人人都有希望?研究社会抑制对综合团体治疗项目中希望与结果之间关系的调节作用。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Michal Mielimaka, David Kealy, Ingrid Sochting, John S Ogrodniczuk
{"title":"人人都有希望?研究社会抑制对综合团体治疗项目中希望与结果之间关系的调节作用。","authors":"Michal Mielimaka, David Kealy, Ingrid Sochting, John S Ogrodniczuk","doi":"10.1521/bumc.2024.88.3.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing research supports the therapeutic value of hope in different therapies and for diverse patient groups. Patients who are socially inhibited tend to have a particularly difficult time in group therapy, and the experience of hope in that context may be especially poignant for them. The present study investigated the impact of hope on the outcome of a group-based treatment and whether this impact differed for patients depending on their level of social inhibition. The sample consisted of 49 consecutively admitted patients who completed treatment in an intensive, integrative group therapy program. Patients completed four self-report measures to assess hope, social inhibition, quality of life, and depression. Regression with moderation analysis was employed. The analyses revealed that social inhibition significantly moderated the impact of hope on treatment outcome, indicating that hope had a more pronounced effect among those patients with relatively higher levels of social inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":51683,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hope for all? Investigating the moderating effect of social inhibition on the association between hope and outcome in an integrative group therapy program.\",\"authors\":\"Michal Mielimaka, David Kealy, Ingrid Sochting, John S Ogrodniczuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/bumc.2024.88.3.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Existing research supports the therapeutic value of hope in different therapies and for diverse patient groups. Patients who are socially inhibited tend to have a particularly difficult time in group therapy, and the experience of hope in that context may be especially poignant for them. The present study investigated the impact of hope on the outcome of a group-based treatment and whether this impact differed for patients depending on their level of social inhibition. The sample consisted of 49 consecutively admitted patients who completed treatment in an intensive, integrative group therapy program. Patients completed four self-report measures to assess hope, social inhibition, quality of life, and depression. Regression with moderation analysis was employed. The analyses revealed that social inhibition significantly moderated the impact of hope on treatment outcome, indicating that hope had a more pronounced effect among those patients with relatively higher levels of social inhibition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2024.88.3.197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2024.88.3.197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的研究支持希望在不同疗法和不同病人群体中的治疗价值。社交抑制的患者在团体治疗中往往会遇到特别多的困难,在这种情况下,希望的体验对他们来说可能尤其重要。本研究调查了希望对小组治疗结果的影响,以及这种影响是否会因患者的社交抑制程度而有所不同。样本由 49 名连续入院的患者组成,他们在一个强化综合小组治疗项目中完成了治疗。患者完成了四项自我报告测量,以评估希望、社交抑制、生活质量和抑郁。研究采用了带调节的回归分析。分析结果显示,社交抑制对希望对治疗结果的影响有明显的调节作用,表明希望对社交抑制水平相对较高的患者有更明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hope for all? Investigating the moderating effect of social inhibition on the association between hope and outcome in an integrative group therapy program.

Existing research supports the therapeutic value of hope in different therapies and for diverse patient groups. Patients who are socially inhibited tend to have a particularly difficult time in group therapy, and the experience of hope in that context may be especially poignant for them. The present study investigated the impact of hope on the outcome of a group-based treatment and whether this impact differed for patients depending on their level of social inhibition. The sample consisted of 49 consecutively admitted patients who completed treatment in an intensive, integrative group therapy program. Patients completed four self-report measures to assess hope, social inhibition, quality of life, and depression. Regression with moderation analysis was employed. The analyses revealed that social inhibition significantly moderated the impact of hope on treatment outcome, indicating that hope had a more pronounced effect among those patients with relatively higher levels of social inhibition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic offers a psychodynamic perspective on the application of theory and research in outpatient psychotherapy, attachment theory, developments in cognitive neuroscience and psychopathologies, as well as the integration of different modes of therapy. This widely indexed, peer-reviewed journal has been published since 1936 by the Menninger Clinic. Topical issues focus on critical subjects such as disordered attachments, panic disorder, trauma, and evidence-based interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信