经修改的曼彻斯特分诊系统对老年病人的疗效:回顾性定量研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70024
Baiyu Li, Zhufeng Zhang, Keye Li, Yayin Deng
{"title":"经修改的曼彻斯特分诊系统对老年病人的疗效:回顾性定量研究。","authors":"Baiyu Li, Zhufeng Zhang, Keye Li, Yayin Deng","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Geriatric patients are increasingly dominating the daily routine in emergency department (ED). The atypical clinical presentation of disease, multimorbidity, frailty and cognitive impairment of geriatric patients pose particular challenges for triage in the ED. Efficient and accurate emergency triage plays a key role in differentiating between geriatric patients who need timely treatment and those who can wait safely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the modified Manchester Triage System (mMTS) in classifying geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 18,796 geriatric patients (≥65 years) attending the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Zhejiang province between 1 June 2020 and 30 June 2022. Baseline information on patients was collected and divided into two different study groups according to triage level: high priority (red/orange) and low priority (yellow/green). The sensitivity and specificity of the mMTS were estimated by verifying the triage classification received by the emergency geriatric patients and their survival at 7 days or the need for acute surgery within 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 17,764 geriatric patients with a median age of 72 years in ED. 10.7% (1896/17,764) of the geriatric patients were assigned to the high priority code group (red/orange) and 89.3% (15,868/17,764) were in the low priority code group (yellow/green). The sensitivity of the mMTS associated with death within 7 days was 85.7% (77.5-91.4), specificity was 89.8% (89.3-90.2), and accuracy was 89.8% (89.3-90.2). 1.8% of patients required surgery within 72 h. The sensitivity was 62.6% (57.0-67.9), specificity was 90.3% (89.8-90.7), and negative predictive value was 99.2% (99.0-99.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mMTS has good specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value for geriatric patients. However, its incorrect prediction of triage in high-priority code patients results in lower sensitivity, which may serve as a protective strategy for these individuals. The current emergency triage system does not completely screen geriatric patients with severe acute illness who present to the ED, and it is necessary to add comprehensive assessment tools that match the characteristics of geriatric patients to improve triage outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of a modified Manchester Triage System for geriatric patients: A retrospective quantitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Baiyu Li, Zhufeng Zhang, Keye Li, Yayin Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Geriatric patients are increasingly dominating the daily routine in emergency department (ED). The atypical clinical presentation of disease, multimorbidity, frailty and cognitive impairment of geriatric patients pose particular challenges for triage in the ED. Efficient and accurate emergency triage plays a key role in differentiating between geriatric patients who need timely treatment and those who can wait safely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the modified Manchester Triage System (mMTS) in classifying geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 18,796 geriatric patients (≥65 years) attending the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Zhejiang province between 1 June 2020 and 30 June 2022. Baseline information on patients was collected and divided into two different study groups according to triage level: high priority (red/orange) and low priority (yellow/green). The sensitivity and specificity of the mMTS were estimated by verifying the triage classification received by the emergency geriatric patients and their survival at 7 days or the need for acute surgery within 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 17,764 geriatric patients with a median age of 72 years in ED. 10.7% (1896/17,764) of the geriatric patients were assigned to the high priority code group (red/orange) and 89.3% (15,868/17,764) were in the low priority code group (yellow/green). The sensitivity of the mMTS associated with death within 7 days was 85.7% (77.5-91.4), specificity was 89.8% (89.3-90.2), and accuracy was 89.8% (89.3-90.2). 1.8% of patients required surgery within 72 h. The sensitivity was 62.6% (57.0-67.9), specificity was 90.3% (89.8-90.7), and negative predictive value was 99.2% (99.0-99.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mMTS has good specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value for geriatric patients. However, its incorrect prediction of triage in high-priority code patients results in lower sensitivity, which may serve as a protective strategy for these individuals. The current emergency triage system does not completely screen geriatric patients with severe acute illness who present to the ED, and it is necessary to add comprehensive assessment tools that match the characteristics of geriatric patients to improve triage outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在急诊科(ED)的日常工作中,老年病人越来越多。老年病人的非典型临床表现、多病共患、体弱多病和认知障碍等特点给急诊科的分诊工作带来了特殊挑战。高效准确的急诊分诊在区分需要及时治疗的老年病人和可以安全等待的病人方面起着关键作用。本研究旨在评估改良曼彻斯特分诊系统(mMTS)在对老年病人进行分诊时的表现:观察性回顾研究:对2020年6月1日至2022年6月30日期间在浙江省一家三级医院急诊科就诊的18796名老年病患者(≥65岁)进行回顾性研究。研究人员收集了患者的基线信息,并根据分诊级别将其分为两个不同的研究组:高优先级(红色/橙色)和低优先级(黄色/绿色)。通过核实急诊老年病患者所接受的分流等级及其 7 天内的存活率或 72 小时内的急性手术需求,对 mMTS 的灵敏度和特异性进行了估算:研究共纳入了 17764 名急诊老年病患者,中位年龄为 72 岁。10.7%的老年病患者(1896/17764)被分配到高优先级代码组(红色/橙色),89.3%的老年病患者(15868/17764)被分配到低优先级代码组(黄色/绿色)。与 7 天内死亡相关的 mMTS 敏感性为 85.7%(77.5-91.4),特异性为 89.8%(89.3-90.2),准确性为 89.8%(89.3-90.2)。敏感性为 62.6%(57.0-67.9),特异性为 90.3%(89.8-90.7),阴性预测值为 99.2%(99.0-99.4):mMTS 对老年病人具有良好的特异性、准确性和阴性预测值。然而,该系统对高优先级代码患者的分流预测不准确,导致灵敏度较低,这可能是对这些患者的一种保护策略。目前的急诊分诊系统并不能完全筛查急诊室就诊的患有严重急性病的老年病患者,因此有必要增加符合老年病患者特征的综合评估工具,以改善分诊结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of a modified Manchester Triage System for geriatric patients: A retrospective quantitative study.

Aim: Geriatric patients are increasingly dominating the daily routine in emergency department (ED). The atypical clinical presentation of disease, multimorbidity, frailty and cognitive impairment of geriatric patients pose particular challenges for triage in the ED. Efficient and accurate emergency triage plays a key role in differentiating between geriatric patients who need timely treatment and those who can wait safely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the modified Manchester Triage System (mMTS) in classifying geriatric patients.

Design: An observational retrospective study.

Methods: A retrospective study of 18,796 geriatric patients (≥65 years) attending the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Zhejiang province between 1 June 2020 and 30 June 2022. Baseline information on patients was collected and divided into two different study groups according to triage level: high priority (red/orange) and low priority (yellow/green). The sensitivity and specificity of the mMTS were estimated by verifying the triage classification received by the emergency geriatric patients and their survival at 7 days or the need for acute surgery within 72 h.

Results: The study included a total of 17,764 geriatric patients with a median age of 72 years in ED. 10.7% (1896/17,764) of the geriatric patients were assigned to the high priority code group (red/orange) and 89.3% (15,868/17,764) were in the low priority code group (yellow/green). The sensitivity of the mMTS associated with death within 7 days was 85.7% (77.5-91.4), specificity was 89.8% (89.3-90.2), and accuracy was 89.8% (89.3-90.2). 1.8% of patients required surgery within 72 h. The sensitivity was 62.6% (57.0-67.9), specificity was 90.3% (89.8-90.7), and negative predictive value was 99.2% (99.0-99.4).

Conclusions: The mMTS has good specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value for geriatric patients. However, its incorrect prediction of triage in high-priority code patients results in lower sensitivity, which may serve as a protective strategy for these individuals. The current emergency triage system does not completely screen geriatric patients with severe acute illness who present to the ED, and it is necessary to add comprehensive assessment tools that match the characteristics of geriatric patients to improve triage outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信