directed by Simon Godwin, The Shakespeare Company, Washington, D.C. (April 9 – May 5, 2024)

The penultimate figure in Jacques’ “seven ages of man” soliloquy brilliantly conveys the vulnerabilities of old age, presenting us with a person living in “a world too wide for his shrunk shank” (2.7.160-1). As the body weakens for this figure, the surrounding world seems larger and more unsettling, perhaps dangerous. This rhetorical move is spatial but the effect cinematic. We can almost feel the distortions happening within and around the isolated individual, exposed in a world where agency itself seems to diminish.

It may seem unnatural to bring the forest of Arden marching toward Scotland, yet this dialectic of shrinking figures and a world of overwhelming scope informs so much of Simon Godwin’s compelling production of Macbeth, adapted by Emily Burns and starring Ralph Fiennes and Indira Varma at the Shakespeare Theatre Company in Washington, DC. The production presents a world of immense, unstoppable violence, a place where tsunamis of human brutality relentlessly sweep across everything in their path; at the same time, it gives us, in the very best ways, a claustrophobic world where shattered individuals, more often than not, only serve to make matters worse. Rather than worrying whether Shakespeare offers us a national or personal tragedy, this Macbeth effectively marshals its interest in both the play’s broad scope and its sense of intimate collapse to yield a tale as much about fatigue and despair as about sound and fury.

Performed in a warehouse away from the STC’s usual venue, Godwin’s Macbeth immediately announces its status as a different kind of theatrical event, immersive virtually from the outset. The warehouse’s outer section houses concessions, ad hoc restrooms, modest seating, and a curiously large sculpture of the letter “M,” a somewhat odd accent choice, but one that doesn’t quite detract from the general atmosphere. Mist descends from above, filtering through hanging lighting, which guides the audience past a curtained border into a cavernous space designed to look like a section of a city ravaged by war. Three trees, inexplicably preserved from the destruction, stand spaced apart, overlooking a scene of otherwise complete desolation. Here, the audience encounters a detailed wasteland strewn with rubble, the scorched remnants of civilization half buried throughout, as two paths snake their way toward the main theater space, not yet fully visible itself. Whether intentional or not, the artifacts still legible amid the rubble point their way toward the play that will follow. A [End Page 399] child’s red scooter, emblem of carefree mobility and possibility, lays crushed; the wire framing of a bed’s boxspring rests beside this, a twisted mockery of a space where, once, someone was able to sleep. A sedan of indeterminate make sits nearby, glowing from within as the ceaseless crackling of embers emerges from hidden speakers. The piercing sounds of flyovers by unseen jets informs the audience that this devastation represents the result of an ongoing conflict, and that they are entering an imaginary version of what is all-too-real for all-too-many, one where death, loss, and destruction can be visited from unseen forces well above and beyond one’s own limited reach. Shrunk shanks and wide worlds, indeed. And, as this play bears out, not dependent upon age for making the force of this disparity fully felt.

This wasteland remains invisible to the audience during the performance itself, and the main stage brings a marked shift in perspective. Set design here is smaller in scale: a modest rectangular stage thrusts outward; broad center stairs ascend, then branch to thinner ones on the left and right; four doors stand on the sides, two at the base and two at the apex of the narrower stairs. After such sweeping scope, this is the audience’s world for the entirety of the play itself, giving the performance a sense of intimacy, of localizing the action’s trauma in more particular and personal terms. Every bit of the stage remains whole and intact, save two sections, one front-left and one...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信