"清白":从表现不佳的外科学员角度看改进补救措施的启示

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
{"title":"\"清白\":从表现不佳的外科学员角度看改进补救措施的启示","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remediation frameworks have centered around perspectives of educators. The aim of this study is to explore the insights proposed by surgical trainees to improve remediation processes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. We used reflexive thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Trainees recommended creating environments that safeguarded their well-being. Examples include trainee-led peer support groups and external mentors. Feedback conversations and remediation plans were flagged as needing improvement. Opportunities for forward planning for successful remediation were suggested including learning plans, program evaluation and aligning training program structure with expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings about trainees' insights on improving remediation highlighted the need for further emotional support for trainees. Supervisors need further support with feedback conversations and remediation plans. Actively seeking out trainee perspectives and integrating their recommendations when designing remediation processes should improve outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400494X/pdfft?md5=d9358cd8d207ffa51be312fc9c2e8f26&pid=1-s2.0-S000296102400494X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“A clean slate”: Insights for improving remediation from the perspectives of underperforming surgical trainees\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remediation frameworks have centered around perspectives of educators. The aim of this study is to explore the insights proposed by surgical trainees to improve remediation processes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. We used reflexive thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Trainees recommended creating environments that safeguarded their well-being. Examples include trainee-led peer support groups and external mentors. Feedback conversations and remediation plans were flagged as needing improvement. Opportunities for forward planning for successful remediation were suggested including learning plans, program evaluation and aligning training program structure with expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings about trainees' insights on improving remediation highlighted the need for further emotional support for trainees. Supervisors need further support with feedback conversations and remediation plans. Actively seeking out trainee perspectives and integrating their recommendations when designing remediation processes should improve outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400494X/pdfft?md5=d9358cd8d207ffa51be312fc9c2e8f26&pid=1-s2.0-S000296102400494X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400494X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400494X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景补救框架以教育者的观点为中心。本研究旨在探讨外科学员提出的改进补救过程的见解。方法本定性研究采用半结构式访谈,采访了 11 名作为外科学员经历过正式补救的医生。结果受训者建议创造能保障其健康的环境。这方面的例子包括由学员领导的同伴支持小组和外部导师。反馈对话和补救计划被认为需要改进。学员们提出了为成功补救进行前瞻性规划的机会,包括学习计划、项目评估以及使培训项目结构与预期相一致。督导需要在反馈对话和补救计划方面得到进一步支持。在设计补救过程时,积极征求学员的意见并采纳他们的建议,应能改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“A clean slate”: Insights for improving remediation from the perspectives of underperforming surgical trainees

Background

Remediation frameworks have centered around perspectives of educators. The aim of this study is to explore the insights proposed by surgical trainees to improve remediation processes.

Methods

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. We used reflexive thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.

Results

Trainees recommended creating environments that safeguarded their well-being. Examples include trainee-led peer support groups and external mentors. Feedback conversations and remediation plans were flagged as needing improvement. Opportunities for forward planning for successful remediation were suggested including learning plans, program evaluation and aligning training program structure with expectations.

Conclusions

These findings about trainees' insights on improving remediation highlighted the need for further emotional support for trainees. Supervisors need further support with feedback conversations and remediation plans. Actively seeking out trainee perspectives and integrating their recommendations when designing remediation processes should improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信