膀胱小细胞和大细胞神经内分泌癌的预后提名图、人口统计学和比较分析

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"膀胱小细胞和大细胞神经内分泌癌的预后提名图、人口统计学和比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This retrospective study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the demographics, survival rates, and therapeutic approaches of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) while highlighting key differences compared to common urinary bladder cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), and data was collected from 2000-2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1040 cases of urinary bladder SCNEC and LCNEC were identified. Most patients were over the age of 80 years (33.2%), male (78.9%), and Caucasian (83.6%). Most tumors were over 4.1cm (47.4%) and in the lateral wall of the bladder (37.8%). The overall 5-year survival was 22.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI):20.7-23.5). The 5-year survival by sex was greatest for the female population (28.0%; (95% CI: 24.5-35.0). For treatment modality, the 5-year survival for each was as follows: surgery, 12.5% (95% CI: 10.5-14.5) multimodality therapy (surgery and chemotherapy), 31.1% (95% CI: 28.5-33.7) and combination (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) 32.8% (95% CI: 29.1-36.5). On multivariable analysis, positive nodal status hazar ratio (HR)(HR3.65 [95% CI: 2.34-5.71], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) was identified as a negative predictor for survival, and increasing age was nearly significant for a worse prognosis (<em>P</em> = .052). The prognostic nomogram that was created to predict patient survivability mirrored the findings from the statistical analysis, with a statistically significant difference found in race, treatment modality, and tumor stage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SCNEC and LCNEC are rare yet highly intrusive subtypes of bladder cancer that usually affect Caucasian males over the age of 80 years old. The study identifies older age and positive nodal status as adverse prognostic indicators. Our findings offer crucial insights that can inform future clinical guidelines and serve as a basis for more tailored treatment strategies for these aggressive subtypes of bladder cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Nomogram, Demographics and Comparative Analysis of Urinary Bladder Small Cell and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This retrospective study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the demographics, survival rates, and therapeutic approaches of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) while highlighting key differences compared to common urinary bladder cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), and data was collected from 2000-2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1040 cases of urinary bladder SCNEC and LCNEC were identified. Most patients were over the age of 80 years (33.2%), male (78.9%), and Caucasian (83.6%). Most tumors were over 4.1cm (47.4%) and in the lateral wall of the bladder (37.8%). The overall 5-year survival was 22.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI):20.7-23.5). The 5-year survival by sex was greatest for the female population (28.0%; (95% CI: 24.5-35.0). For treatment modality, the 5-year survival for each was as follows: surgery, 12.5% (95% CI: 10.5-14.5) multimodality therapy (surgery and chemotherapy), 31.1% (95% CI: 28.5-33.7) and combination (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) 32.8% (95% CI: 29.1-36.5). On multivariable analysis, positive nodal status hazar ratio (HR)(HR3.65 [95% CI: 2.34-5.71], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) was identified as a negative predictor for survival, and increasing age was nearly significant for a worse prognosis (<em>P</em> = .052). The prognostic nomogram that was created to predict patient survivability mirrored the findings from the statistical analysis, with a statistically significant difference found in race, treatment modality, and tumor stage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SCNEC and LCNEC are rare yet highly intrusive subtypes of bladder cancer that usually affect Caucasian males over the age of 80 years old. The study identifies older age and positive nodal status as adverse prognostic indicators. Our findings offer crucial insights that can inform future clinical guidelines and serve as a basis for more tailored treatment strategies for these aggressive subtypes of bladder cancer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400154X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155876732400154X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项回顾性研究旨在对小细胞神经内分泌癌(SCNEC)和大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)的人口统计学、生存率和治疗方法进行全面分析,同时强调与普通膀胱癌相比的主要差异。结果共发现 1040 例膀胱小细胞神经内分泌癌和大细胞神经内分泌癌。大多数患者年龄在80岁以上(33.2%),男性(78.9%),白种人(83.6%)。大多数肿瘤超过 4.1 厘米(47.4%),位于膀胱侧壁(37.8%)。总体5年生存率为22.1%(95%置信区间(95% CI):20.7-23.5)。按性别划分,女性的 5 年生存率最高(28.0%;(95% 置信区间:24.5-35.0)。就治疗方式而言,每种治疗方式的 5 年生存率如下:手术,12.5%(95% CI:10.5-14.5);多模式疗法(手术和化疗),31.1%(95% CI:28.5-33.7);综合疗法(手术、化疗和放疗),32.8%(95% CI:29.1-36.5)。在多变量分析中,阳性结节状态哈氏比值(HR)(HR3.65 [95% CI: 2.34-5.71], P <.001)被认为是生存率的负向预测因子,年龄的增加对预后较差几乎有显著影响(P = .052)。为预测患者生存率而创建的预后提名图反映了统计分析的结果,在种族、治疗方式和肿瘤分期方面发现了显著的统计学差异。结论膀胱癌SCNEC和LCNEC是罕见但高度侵袭性的膀胱癌亚型,通常影响80岁以上的白种男性。研究发现,高龄和阳性结节状态是不利的预后指标。我们的研究结果提供了重要的见解,可为未来的临床指南提供参考,并为针对这些侵袭性膀胱癌亚型制定更有针对性的治疗策略奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Nomogram, Demographics and Comparative Analysis of Urinary Bladder Small Cell and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background

This retrospective study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the demographics, survival rates, and therapeutic approaches of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) while highlighting key differences compared to common urinary bladder cancers.

Methods

Our analysis utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), and data was collected from 2000-2020.

Results

A total of 1040 cases of urinary bladder SCNEC and LCNEC were identified. Most patients were over the age of 80 years (33.2%), male (78.9%), and Caucasian (83.6%). Most tumors were over 4.1cm (47.4%) and in the lateral wall of the bladder (37.8%). The overall 5-year survival was 22.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI):20.7-23.5). The 5-year survival by sex was greatest for the female population (28.0%; (95% CI: 24.5-35.0). For treatment modality, the 5-year survival for each was as follows: surgery, 12.5% (95% CI: 10.5-14.5) multimodality therapy (surgery and chemotherapy), 31.1% (95% CI: 28.5-33.7) and combination (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) 32.8% (95% CI: 29.1-36.5). On multivariable analysis, positive nodal status hazar ratio (HR)(HR3.65 [95% CI: 2.34-5.71], P < .001) was identified as a negative predictor for survival, and increasing age was nearly significant for a worse prognosis (P = .052). The prognostic nomogram that was created to predict patient survivability mirrored the findings from the statistical analysis, with a statistically significant difference found in race, treatment modality, and tumor stage.

Conclusions

SCNEC and LCNEC are rare yet highly intrusive subtypes of bladder cancer that usually affect Caucasian males over the age of 80 years old. The study identifies older age and positive nodal status as adverse prognostic indicators. Our findings offer crucial insights that can inform future clinical guidelines and serve as a basis for more tailored treatment strategies for these aggressive subtypes of bladder cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信