Gary L Peck, Samantha R Johnson, Sarah W Matthews, Burkhard Jansen, Loren E Clarke, Rachel A Reifer, Maral Kibarian Skelsey
{"title":"基因组分析有助于皮肤镜下非典型色素病变的治疗。","authors":"Gary L Peck, Samantha R Johnson, Sarah W Matthews, Burkhard Jansen, Loren E Clarke, Rachel A Reifer, Maral Kibarian Skelsey","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous melanoma-specific dermoscopic features have been described in invasive melanomas, while fewer features are found in melanoma in situ (MIS) and atypical nevi (ATN). Consensus regarding which features are critical for the differentiation of MIS from ATN has not been reached.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine 1) whether there are dermoscopic features that differentiate early MIS from ATN, and 2) whether non-invasive assessment of genomic biomarkers (LINC00518 and PRAME) can aid in patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2018 to 2023, 56 melanomas were evaluated for 5 clinical and 13 dermoscopic features and melanoma-associated genomic biomarkers. Two groups of ATN with positive and negative genomic biomarkers were randomly selected for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All melanomas in this study expressed one or both melanoma-associated genomic markers. MIS had an average of 3.90 (range, 2-7) of the 13 dermoscopic features, while invasive melanomas had an average of 4.44 (range, 3-6). Sixteen of 40 (40%) MIS and 3 of 16 (18.8%) invasive melanomas had 3 or fewer dermoscopic features. These findings were comparable to those observed in both ATN groups. The most common dermoscopic features were absent or diminished pigment network, regression structures, and granularity. This combination of features was most helpful in identifying lesions for genomic testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical and dermoscopic features alone could not differentiate MIS from ATN. Non-invasive genomic testing helped differentiate lower from higher-risk lesions and aid in clinical management decisions. Genomic testing was particularly helpful in patients with large numbers of lesions with several being considered for biopsy based on clinical and dermoscopic examination. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):717-723. doi:10.36849/JDD.8454.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Analysis Aids in the Management of Dermoscopically Atypical Pigmented Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Gary L Peck, Samantha R Johnson, Sarah W Matthews, Burkhard Jansen, Loren E Clarke, Rachel A Reifer, Maral Kibarian Skelsey\",\"doi\":\"10.36849/JDD.8454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous melanoma-specific dermoscopic features have been described in invasive melanomas, while fewer features are found in melanoma in situ (MIS) and atypical nevi (ATN). Consensus regarding which features are critical for the differentiation of MIS from ATN has not been reached.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine 1) whether there are dermoscopic features that differentiate early MIS from ATN, and 2) whether non-invasive assessment of genomic biomarkers (LINC00518 and PRAME) can aid in patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2018 to 2023, 56 melanomas were evaluated for 5 clinical and 13 dermoscopic features and melanoma-associated genomic biomarkers. Two groups of ATN with positive and negative genomic biomarkers were randomly selected for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All melanomas in this study expressed one or both melanoma-associated genomic markers. MIS had an average of 3.90 (range, 2-7) of the 13 dermoscopic features, while invasive melanomas had an average of 4.44 (range, 3-6). Sixteen of 40 (40%) MIS and 3 of 16 (18.8%) invasive melanomas had 3 or fewer dermoscopic features. These findings were comparable to those observed in both ATN groups. The most common dermoscopic features were absent or diminished pigment network, regression structures, and granularity. This combination of features was most helpful in identifying lesions for genomic testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical and dermoscopic features alone could not differentiate MIS from ATN. Non-invasive genomic testing helped differentiate lower from higher-risk lesions and aid in clinical management decisions. Genomic testing was particularly helpful in patients with large numbers of lesions with several being considered for biopsy based on clinical and dermoscopic examination. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):717-723. doi:10.36849/JDD.8454.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic Analysis Aids in the Management of Dermoscopically Atypical Pigmented Lesions.
Background: Numerous melanoma-specific dermoscopic features have been described in invasive melanomas, while fewer features are found in melanoma in situ (MIS) and atypical nevi (ATN). Consensus regarding which features are critical for the differentiation of MIS from ATN has not been reached.
Purpose: Determine 1) whether there are dermoscopic features that differentiate early MIS from ATN, and 2) whether non-invasive assessment of genomic biomarkers (LINC00518 and PRAME) can aid in patient management.
Methods: From 2018 to 2023, 56 melanomas were evaluated for 5 clinical and 13 dermoscopic features and melanoma-associated genomic biomarkers. Two groups of ATN with positive and negative genomic biomarkers were randomly selected for comparison.
Results: All melanomas in this study expressed one or both melanoma-associated genomic markers. MIS had an average of 3.90 (range, 2-7) of the 13 dermoscopic features, while invasive melanomas had an average of 4.44 (range, 3-6). Sixteen of 40 (40%) MIS and 3 of 16 (18.8%) invasive melanomas had 3 or fewer dermoscopic features. These findings were comparable to those observed in both ATN groups. The most common dermoscopic features were absent or diminished pigment network, regression structures, and granularity. This combination of features was most helpful in identifying lesions for genomic testing.
Conclusions: Clinical and dermoscopic features alone could not differentiate MIS from ATN. Non-invasive genomic testing helped differentiate lower from higher-risk lesions and aid in clinical management decisions. Genomic testing was particularly helpful in patients with large numbers of lesions with several being considered for biopsy based on clinical and dermoscopic examination. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):717-723. doi:10.36849/JDD.8454.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology.
We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality.
Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.