核心 HEM 心理健康患者报告结果测量法的开发--针对血友病患者的新型心理健康展望测量法。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1111/hae.15085
Elizabeth Clearfield, Hsing-Yuan Chang, Ellen M. Janssen, Tabassum Majid, Donna A. Messner, Donna Coffin, Mohit Jain, Paul E. Monahan, Leonard A. Valentino, Michelle Witkop, Mark W. Skinner
{"title":"核心 HEM 心理健康患者报告结果测量法的开发--针对血友病患者的新型心理健康展望测量法。","authors":"Elizabeth Clearfield,&nbsp;Hsing-Yuan Chang,&nbsp;Ellen M. Janssen,&nbsp;Tabassum Majid,&nbsp;Donna A. Messner,&nbsp;Donna Coffin,&nbsp;Mohit Jain,&nbsp;Paul E. Monahan,&nbsp;Leonard A. Valentino,&nbsp;Michelle Witkop,&nbsp;Mark W. Skinner","doi":"10.1111/hae.15085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, no quality-of-life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty-three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub-concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The instrument is content-validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":"30 6","pages":"1309-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hae.15085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the coreHEM mental health patient-reported outcome measure – A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Clearfield,&nbsp;Hsing-Yuan Chang,&nbsp;Ellen M. Janssen,&nbsp;Tabassum Majid,&nbsp;Donna A. Messner,&nbsp;Donna Coffin,&nbsp;Mohit Jain,&nbsp;Paul E. Monahan,&nbsp;Leonard A. Valentino,&nbsp;Michelle Witkop,&nbsp;Mark W. Skinner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hae.15085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Currently, no quality-of-life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty-three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub-concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The instrument is content-validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemophilia\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"1309-1320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hae.15085\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemophilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.15085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.15085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:目前,还没有一种生活质量工具能够全面反映血友病患者的心理健康前景(MHO)这一HEM核心结果,包括接受基因治疗的潜在转变体验。目的:描述用于开发内容经过验证的患者报告结果测量方法(PROM)的方法,该方法可测量血友病患者的心理健康前景:方法:根据文献/证据综述制定的概念框架用于创建访谈指南和起草调查问卷。15 岁或 15 岁以上患有重度/中度血友病的男性有资格参加概念激发或认知汇报访谈。在对概念激发访谈进行主题分析的基础上完善了概念框架,并根据概念框架制定了 PROM 项目。认知汇报会分两轮进行,优先考虑 PROM 的相关性和理解;项目反复更新:从 300 多个已确定的 MHO 概念中构建了一个包含五个领域(耻辱、焦虑、抑郁、生活干扰和身份认同)的概念框架。53 名参与者参加了访谈。经过 32 次概念激发访谈后,对框架进行了更新,增加了 8 个新的子概念,删除了 2 个子概念。问卷的更新包括项目的增删和措辞的改进。最终的核心 HEM MHO PROM 有 26 个问题,分为两个部分(与血友病相关的一般心理健康和基因治疗部分):结论:该工具经过内容验证,可用作探索性结果。可以对 MHO 评分进行测量和比较,以便更深入地了解患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the coreHEM mental health patient-reported outcome measure – A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia

Introduction

Currently, no quality-of-life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy.

Aim

To describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia.

Methods

A conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively.

Results

A conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty-three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub-concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section).

Conclusions

The instrument is content-validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信