颈椎前路固定术后的经皮扩张气管造口术--一项倾向匹配队列回顾性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ronny Meisterfeld, Anne Queck, Alexander Carl Disch, Marius Distler, Hanns-Christoph Held, Janusz von Renesse, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Jürgen Weitz, Konrad Kamin
{"title":"颈椎前路固定术后的经皮扩张气管造口术--一项倾向匹配队列回顾性研究。","authors":"Ronny Meisterfeld, Anne Queck, Alexander Carl Disch, Marius Distler, Hanns-Christoph Held, Janusz von Renesse, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Jürgen Weitz, Konrad Kamin","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08484-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with traumatic, infectious, degenerative, and neoplastic surgical indications in the cervical spine, commonly the anterior approach is used. Often these patients require a tracheostomy necessary due to prolonged mechanical ventilation. The limited spinal mobility and proximity to the surgical site of anterior cervical spine fixation (ACSF) could pose an increased risk for complications of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT.) Importantly, PDT might raise wound infection rates of the cervical spine approach. The aim of this study is to prove safety of PDT after ACSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center study comparing patients with and without ACSF who underwent Ciaglia-single step PDT. After propensity score matching using logistic regression, we compared intra- and postprocedural complication rates. Furthermore, surgical site infections were evaluated. Putensen's definitions of complications and Clavien-Dindo's classification were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1175 patients underwent PDT between 2009 and 2021. Fifty-seven patients underwent PDT following ACSF and were matched to fifty-seven patients without ACSF. The mean interval between ACSF and PDT was 11.3 days. The overall complication rate was 19.3% in the ACSF group and 21.1% in the non-ACSF group. The mean follow-up was 388 days (± 791) in the ACSF group and 424 days (± 819) in the non-ACSF group. Life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo IV to V) were found in 1.8% of ACSF patients and 3.5% of non-ACSF patients. There were no significant differences in complication rates. No surgical site infection of the anterior spine access was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT is a feasible and safe procedure in patients after ACSF. Complication rates are comparable to patients without ACSF. Surgical site infections of ACSF are very rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy following anterior cervical spine fixation - a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ronny Meisterfeld, Anne Queck, Alexander Carl Disch, Marius Distler, Hanns-Christoph Held, Janusz von Renesse, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Jürgen Weitz, Konrad Kamin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08484-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with traumatic, infectious, degenerative, and neoplastic surgical indications in the cervical spine, commonly the anterior approach is used. Often these patients require a tracheostomy necessary due to prolonged mechanical ventilation. The limited spinal mobility and proximity to the surgical site of anterior cervical spine fixation (ACSF) could pose an increased risk for complications of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT.) Importantly, PDT might raise wound infection rates of the cervical spine approach. The aim of this study is to prove safety of PDT after ACSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center study comparing patients with and without ACSF who underwent Ciaglia-single step PDT. After propensity score matching using logistic regression, we compared intra- and postprocedural complication rates. Furthermore, surgical site infections were evaluated. Putensen's definitions of complications and Clavien-Dindo's classification were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1175 patients underwent PDT between 2009 and 2021. Fifty-seven patients underwent PDT following ACSF and were matched to fifty-seven patients without ACSF. The mean interval between ACSF and PDT was 11.3 days. The overall complication rate was 19.3% in the ACSF group and 21.1% in the non-ACSF group. The mean follow-up was 388 days (± 791) in the ACSF group and 424 days (± 819) in the non-ACSF group. Life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo IV to V) were found in 1.8% of ACSF patients and 3.5% of non-ACSF patients. There were no significant differences in complication rates. No surgical site infection of the anterior spine access was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT is a feasible and safe procedure in patients after ACSF. Complication rates are comparable to patients without ACSF. Surgical site infections of ACSF are very rare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08484-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08484-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于有外伤性、感染性、退行性和肿瘤性颈椎病手术指征的患者,通常采用前路手术。由于长期机械通气,这些患者通常需要气管造口术。颈椎前路固定术(ACSF)的脊柱活动度有限,且靠近手术部位,这可能会增加经皮扩张气管造口术(PDT)并发症的风险。本研究旨在证明 ACSF 后 PDT 的安全性:我们进行了一项回顾性单中心研究,比较了接受 Ciaglia 单步 PDT 的 ACSF 患者和未接受 ACSF 的患者。在使用逻辑回归进行倾向得分匹配后,我们比较了术中和术后并发症的发生率。此外,我们还对手术部位感染进行了评估。我们采用了 Putensen 的并发症定义和 Clavien-Dindo 的分类方法:2009年至2021年间,共有1175名患者接受了PDT手术。57名患者在接受 ACSF 后接受了 PDT,并与 57 名未接受 ACSF 的患者进行了配对。从 ACSF 到 PDT 的平均间隔时间为 11.3 天。ACSF 组的总体并发症发生率为 19.3%,非 ACSF 组为 21.1%。ACSF 组的平均随访时间为 388 天(± 791),非 ACSF 组为 424 天(± 819)。1.8%的 ACSF 患者和 3.5% 的非 ACSF 患者出现了危及生命的并发症(Clavien-Dindo IV 至 V)。并发症发生率无明显差异。未发现脊柱前入路手术部位感染:PDT对于ACSF术后患者来说是一种可行且安全的手术。结论:对接受 ACSF 治疗的患者来说,PDT 是一种可行且安全的手术,并发症发生率与未接受 ACSF 治疗的患者相当。ACSF 手术部位感染非常罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy following anterior cervical spine fixation - a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

Purpose: In patients with traumatic, infectious, degenerative, and neoplastic surgical indications in the cervical spine, commonly the anterior approach is used. Often these patients require a tracheostomy necessary due to prolonged mechanical ventilation. The limited spinal mobility and proximity to the surgical site of anterior cervical spine fixation (ACSF) could pose an increased risk for complications of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT.) Importantly, PDT might raise wound infection rates of the cervical spine approach. The aim of this study is to prove safety of PDT after ACSF.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study comparing patients with and without ACSF who underwent Ciaglia-single step PDT. After propensity score matching using logistic regression, we compared intra- and postprocedural complication rates. Furthermore, surgical site infections were evaluated. Putensen's definitions of complications and Clavien-Dindo's classification were used.

Results: A total of 1175 patients underwent PDT between 2009 and 2021. Fifty-seven patients underwent PDT following ACSF and were matched to fifty-seven patients without ACSF. The mean interval between ACSF and PDT was 11.3 days. The overall complication rate was 19.3% in the ACSF group and 21.1% in the non-ACSF group. The mean follow-up was 388 days (± 791) in the ACSF group and 424 days (± 819) in the non-ACSF group. Life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo IV to V) were found in 1.8% of ACSF patients and 3.5% of non-ACSF patients. There were no significant differences in complication rates. No surgical site infection of the anterior spine access was detected.

Conclusion: PDT is a feasible and safe procedure in patients after ACSF. Complication rates are comparable to patients without ACSF. Surgical site infections of ACSF are very rare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信