院前动脉插管是否会延长孤立性严重脑外伤患者首次 CT 扫描的时间?一项回顾性非劣效性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michael Eichlseder, Sebastian Labenbacher, Alexander Pichler, Michael Eichinger, Thomas Kuenzer, Philipp Zoidl, Barbara Hallmann, Felix Stelzl, Nikolaus Schreiber, Paul Zajic
{"title":"院前动脉插管是否会延长孤立性严重脑外伤患者首次 CT 扫描的时间?一项回顾性非劣效性研究。","authors":"Michael Eichlseder, Sebastian Labenbacher, Alexander Pichler, Michael Eichinger, Thomas Kuenzer, Philipp Zoidl, Barbara Hallmann, Felix Stelzl, Nikolaus Schreiber, Paul Zajic","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01251-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is time to first CT scan in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury prolonged when prehospital arterial cannulation is performed? A retrospective non-inferiority study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Eichlseder, Sebastian Labenbacher, Alexander Pichler, Michael Eichinger, Thomas Kuenzer, Philipp Zoidl, Barbara Hallmann, Felix Stelzl, Nikolaus Schreiber, Paul Zajic\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-024-01251-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01251-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01251-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有创血压测量是指导创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者血液动力学管理和连续脑灌注压的院内金标准。院前血压测量可能会延误进一步治疗,因此对其使用存在争议。本研究的主要目的是验证以下假设:与院内插管相比,接受院前动脉插管的严重脑外伤患者从到达现场到首次头部计算机断层扫描(CT)的时间不会延长十分钟以上:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间在格拉茨大学医院复苏室接受治疗的 18 岁及以上孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤和院前诱导紧急麻醉的患者。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验来检验现场到达与首次头部CT之间的时间间隔的非劣效性(差值=10分钟):我们将 181 名患者的数据纳入最终分析。87名患者(48%)进行了院前动脉管路插入。院前动脉插管与首次头部CT之间的中位时间(25-75百分位数)分别为73(61-92)分钟和75(60-93)分钟。院前动脉插管在 10 分钟的范围内明显不占优势,中位差异为 1 分钟(95% CI - 6 - 7,P = 0.003):结论:与院内插管的患者相比,接受院前动脉插管的孤立性重度脑外伤患者从到达现场到首次头部 CT 的时间间隔没有延长。这支持由经验丰富的医护人员尽早进行院外动脉插管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is time to first CT scan in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury prolonged when prehospital arterial cannulation is performed? A retrospective non-inferiority study.

Background: Invasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.

Results: We included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Time-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信