Ciarán P Friel, Ashley M Goodwin, Patrick L Robles, Mark J Butler, Challace Pahlevan-Ibrekic, Joan Duer-Hefele, Frank Vicari, Samantha Gordon, Thevaa Chandereng, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung, Jerry Suls, Karina W Davidson
{"title":"增加中老年人体育锻炼的个性化(N-of-1)试验可行性测试。","authors":"Ciarán P Friel, Ashley M Goodwin, Patrick L Robles, Mark J Butler, Challace Pahlevan-Ibrekic, Joan Duer-Hefele, Frank Vicari, Samantha Gordon, Thevaa Chandereng, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung, Jerry Suls, Karina W Davidson","doi":"10.1007/s12529-024-10319-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the effectiveness and feasibility of a remotely delivered intervention to increase physical activity (walking) in middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a personalized (N-of-1) trial design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study took place at a major healthcare system from November 2021 to February 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Sixty adults (45-75 years, 92% female, 80% white) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A 10-week study comprising a 2-week baseline, followed by four 2-week periods where four behavior change techniques (BCTs) - self-monitoring, goal setting, action planning, and feedback - were delivered one at a time in random order.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Activity was measured by a Fitbit, and intervention components delivered by email/text. Average daily steps were compared between baseline and intervention. Participants completed satisfaction items derived from the System Usability Scale and reported attitudes and opinions about personalized trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated personalized trial components as feasible and acceptable. Changes in steps between baseline and intervention were not significant, but a large heterogeneity of treatment effects existed, suggesting some participants significantly increased walking while others significantly decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intervention was well-accepted but use of BCTs delivered individually did not result in a significant increase in steps. Feasibility and heterogeneity of treatment effects support adopting a personalized trial approach to optimize intervention results.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Test of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials for Increasing Middle-Aged and Older Adults' Physical Activity.\",\"authors\":\"Ciarán P Friel, Ashley M Goodwin, Patrick L Robles, Mark J Butler, Challace Pahlevan-Ibrekic, Joan Duer-Hefele, Frank Vicari, Samantha Gordon, Thevaa Chandereng, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung, Jerry Suls, Karina W Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12529-024-10319-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the effectiveness and feasibility of a remotely delivered intervention to increase physical activity (walking) in middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a personalized (N-of-1) trial design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study took place at a major healthcare system from November 2021 to February 2022.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Sixty adults (45-75 years, 92% female, 80% white) were recruited.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A 10-week study comprising a 2-week baseline, followed by four 2-week periods where four behavior change techniques (BCTs) - self-monitoring, goal setting, action planning, and feedback - were delivered one at a time in random order.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Activity was measured by a Fitbit, and intervention components delivered by email/text. Average daily steps were compared between baseline and intervention. Participants completed satisfaction items derived from the System Usability Scale and reported attitudes and opinions about personalized trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated personalized trial components as feasible and acceptable. Changes in steps between baseline and intervention were not significant, but a large heterogeneity of treatment effects existed, suggesting some participants significantly increased walking while others significantly decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intervention was well-accepted but use of BCTs delivered individually did not result in a significant increase in steps. Feasibility and heterogeneity of treatment effects support adopting a personalized trial approach to optimize intervention results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10319-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10319-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility Test of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials for Increasing Middle-Aged and Older Adults' Physical Activity.
Purpose: To test the effectiveness and feasibility of a remotely delivered intervention to increase physical activity (walking) in middle-aged and older adults.
Design: This study used a personalized (N-of-1) trial design.
Setting: This study took place at a major healthcare system from November 2021 to February 2022.
Subjects: Sixty adults (45-75 years, 92% female, 80% white) were recruited.
Intervention: A 10-week study comprising a 2-week baseline, followed by four 2-week periods where four behavior change techniques (BCTs) - self-monitoring, goal setting, action planning, and feedback - were delivered one at a time in random order.
Measures: Activity was measured by a Fitbit, and intervention components delivered by email/text. Average daily steps were compared between baseline and intervention. Participants completed satisfaction items derived from the System Usability Scale and reported attitudes and opinions about personalized trials.
Results: Participants rated personalized trial components as feasible and acceptable. Changes in steps between baseline and intervention were not significant, but a large heterogeneity of treatment effects existed, suggesting some participants significantly increased walking while others significantly decreased.
Conclusions: Our intervention was well-accepted but use of BCTs delivered individually did not result in a significant increase in steps. Feasibility and heterogeneity of treatment effects support adopting a personalized trial approach to optimize intervention results.