Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni
{"title":"用于检测颅内高压的深度学习方法的衍生、外部和临床验证","authors":"Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension
Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.