Elizabeth E Stanley, Elizabeth Pfoh, Laura Lipold, Kathryn Martinez
{"title":"初级保健中男性和女性患者在性功能障碍管理方面的差距:观察研究。","authors":"Elizabeth E Stanley, Elizabeth Pfoh, Laura Lipold, Kathryn Martinez","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09004-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female sexual dysfunction (FSD), defined as clinically distressing problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affects 12% of US women. Despite availability of medications for FSD, primary care physicians (PCPs) report feeling underprepared to manage it. In contrast, erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently treated in primary care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe differences in patterns of FSD and ED diagnosis and management in primary care patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Primary care patients with an incident diagnosis of FSD or ED seen at a large, integrated health system between 2016 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Sexual dysfunction management (referral or prescription of a guideline-concordant medication within 3 days of diagnosis), patient characteristics (age, race, insurance type, marital status), and specialty of physician who diagnosed sexual dysfunction. We estimated the odds of FSD and ED management using mixed effects logistic regression in separate models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The sample included 6540 female patients newly diagnosed with FSD and 16,591 male patients newly diagnosed with ED. Twenty-two percent of FSD diagnoses were made by PCPs, and 38% by OB/GYNs. Forty percent of ED diagnoses were made by PCPs and 20% by urologists. Patients with FSD were managed less frequently (33%) than ED patients (41%). The majority of FSD and ED patients who were managed received a medication (96% and 97%, respectively). In the multivariable models, compared to diagnosis by a specialist, diagnosis by a PCP was associated with lower odds of management for FSD patients (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and higher odds of management (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.64) for ED patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care patients with FSD are less likely to receive management if they are diagnosed by a PCP than by an OB/GYN. The opposite was true of ED patients, exposing a gap in the quality of care female patients receive.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"847-853"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gap in Sexual Dysfunction Management Between Male and Female Patients Seen in Primary Care: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth E Stanley, Elizabeth Pfoh, Laura Lipold, Kathryn Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09004-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Female sexual dysfunction (FSD), defined as clinically distressing problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affects 12% of US women. Despite availability of medications for FSD, primary care physicians (PCPs) report feeling underprepared to manage it. In contrast, erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently treated in primary care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe differences in patterns of FSD and ED diagnosis and management in primary care patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Primary care patients with an incident diagnosis of FSD or ED seen at a large, integrated health system between 2016 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Sexual dysfunction management (referral or prescription of a guideline-concordant medication within 3 days of diagnosis), patient characteristics (age, race, insurance type, marital status), and specialty of physician who diagnosed sexual dysfunction. We estimated the odds of FSD and ED management using mixed effects logistic regression in separate models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The sample included 6540 female patients newly diagnosed with FSD and 16,591 male patients newly diagnosed with ED. Twenty-two percent of FSD diagnoses were made by PCPs, and 38% by OB/GYNs. Forty percent of ED diagnoses were made by PCPs and 20% by urologists. Patients with FSD were managed less frequently (33%) than ED patients (41%). The majority of FSD and ED patients who were managed received a medication (96% and 97%, respectively). In the multivariable models, compared to diagnosis by a specialist, diagnosis by a PCP was associated with lower odds of management for FSD patients (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and higher odds of management (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.64) for ED patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care patients with FSD are less likely to receive management if they are diagnosed by a PCP than by an OB/GYN. The opposite was true of ED patients, exposing a gap in the quality of care female patients receive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"847-853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09004-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09004-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:女性性功能障碍 (FSD) 是指在临床上令人苦恼的欲望、唤起、性高潮或疼痛问题,影响着 12% 的美国女性。尽管有治疗 FSD 的药物,但初级保健医生(PCPs)表示在处理 FSD 方面准备不足。与此相反,勃起功能障碍(ED)却经常在初级保健中得到治疗:目的:描述初级保健患者的 FSD 和 ED 诊断和管理模式的差异:设计:回顾性观察研究:主要测量指标:主要测量指标:性功能障碍管理(诊断后 3 天内转诊或开具符合指南的药物)、患者特征(年龄、种族、保险类型、婚姻状况)以及诊断性功能障碍的医生的专业。我们在不同的模型中使用混合效应逻辑回归估算了FSD和ED治疗的几率:样本包括 6540 名新诊断为 FSD 的女性患者和 16591 名新诊断为 ED 的男性患者。22%的FSD诊断由初级保健医生做出,38%由妇产科医生做出。40% 的 ED 诊断由初级保健医生做出,20% 由泌尿科医生做出。FSD 患者接受治疗的比例(33%)低于 ED 患者(41%)。大多数接受治疗的 FSD 和 ED 患者都接受了药物治疗(分别为 96% 和 97%)。在多变量模型中,与专科医生的诊断相比,初级保健医生的诊断与 FSD 患者接受治疗的几率较低(aOR,0.59;95% CI,0.51-0.69)和 ED 患者接受治疗的几率较高(aOR,1.52;95% CI,1.36-1.64)有关:结论:与妇产科医生相比,初级保健医生诊断的 FSD 患者接受治疗的几率较低。而急诊室患者的情况恰恰相反,这暴露了女性患者在接受医疗质量方面的差距。
Gap in Sexual Dysfunction Management Between Male and Female Patients Seen in Primary Care: An Observational Study.
Background: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD), defined as clinically distressing problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affects 12% of US women. Despite availability of medications for FSD, primary care physicians (PCPs) report feeling underprepared to manage it. In contrast, erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently treated in primary care.
Objective: To describe differences in patterns of FSD and ED diagnosis and management in primary care patients.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Subjects: Primary care patients with an incident diagnosis of FSD or ED seen at a large, integrated health system between 2016 and 2022.
Main measures: Sexual dysfunction management (referral or prescription of a guideline-concordant medication within 3 days of diagnosis), patient characteristics (age, race, insurance type, marital status), and specialty of physician who diagnosed sexual dysfunction. We estimated the odds of FSD and ED management using mixed effects logistic regression in separate models.
Key results: The sample included 6540 female patients newly diagnosed with FSD and 16,591 male patients newly diagnosed with ED. Twenty-two percent of FSD diagnoses were made by PCPs, and 38% by OB/GYNs. Forty percent of ED diagnoses were made by PCPs and 20% by urologists. Patients with FSD were managed less frequently (33%) than ED patients (41%). The majority of FSD and ED patients who were managed received a medication (96% and 97%, respectively). In the multivariable models, compared to diagnosis by a specialist, diagnosis by a PCP was associated with lower odds of management for FSD patients (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) and higher odds of management (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.64) for ED patients.
Conclusions: Primary care patients with FSD are less likely to receive management if they are diagnosed by a PCP than by an OB/GYN. The opposite was true of ED patients, exposing a gap in the quality of care female patients receive.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.