离职决定:全科住院医生主任离职调查。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282
Douglas H Fernald, Christina M Hester, Steven R Brown
{"title":"离职决定:全科住院医生主任离职调查。","authors":"Douglas H Fernald, Christina M Hester, Steven R Brown","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Program director (PD) tenure, continuity, and stability may enhance residency program quality, yet many PDs do not stay long in their positions. No prior study has taken a comprehensive census of departing PDs to determine reasons for leaving the role. This study aimed to survey all exiting family medicine (FM) PDs to identify decision factors contributing to their departure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2021 to October 2022, we sent a web-based exit survey to all departing FM PDs. The survey asked departing PDs to rate the strength of 36 factors in the decision to exit the PD role in terms of job satisfaction, accomplishments, career choices, workload, preparation, expectations, and support. We used the Fisher exact test to assess all 36 decision factors and PD characteristics for significant associations with shorter or longer PD tenures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDs submitted 73 surveys out of 109 invitations (67.0% response). We analyzed 68 with complete data. The median PD tenure was 5.6 years (mean 6.9 years). Most respondents (66/68, 97.1%) identified three or more strong factors in their decision to leave. The strongest factors reflected stable residency programs, an established succession plan, a desire for more personal/family time, and a sense that the time was right. PDs with tenures longer than 3 years were more likely to have completed the National Institute for Program Director Development (<i>P</i>=.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PDs leave the position for multiple reasons, often positive, and not necessarily due to lack of support and preparation. Further exploration of decision factors may inform strategies to support PDs in their positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Departure Decisions: Exit Survey of Family Medicine Residency Directors.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas H Fernald, Christina M Hester, Steven R Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Program director (PD) tenure, continuity, and stability may enhance residency program quality, yet many PDs do not stay long in their positions. No prior study has taken a comprehensive census of departing PDs to determine reasons for leaving the role. This study aimed to survey all exiting family medicine (FM) PDs to identify decision factors contributing to their departure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2021 to October 2022, we sent a web-based exit survey to all departing FM PDs. The survey asked departing PDs to rate the strength of 36 factors in the decision to exit the PD role in terms of job satisfaction, accomplishments, career choices, workload, preparation, expectations, and support. We used the Fisher exact test to assess all 36 decision factors and PD characteristics for significant associations with shorter or longer PD tenures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDs submitted 73 surveys out of 109 invitations (67.0% response). We analyzed 68 with complete data. The median PD tenure was 5.6 years (mean 6.9 years). Most respondents (66/68, 97.1%) identified three or more strong factors in their decision to leave. The strongest factors reflected stable residency programs, an established succession plan, a desire for more personal/family time, and a sense that the time was right. PDs with tenures longer than 3 years were more likely to have completed the National Institute for Program Director Development (<i>P</i>=.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PDs leave the position for multiple reasons, often positive, and not necessarily due to lack of support and preparation. Further exploration of decision factors may inform strategies to support PDs in their positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.770282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目标:项目主任(PD)的任期、连续性和稳定性可能会提高住院医师培训项目的质量,但许多项目主任在其职位上的时间并不长。此前没有任何研究对即将离职的项目主任进行全面普查,以确定其离职的原因。本研究旨在对所有即将离职的家庭医学(FM)住院医生进行调查,以确定导致他们离职的决定因素:从 2021 年 10 月到 2022 年 10 月,我们向所有即将离职的全科医生发送了一份基于网络的离职调查。调查要求离职的临床医生从工作满意度、成就、职业选择、工作量、准备工作、期望和支持等方面对决定退出临床医生角色的 36 个因素的强度进行评分。我们使用费舍尔精确检验来评估所有 36 个决定因素和 PD 特征与 PD 任期长短的显著关联:在 109 份邀请函中,专业人员提交了 73 份调查问卷(回复率为 67.0%)。我们分析了 68 份完整数据。PD 任期的中位数为 5.6 年(平均 6.9 年)。大多数受访者(66/68,97.1%)认为,有三个或三个以上强有力的因素促使他们做出离开的决定。最主要的因素包括:稳定的住院医师培训项目、既定的继任计划、希望有更多的个人/家庭时间以及感觉时机成熟。任期超过 3 年的项目主任更有可能完成了国家项目主任发展学院的课程(P=.001):项目主任离职的原因是多方面的,通常都是积极的,并不一定是因为缺乏支持和准备。对决定因素的进一步探讨可为支持项目主任在其岗位上工作的策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Departure Decisions: Exit Survey of Family Medicine Residency Directors.

Background and objectives: Program director (PD) tenure, continuity, and stability may enhance residency program quality, yet many PDs do not stay long in their positions. No prior study has taken a comprehensive census of departing PDs to determine reasons for leaving the role. This study aimed to survey all exiting family medicine (FM) PDs to identify decision factors contributing to their departure.

Methods: From October 2021 to October 2022, we sent a web-based exit survey to all departing FM PDs. The survey asked departing PDs to rate the strength of 36 factors in the decision to exit the PD role in terms of job satisfaction, accomplishments, career choices, workload, preparation, expectations, and support. We used the Fisher exact test to assess all 36 decision factors and PD characteristics for significant associations with shorter or longer PD tenures.

Results: PDs submitted 73 surveys out of 109 invitations (67.0% response). We analyzed 68 with complete data. The median PD tenure was 5.6 years (mean 6.9 years). Most respondents (66/68, 97.1%) identified three or more strong factors in their decision to leave. The strongest factors reflected stable residency programs, an established succession plan, a desire for more personal/family time, and a sense that the time was right. PDs with tenures longer than 3 years were more likely to have completed the National Institute for Program Director Development (P=.001).

Conclusions: PDs leave the position for multiple reasons, often positive, and not necessarily due to lack of support and preparation. Further exploration of decision factors may inform strategies to support PDs in their positions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信