球囊肺血管成形术治疗不符合肺动脉内膜切除术条件的近端慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.12432
Justin Issard, Elie Fadel, Samuel Dolidon, Benoit Gerardin, Dominique Fabre, Delphine Mitilian, Olaf Mercier, Mitja Jevnikar, Xavier Jais, Marc Humbert, Philippe Brenot
{"title":"球囊肺血管成形术治疗不符合肺动脉内膜切除术条件的近端慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压。","authors":"Justin Issard, Elie Fadel, Samuel Dolidon, Benoit Gerardin, Dominique Fabre, Delphine Mitilian, Olaf Mercier, Mitja Jevnikar, Xavier Jais, Marc Humbert, Philippe Brenot","doi":"10.1002/pul2.12432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) to treat chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is generally reserved for distal obstruction precluding pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) but can be used in patients with proximal disease who are at high surgical risk or refuse surgery. This single-center retrospective study compared BPA efficacy in patients with proximal versus distal CTEPH. Of the 478 patients, 36 had proximal disease, follow-up was 11.6 months and mean number of BPA 6. After BPA, PVR, and mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased significantly in the proximal and distal groups (from 6.5 to 4.0 WU and 39 to 31 mmHg and from 7.6 to 3.8 WU and 44 to 31 mmHg, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for all comparisons). NYHA class also improved significantly in both groups, from 3 to 2, whereas the 6-min walk distance, cardiac output, and serum NT pro-BNP showed significant improvements only in the distal group. Thus, when PEA for CTEPH is technically feasible but not performed due to severe comorbidities or patient refusal, BPA can produce significant hemodynamic improvements, albeit less marked than in patients with distal disease. Better patient selection to BPA might improve outcomes in patients with proximal disease who are ineligible for PEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for proximal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Issard, Elie Fadel, Samuel Dolidon, Benoit Gerardin, Dominique Fabre, Delphine Mitilian, Olaf Mercier, Mitja Jevnikar, Xavier Jais, Marc Humbert, Philippe Brenot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.12432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) to treat chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is generally reserved for distal obstruction precluding pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) but can be used in patients with proximal disease who are at high surgical risk or refuse surgery. This single-center retrospective study compared BPA efficacy in patients with proximal versus distal CTEPH. Of the 478 patients, 36 had proximal disease, follow-up was 11.6 months and mean number of BPA 6. After BPA, PVR, and mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased significantly in the proximal and distal groups (from 6.5 to 4.0 WU and 39 to 31 mmHg and from 7.6 to 3.8 WU and 44 to 31 mmHg, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for all comparisons). NYHA class also improved significantly in both groups, from 3 to 2, whereas the 6-min walk distance, cardiac output, and serum NT pro-BNP showed significant improvements only in the distal group. Thus, when PEA for CTEPH is technically feasible but not performed due to severe comorbidities or patient refusal, BPA can produce significant hemodynamic improvements, albeit less marked than in patients with distal disease. Better patient selection to BPA might improve outcomes in patients with proximal disease who are ineligible for PEA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12432\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)的球囊肺血管成形术(BPA)通常用于排除肺动脉内膜切除术(PEA)的远端阻塞,但也可用于手术风险高或拒绝手术的近端疾病患者。这项单中心回顾性研究比较了 BPA 对近端 CTEPH 患者和远端 CTEPH 患者的疗效。在 478 名患者中,36 人患有近端疾病,随访时间为 11.6 个月,平均 BPA 次数为 6 次。 BPA 后,近端组和远端组的 PVR 和平均肺动脉压显著下降(分别从 6.5 WU 降至 4.0 WU 和 39 mmHg,以及从 7.6 WU 降至 3.8 WU 和 44 mmHg,p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for proximal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) to treat chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is generally reserved for distal obstruction precluding pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) but can be used in patients with proximal disease who are at high surgical risk or refuse surgery. This single-center retrospective study compared BPA efficacy in patients with proximal versus distal CTEPH. Of the 478 patients, 36 had proximal disease, follow-up was 11.6 months and mean number of BPA 6. After BPA, PVR, and mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased significantly in the proximal and distal groups (from 6.5 to 4.0 WU and 39 to 31 mmHg and from 7.6 to 3.8 WU and 44 to 31 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). NYHA class also improved significantly in both groups, from 3 to 2, whereas the 6-min walk distance, cardiac output, and serum NT pro-BNP showed significant improvements only in the distal group. Thus, when PEA for CTEPH is technically feasible but not performed due to severe comorbidities or patient refusal, BPA can produce significant hemodynamic improvements, albeit less marked than in patients with distal disease. Better patient selection to BPA might improve outcomes in patients with proximal disease who are ineligible for PEA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信