衔接临床信息学和实施科学,改善非住院肿瘤治疗中的癌症症状管理:IMPACT 联合会的经验。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae081
Nadine Jackson McCleary, James L Merle, Joshua E Richardson, Michael Bass, Sofia F Garcia, Andrea L Cheville, Sandra A Mitchell, Roxanne Jensen, Sarah Minteer, Jessica D Austin, Nathan Tesch, Lisa DiMartino, Michael J Hassett, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Sandra Wong, Deborah Schrag, David Cella, Ashley Wilder Smith, Justin D Smith
{"title":"衔接临床信息学和实施科学,改善非住院肿瘤治疗中的癌症症状管理:IMPACT 联合会的经验。","authors":"Nadine Jackson McCleary, James L Merle, Joshua E Richardson, Michael Bass, Sofia F Garcia, Andrea L Cheville, Sandra A Mitchell, Roxanne Jensen, Sarah Minteer, Jessica D Austin, Nathan Tesch, Lisa DiMartino, Michael J Hassett, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Sandra Wong, Deborah Schrag, David Cella, Ashley Wilder Smith, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report lessons from integrating the methods and perspectives of clinical informatics (CI) and implementation science (IS) in the context of Improving the Management of symPtoms during and following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium pragmatic trials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>IMPACT informaticists, trialists, and implementation scientists met to identify challenges and solutions by examining robust case examples from 3 Research Centers that are deploying systematic symptom assessment and management interventions via electronic health records (EHRs). Investigators discussed data collection and CI challenges, implementation strategies, and lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CI implementation strategies and EHRs systems were utilized to collect and act upon symptoms and impairments in functioning via electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) captured in ambulatory oncology settings. Limited EHR functionality and data collection capabilities constrained the ability to address IS questions. Collecting ePRO data required significant planning and organizational champions adept at navigating ambiguity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Bringing together CI and IS perspectives offers critical opportunities for monitoring and managing cancer symptoms via ePROs. Discussions between CI and IS researchers identified and addressed gaps between applied informatics implementation and theory-based IS trial and evaluation methods. The use of common terminology may foster shared mental models between CI and IS communities to enhance EHR design to more effectively facilitate ePRO implementation and clinical responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of ePROs in ambulatory oncology clinics benefits from common understanding of the concepts, lexicon, and incentives between CI implementers and IS researchers to facilitate and measure the results of implementation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"7 3","pages":"ooae081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging clinical informatics and implementation science to improve cancer symptom management in ambulatory oncology practices: experiences from the IMPACT consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Jackson McCleary, James L Merle, Joshua E Richardson, Michael Bass, Sofia F Garcia, Andrea L Cheville, Sandra A Mitchell, Roxanne Jensen, Sarah Minteer, Jessica D Austin, Nathan Tesch, Lisa DiMartino, Michael J Hassett, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Sandra Wong, Deborah Schrag, David Cella, Ashley Wilder Smith, Justin D Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report lessons from integrating the methods and perspectives of clinical informatics (CI) and implementation science (IS) in the context of Improving the Management of symPtoms during and following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium pragmatic trials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>IMPACT informaticists, trialists, and implementation scientists met to identify challenges and solutions by examining robust case examples from 3 Research Centers that are deploying systematic symptom assessment and management interventions via electronic health records (EHRs). Investigators discussed data collection and CI challenges, implementation strategies, and lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CI implementation strategies and EHRs systems were utilized to collect and act upon symptoms and impairments in functioning via electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) captured in ambulatory oncology settings. Limited EHR functionality and data collection capabilities constrained the ability to address IS questions. Collecting ePRO data required significant planning and organizational champions adept at navigating ambiguity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Bringing together CI and IS perspectives offers critical opportunities for monitoring and managing cancer symptoms via ePROs. Discussions between CI and IS researchers identified and addressed gaps between applied informatics implementation and theory-based IS trial and evaluation methods. The use of common terminology may foster shared mental models between CI and IS communities to enhance EHR design to more effectively facilitate ePRO implementation and clinical responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of ePROs in ambulatory oncology clinics benefits from common understanding of the concepts, lexicon, and incentives between CI implementers and IS researchers to facilitate and measure the results of implementation efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"ooae081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告在 "改善癌症治疗过程中和治疗后症状管理(IMPACT)联盟 "务实试验中整合临床信息学(CI)和实施科学(IS)的方法和观点所取得的经验:IMPACT 的信息学家、试验专家和实施科学家聚集在一起,通过研究 3 个研究中心通过电子健康记录 (EHR) 部署系统症状评估和管理干预措施的有力案例,找出挑战和解决方案。研究人员讨论了数据收集和 CI 挑战、实施策略和经验教训:结果:研究人员利用 CI 实施策略和电子病历系统,通过非住院肿瘤环境中采集的电子患者报告结果 (ePRO) 收集症状和功能障碍,并采取相应行动。有限的电子病历功能和数据收集能力限制了解决信息系统问题的能力。收集 ePRO 数据需要大量的计划和善于驾驭模糊性的组织领导者:将 CI 和 IS 的观点结合起来,为通过 ePRO 监测和管理癌症症状提供了重要机会。CI和IS研究人员之间的讨论发现并解决了应用信息学实施与基于理论的IS试验和评估方法之间的差距。共同术语的使用可促进 CI 和 IS 社区之间建立共同的心理模型,从而加强电子健康记录系统的设计,更有效地促进 ePRO 的实施和临床反应:结论:在门诊肿瘤诊所实施 ePRO 可受益于 CI 实施者和 IS 研究人员对概念、术语和激励措施的共同理解,从而促进和衡量实施工作的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging clinical informatics and implementation science to improve cancer symptom management in ambulatory oncology practices: experiences from the IMPACT consortium.

Objectives: To report lessons from integrating the methods and perspectives of clinical informatics (CI) and implementation science (IS) in the context of Improving the Management of symPtoms during and following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium pragmatic trials.

Materials and methods: IMPACT informaticists, trialists, and implementation scientists met to identify challenges and solutions by examining robust case examples from 3 Research Centers that are deploying systematic symptom assessment and management interventions via electronic health records (EHRs). Investigators discussed data collection and CI challenges, implementation strategies, and lessons learned.

Results: CI implementation strategies and EHRs systems were utilized to collect and act upon symptoms and impairments in functioning via electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) captured in ambulatory oncology settings. Limited EHR functionality and data collection capabilities constrained the ability to address IS questions. Collecting ePRO data required significant planning and organizational champions adept at navigating ambiguity.

Discussion: Bringing together CI and IS perspectives offers critical opportunities for monitoring and managing cancer symptoms via ePROs. Discussions between CI and IS researchers identified and addressed gaps between applied informatics implementation and theory-based IS trial and evaluation methods. The use of common terminology may foster shared mental models between CI and IS communities to enhance EHR design to more effectively facilitate ePRO implementation and clinical responses.

Conclusion: Implementation of ePROs in ambulatory oncology clinics benefits from common understanding of the concepts, lexicon, and incentives between CI implementers and IS researchers to facilitate and measure the results of implementation efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信