N Agarwal, J Brugarolas, P Ghatalia, S George, J B Haanen, H Gurney, R Ravilla, A Van der Veldt, B Beuselinck, I Pokataev, B B M Suelmann, M H Tuthill, D Vaena, F Zagouri, J Wu, R F Perini, Y Liu, J Merchan, M B Atkins
{"title":"贝珠替凡治疗晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的随机 2 期剂量比较 LITESPARK-013 研究。","authors":"N Agarwal, J Brugarolas, P Ghatalia, S George, J B Haanen, H Gurney, R Ravilla, A Van der Veldt, B Beuselinck, I Pokataev, B B M Suelmann, M H Tuthill, D Vaena, F Zagouri, J Wu, R F Perini, Y Liu, J Merchan, M B Atkins","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Belzutifan is a first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor approved at a dose of 120 mg once daily for certain adults with VHL disease and adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following therapy with a programmed death receptor (or ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, whether belzutifan dose could be optimized is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The phase 2 LITESPARK-013 study (NCT04489771) enrolled patients with advanced clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after 1-3 prior systemic therapies, including an anti-PD-(L)1 regimen. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg or 200 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 154 patients were enrolled (120 mg: n = 76; 200 mg: n = 78). Median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 14.8-28.4). ORR was 23.7% vs 23.1% for the 120 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.5312; -0.5% [95% CI, -14.0 to 12.9]. Median DOR was not reached for the 120 mg arm and was 16.1 months (2.1+ to 23.5+) for the 200 mg arm. No between-group differences were observed for PFS (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.63-1.40]) or OS (medians not reached; HR 1.11 [95% CI, 0.65-1.90]). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 35 patients (46.1%) in the 120 mg group and 36 patients (46.2%) in the 200 mg group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of belzutifan was similar between the 120-mg dose and the 200-mg dose for previously treated clear cell RCC. Safety at both doses was consistent with the known safety profile of belzutifan. These results further support 120 mg once daily as the preferred dose for belzutifan.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized phase 2 dose comparison LITESPARK-013 study of belzutifan in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"N Agarwal, J Brugarolas, P Ghatalia, S George, J B Haanen, H Gurney, R Ravilla, A Van der Veldt, B Beuselinck, I Pokataev, B B M Suelmann, M H Tuthill, D Vaena, F Zagouri, J Wu, R F Perini, Y Liu, J Merchan, M B Atkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Belzutifan is a first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor approved at a dose of 120 mg once daily for certain adults with VHL disease and adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following therapy with a programmed death receptor (or ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, whether belzutifan dose could be optimized is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The phase 2 LITESPARK-013 study (NCT04489771) enrolled patients with advanced clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after 1-3 prior systemic therapies, including an anti-PD-(L)1 regimen. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg or 200 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 154 patients were enrolled (120 mg: n = 76; 200 mg: n = 78). Median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 14.8-28.4). ORR was 23.7% vs 23.1% for the 120 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.5312; -0.5% [95% CI, -14.0 to 12.9]. Median DOR was not reached for the 120 mg arm and was 16.1 months (2.1+ to 23.5+) for the 200 mg arm. No between-group differences were observed for PFS (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.63-1.40]) or OS (medians not reached; HR 1.11 [95% CI, 0.65-1.90]). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 35 patients (46.1%) in the 120 mg group and 36 patients (46.2%) in the 200 mg group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of belzutifan was similar between the 120-mg dose and the 200-mg dose for previously treated clear cell RCC. Safety at both doses was consistent with the known safety profile of belzutifan. These results further support 120 mg once daily as the preferred dose for belzutifan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":56.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2338\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized phase 2 dose comparison LITESPARK-013 study of belzutifan in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Background: Belzutifan is a first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor approved at a dose of 120 mg once daily for certain adults with VHL disease and adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following therapy with a programmed death receptor (or ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, whether belzutifan dose could be optimized is unclear.
Patients and methods: The phase 2 LITESPARK-013 study (NCT04489771) enrolled patients with advanced clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after 1-3 prior systemic therapies, including an anti-PD-(L)1 regimen. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg or 200 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Results: Overall, 154 patients were enrolled (120 mg: n = 76; 200 mg: n = 78). Median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 14.8-28.4). ORR was 23.7% vs 23.1% for the 120 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.5312; -0.5% [95% CI, -14.0 to 12.9]. Median DOR was not reached for the 120 mg arm and was 16.1 months (2.1+ to 23.5+) for the 200 mg arm. No between-group differences were observed for PFS (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.63-1.40]) or OS (medians not reached; HR 1.11 [95% CI, 0.65-1.90]). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 35 patients (46.1%) in the 120 mg group and 36 patients (46.2%) in the 200 mg group.
Conclusion: The efficacy of belzutifan was similar between the 120-mg dose and the 200-mg dose for previously treated clear cell RCC. Safety at both doses was consistent with the known safety profile of belzutifan. These results further support 120 mg once daily as the preferred dose for belzutifan.
期刊介绍：
Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine.
The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings.
Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
