{"title":"单细胞 RNA 测序揭示了非小细胞肺癌微环境浸润对免疫疗法的不同反应。","authors":"Xinnan Hu, Yonghui Wu, Lixin Wang, Fujun Yang, Lingyun Ye, Xiaoxia Chen, Xiao Song, Ping Wei","doi":"10.1002/jgm.3736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Immunotherapy represents a groundbreaking and monumental achievement in the field of cancer therapy, marking a significant advancement in fighting against this devastating disease. Lung cancer has showed consistent clinical improvements in response to immunotherapy treatments, yet, it is undeniable that challenges such as limited response rates acquire resistance, and the unclear fundamental mechanisms were inevitable problems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The cellular composition was defined and distinguished through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of MPR (major pathologic response) and NMPR (non-major pathologic response) samples in GSE207422, including four primary MPR samples and eight primary NMPR samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found obvious difference in CD8+ T cell population between MPR and NMPR samples, with high expression of TYMS, RRM2, and BIRC5 in NPMR samples. Meanwhile, the proportion of macrophages and tumor epithelial cells infiltration increased in the NMPR samples. We discovered biomarkers (ACTN4, ATF3, BRD2, CDKN1A, and CHMP4B) in epithelial cells which were potentially represented worse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>By exploring the difference of tumor microenvironment (TME) in samples with different corresponding degrees of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, this research introduces a number of novel biomarkers for predicting the response of treatment and a theoretical basis for overcoming immunotherapy resistance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gene Medicine","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals microenvironmental infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer with different responses to immunotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Xinnan Hu, Yonghui Wu, Lixin Wang, Fujun Yang, Lingyun Ye, Xiaoxia Chen, Xiao Song, Ping Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgm.3736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Immunotherapy represents a groundbreaking and monumental achievement in the field of cancer therapy, marking a significant advancement in fighting against this devastating disease. Lung cancer has showed consistent clinical improvements in response to immunotherapy treatments, yet, it is undeniable that challenges such as limited response rates acquire resistance, and the unclear fundamental mechanisms were inevitable problems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The cellular composition was defined and distinguished through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of MPR (major pathologic response) and NMPR (non-major pathologic response) samples in GSE207422, including four primary MPR samples and eight primary NMPR samples.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found obvious difference in CD8+ T cell population between MPR and NMPR samples, with high expression of TYMS, RRM2, and BIRC5 in NPMR samples. Meanwhile, the proportion of macrophages and tumor epithelial cells infiltration increased in the NMPR samples. We discovered biomarkers (ACTN4, ATF3, BRD2, CDKN1A, and CHMP4B) in epithelial cells which were potentially represented worse outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>By exploring the difference of tumor microenvironment (TME) in samples with different corresponding degrees of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, this research introduces a number of novel biomarkers for predicting the response of treatment and a theoretical basis for overcoming immunotherapy resistance.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gene Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gene Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgm.3736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gene Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgm.3736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals microenvironmental infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer with different responses to immunotherapy
Background
Immunotherapy represents a groundbreaking and monumental achievement in the field of cancer therapy, marking a significant advancement in fighting against this devastating disease. Lung cancer has showed consistent clinical improvements in response to immunotherapy treatments, yet, it is undeniable that challenges such as limited response rates acquire resistance, and the unclear fundamental mechanisms were inevitable problems.
Methods
The cellular composition was defined and distinguished through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of MPR (major pathologic response) and NMPR (non-major pathologic response) samples in GSE207422, including four primary MPR samples and eight primary NMPR samples.
Results
We found obvious difference in CD8+ T cell population between MPR and NMPR samples, with high expression of TYMS, RRM2, and BIRC5 in NPMR samples. Meanwhile, the proportion of macrophages and tumor epithelial cells infiltration increased in the NMPR samples. We discovered biomarkers (ACTN4, ATF3, BRD2, CDKN1A, and CHMP4B) in epithelial cells which were potentially represented worse outcomes.
Conclusions
By exploring the difference of tumor microenvironment (TME) in samples with different corresponding degrees of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, this research introduces a number of novel biomarkers for predicting the response of treatment and a theoretical basis for overcoming immunotherapy resistance.
期刊介绍:
The aims and scope of The Journal of Gene Medicine include cutting-edge science of gene transfer and its applications in gene and cell therapy, genome editing with precision nucleases, epigenetic modifications of host genome by small molecules, siRNA, microRNA and other noncoding RNAs as therapeutic gene-modulating agents or targets, biomarkers for precision medicine, and gene-based prognostic/diagnostic studies.
Key areas of interest are the design of novel synthetic and viral vectors, novel therapeutic nucleic acids such as mRNA, modified microRNAs and siRNAs, antagomirs, aptamers, antisense and exon-skipping agents, refined genome editing tools using nucleic acid /protein combinations, physically or biologically targeted delivery and gene modulation, ex vivo or in vivo pharmacological studies including animal models, and human clinical trials.
Papers presenting research into the mechanisms underlying transfer and action of gene medicines, the application of the new technologies for stem cell modification or nucleic acid based vaccines, the identification of new genetic or epigenetic variations as biomarkers to direct precision medicine, and the preclinical/clinical development of gene/expression signatures indicative of diagnosis or predictive of prognosis are also encouraged.