{"title":"反复无法诊断的甲状腺结节:两家甲状腺诊所的经验。","authors":"Filippo Egalini, Mattia Rossi, Chiara Mele, Yanina Lizet Castillo, Francesca Maletta, Barbara Puligheddu, Ezio Ghigo, Ruth Rossetto Giaccherino, Loredana Pagano, Mauro Papotti","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6507.24.04152-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical management of repeatedly non-diagnostic thyroid nodules (RNDNs) via fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAc) is a matter of debate because current recommendations and clinical practice are not based on high-quality evidence. Our purpose was to characterize RNDNs and evaluate their clinical management in our centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 319 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US-)guided FNAc in two Italian academic hospitals between 2016 and 2020 and had previous cytology non-diagnostic result (TIR1). Clinical management and anamnestic data were retrieved, and the cytological specimens and US exams were double-blindly reviewed by two pathologists and endocrinologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of RNDNs was significantly greater in hypoechogenic nodules (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.727, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 1.090-2.735, P=0.02) and lower in nodules that had been recognized less than 10 years before (OR=0.349, 95% CI: 0.153-0.796, P=0.01). Clinicians chose to directly perform surgery on multinodular, intermediate-risk nodules (as per AACE/AME guidelines and EUTIRADS class 4), while larger (P<0.0001) and uninodular (P=0.03) lesions were further investigated with a third FNAc. Only 16 RNDNs were sent to surgery. Twelve nodules turned out to be benign goiters with a high rate of fibrosis, while only 3 were definitively malignant. However, retrospectively, all the malignant ones exhibited higher-risk ultrasound features and had an undetermined result (TIR3B) at the third cytological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-life context, RNDNs exhibited a very low rate of malignancy and were mostly long-known goiters with regressive changes, as suggested by a hypoechoic pattern. Consequently, a clinical-US surveillance approach could be cautiously hypothesized, while greater attention could be given to larger and higher-US-risk (both as EUTIRADS 4-5 and AACE/AME intermediate- and high-risk classes) nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":18690,"journal":{"name":"Minerva endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatedly non-diagnostic thyroid nodules: the experience of two thyroid clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Egalini, Mattia Rossi, Chiara Mele, Yanina Lizet Castillo, Francesca Maletta, Barbara Puligheddu, Ezio Ghigo, Ruth Rossetto Giaccherino, Loredana Pagano, Mauro Papotti\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6507.24.04152-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical management of repeatedly non-diagnostic thyroid nodules (RNDNs) via fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAc) is a matter of debate because current recommendations and clinical practice are not based on high-quality evidence. Our purpose was to characterize RNDNs and evaluate their clinical management in our centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 319 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US-)guided FNAc in two Italian academic hospitals between 2016 and 2020 and had previous cytology non-diagnostic result (TIR1). Clinical management and anamnestic data were retrieved, and the cytological specimens and US exams were double-blindly reviewed by two pathologists and endocrinologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of RNDNs was significantly greater in hypoechogenic nodules (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.727, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 1.090-2.735, P=0.02) and lower in nodules that had been recognized less than 10 years before (OR=0.349, 95% CI: 0.153-0.796, P=0.01). Clinicians chose to directly perform surgery on multinodular, intermediate-risk nodules (as per AACE/AME guidelines and EUTIRADS class 4), while larger (P<0.0001) and uninodular (P=0.03) lesions were further investigated with a third FNAc. Only 16 RNDNs were sent to surgery. Twelve nodules turned out to be benign goiters with a high rate of fibrosis, while only 3 were definitively malignant. However, retrospectively, all the malignant ones exhibited higher-risk ultrasound features and had an undetermined result (TIR3B) at the third cytological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-life context, RNDNs exhibited a very low rate of malignancy and were mostly long-known goiters with regressive changes, as suggested by a hypoechoic pattern. Consequently, a clinical-US surveillance approach could be cautiously hypothesized, while greater attention could be given to larger and higher-US-risk (both as EUTIRADS 4-5 and AACE/AME intermediate- and high-risk classes) nodules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva endocrinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6507.24.04152-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6507.24.04152-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Repeatedly non-diagnostic thyroid nodules: the experience of two thyroid clinics.
Background: The clinical management of repeatedly non-diagnostic thyroid nodules (RNDNs) via fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAc) is a matter of debate because current recommendations and clinical practice are not based on high-quality evidence. Our purpose was to characterize RNDNs and evaluate their clinical management in our centers.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included 319 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US-)guided FNAc in two Italian academic hospitals between 2016 and 2020 and had previous cytology non-diagnostic result (TIR1). Clinical management and anamnestic data were retrieved, and the cytological specimens and US exams were double-blindly reviewed by two pathologists and endocrinologists.
Results: The risk of RNDNs was significantly greater in hypoechogenic nodules (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.727, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 1.090-2.735, P=0.02) and lower in nodules that had been recognized less than 10 years before (OR=0.349, 95% CI: 0.153-0.796, P=0.01). Clinicians chose to directly perform surgery on multinodular, intermediate-risk nodules (as per AACE/AME guidelines and EUTIRADS class 4), while larger (P<0.0001) and uninodular (P=0.03) lesions were further investigated with a third FNAc. Only 16 RNDNs were sent to surgery. Twelve nodules turned out to be benign goiters with a high rate of fibrosis, while only 3 were definitively malignant. However, retrospectively, all the malignant ones exhibited higher-risk ultrasound features and had an undetermined result (TIR3B) at the third cytological evaluation.
Conclusions: In a real-life context, RNDNs exhibited a very low rate of malignancy and were mostly long-known goiters with regressive changes, as suggested by a hypoechoic pattern. Consequently, a clinical-US surveillance approach could be cautiously hypothesized, while greater attention could be given to larger and higher-US-risk (both as EUTIRADS 4-5 and AACE/AME intermediate- and high-risk classes) nodules.