用于引导骨再生的安全解剖驱动皮瓣扩展(SAFE):改良皮瓣松解技术的描述和回顾性研究。

Jad Majzoub, Marius Steigmann, Hsun-Liang Chan
{"title":"用于引导骨再生的安全解剖驱动皮瓣扩展(SAFE):改良皮瓣松解技术的描述和回顾性研究。","authors":"Jad Majzoub, Marius Steigmann, Hsun-Liang Chan","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current flap-releasing designs for guided bone regeneration (GBR) emphasize preserving subperiosteal microvasculature by adapting a deep-slit approach, separating the periosteum from the flap. Although biologically sound, a biomechanical disadvantage may be encountered. This study aimed to describe a modified design, the Secured Anatomy-driven Flap Extension (SAFE) technique, for effective facial flap release and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical outcomes of this technique retrospectively. Chart reviews were conducted to identify patients treated by facial flap release in staged GBR procedures between May 2020 and March 2022. The anatomical, biological, and biomechanical rationale of this technique were described. The following clinical data were collected: intraoperative and postoperative complications, initial and final horizontal ridge width before and 5-6 months after the GBR, and implant performance. A total of 10 patients were identified. At baseline, these patients presented with a mean ridge width of 2.05 ± 0.52 mm. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in these patients (bleeding, wound opening, neurosensory disturbance, etc.) at the 2-3-week follow-up visit. At the re-entry, a mean ridge width of 6.50 ± 0.55 mm was measured (P < .01), resulting in a mean of 4.45 ± 0.65 mm ridge width gain. Twenty-one implants were successfully placed, integrated, and in function without signs/symptoms of peri-implantitis after a mean 21.5 ± 9.2 months follow-up period. Preliminary results suggest that the SAFE technique is a safe and predictable approach for releasing facial flaps during GBR procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":"569-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secured Anatomy-Driven Flap Extension (SAFE) for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Modified Flap Release Technique Description and Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jad Majzoub, Marius Steigmann, Hsun-Liang Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current flap-releasing designs for guided bone regeneration (GBR) emphasize preserving subperiosteal microvasculature by adapting a deep-slit approach, separating the periosteum from the flap. Although biologically sound, a biomechanical disadvantage may be encountered. This study aimed to describe a modified design, the Secured Anatomy-driven Flap Extension (SAFE) technique, for effective facial flap release and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical outcomes of this technique retrospectively. Chart reviews were conducted to identify patients treated by facial flap release in staged GBR procedures between May 2020 and March 2022. The anatomical, biological, and biomechanical rationale of this technique were described. The following clinical data were collected: intraoperative and postoperative complications, initial and final horizontal ridge width before and 5-6 months after the GBR, and implant performance. A total of 10 patients were identified. At baseline, these patients presented with a mean ridge width of 2.05 ± 0.52 mm. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in these patients (bleeding, wound opening, neurosensory disturbance, etc.) at the 2-3-week follow-up visit. At the re-entry, a mean ridge width of 6.50 ± 0.55 mm was measured (P < .01), resulting in a mean of 4.45 ± 0.65 mm ridge width gain. Twenty-one implants were successfully placed, integrated, and in function without signs/symptoms of peri-implantitis after a mean 21.5 ± 9.2 months follow-up period. Preliminary results suggest that the SAFE technique is a safe and predictable approach for releasing facial flaps during GBR procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"569-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:目前用于引导骨再生(GBR)的皮瓣松解设计强调通过采用深缝方法保留骨膜下微血管,将骨膜与皮瓣分离。虽然在生物学上是合理的,但可能会遇到生物力学上的不利因素。本研究旨在描述一种有效释放面部皮瓣的改良设计--安全解剖驱动皮瓣延伸(SAFE)技术,并初步评估该技术的临床效果:对 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 3 月间接受分期 GBR 手术中面部皮瓣松解治疗的患者进行病历回顾。对该技术的解剖学、生物学和生物力学原理进行了描述。收集了以下临床数据:术中和术后并发症、GBR术前和术后5-6个月的初始和最终水平嵴宽度以及种植体性能:结果:共确定了 10 名患者。基线时,这些患者的平均牙脊宽度为 2.05 ± 0.52 毫米。这些患者在 2-3 周的随访中未发现术中和术后并发症(出血、伤口裂开、神经感觉障碍等)。复诊时,测量到的平均牙脊宽度为(6.50 ± 0.55)毫米(P < 0.01),平均牙脊宽度增加了(4.45 ± 0.65)毫米。经过平均 21.5 ± 9.2 个月的随访,21 个种植体成功植入、整合并发挥功能,没有出现种植体周围炎的迹象/症状:初步结果表明,SAFE 技术是在 GBR 手术中释放面部皮瓣的一种安全且可预测的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secured Anatomy-Driven Flap Extension (SAFE) for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Modified Flap Release Technique Description and Retrospective Study.

Current flap-releasing designs for guided bone regeneration (GBR) emphasize preserving subperiosteal microvasculature by adapting a deep-slit approach, separating the periosteum from the flap. Although biologically sound, a biomechanical disadvantage may be encountered. This study aimed to describe a modified design, the Secured Anatomy-driven Flap Extension (SAFE) technique, for effective facial flap release and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical outcomes of this technique retrospectively. Chart reviews were conducted to identify patients treated by facial flap release in staged GBR procedures between May 2020 and March 2022. The anatomical, biological, and biomechanical rationale of this technique were described. The following clinical data were collected: intraoperative and postoperative complications, initial and final horizontal ridge width before and 5-6 months after the GBR, and implant performance. A total of 10 patients were identified. At baseline, these patients presented with a mean ridge width of 2.05 ± 0.52 mm. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in these patients (bleeding, wound opening, neurosensory disturbance, etc.) at the 2-3-week follow-up visit. At the re-entry, a mean ridge width of 6.50 ± 0.55 mm was measured (P < .01), resulting in a mean of 4.45 ± 0.65 mm ridge width gain. Twenty-one implants were successfully placed, integrated, and in function without signs/symptoms of peri-implantitis after a mean 21.5 ± 9.2 months follow-up period. Preliminary results suggest that the SAFE technique is a safe and predictable approach for releasing facial flaps during GBR procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信