下颌骨后牙冠高度空间不同的夹板种植体和非夹板种植体周围应力分布的比较:有限元分析研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan, Mert Keleş, Burak Yılmaz
{"title":"下颌骨后牙冠高度空间不同的夹板种植体和非夹板种植体周围应力分布的比较:有限元分析研究。","authors":"Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan, Mert Keleş, Burak Yılmaz","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the stress distribution on prosthetic components of splinted and nonsplinted prostheses, bone, and implants with different crown height space (CHS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Mandibular posterior segment was modeled with no resorption at the second premolar site and various amounts of resorption (0, 3, 6, and 9 mm) at the first molar site. Two adjacent implants (Straumann bone level implants, 4.1 mm×8 mm) were placed; at the second premolar site, the crown height was 8 mm and at the first molar site, the crown height varied (8, 11, 14, and 17 mm), depending on the amount of resorption. Both splinted and nonsplinted crowns were designed. Vertical and oblique loads of 400 N were applied to the crowns. von Mises stress was used to evaluate the stress distribution in the implant complex and maximum principal stress was used to evaluate the stress in the bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When oblique forces were applied, the highest von Mises stresses were observed for nonsplinted crowns in the 17 mm CHS group. The maximum principal and minimum principal stresses observed in bone under oblique loading increased with increased CHS for nonsplinted restorations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Crown height affected the amount of stress in bone and implant components. When the crown height difference between two adjacent implants increases, splinting may be crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of stress distribution around splinted and nonsplinted implants with different crown height space in posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan, Mert Keleş, Burak Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the stress distribution on prosthetic components of splinted and nonsplinted prostheses, bone, and implants with different crown height space (CHS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Mandibular posterior segment was modeled with no resorption at the second premolar site and various amounts of resorption (0, 3, 6, and 9 mm) at the first molar site. Two adjacent implants (Straumann bone level implants, 4.1 mm×8 mm) were placed; at the second premolar site, the crown height was 8 mm and at the first molar site, the crown height varied (8, 11, 14, and 17 mm), depending on the amount of resorption. Both splinted and nonsplinted crowns were designed. Vertical and oblique loads of 400 N were applied to the crowns. von Mises stress was used to evaluate the stress distribution in the implant complex and maximum principal stress was used to evaluate the stress in the bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When oblique forces were applied, the highest von Mises stresses were observed for nonsplinted crowns in the 17 mm CHS group. The maximum principal and minimum principal stresses observed in bone under oblique loading increased with increased CHS for nonsplinted restorations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Crown height affected the amount of stress in bone and implant components. When the crown height difference between two adjacent implants increases, splinting may be crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本有限元分析(FEA)研究的目的是分析不同牙冠高度间隙(CHS)的夹板和非夹板修复体、骨和种植体的应力分布:下颌后段建模,第二前磨牙部位无吸收,第一磨牙部位有不同程度的吸收(0、3、6 和 9 毫米)。放置了两个相邻的种植体(Straumann 骨水平种植体,4.1 毫米×8 毫米);在第二前磨牙部位,牙冠高度为 8 毫米,在第一磨牙部位,根据吸收量的不同,牙冠高度也不同(8、11、14 和 17 毫米)。设计了夹板牙冠和非夹板牙冠。采用 von Mises 应力评估种植体复合体的应力分布,采用最大主应力评估牙槽骨的应力:结果:在施加斜向力时,17 mm CHS 组的非染色牙冠的 von Mises 应力最大。在斜向加载下观察到的牙槽骨中的最大主应力和最小主应力随着非染色修复体 CHS 的增加而增加:结论:牙冠高度会影响牙槽骨和种植体部件的应力大小。当两个相邻种植体之间的冠高度差增大时,夹板可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of stress distribution around splinted and nonsplinted implants with different crown height space in posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study.

Purpose: The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the stress distribution on prosthetic components of splinted and nonsplinted prostheses, bone, and implants with different crown height space (CHS).

Materials and methods: Mandibular posterior segment was modeled with no resorption at the second premolar site and various amounts of resorption (0, 3, 6, and 9 mm) at the first molar site. Two adjacent implants (Straumann bone level implants, 4.1 mm×8 mm) were placed; at the second premolar site, the crown height was 8 mm and at the first molar site, the crown height varied (8, 11, 14, and 17 mm), depending on the amount of resorption. Both splinted and nonsplinted crowns were designed. Vertical and oblique loads of 400 N were applied to the crowns. von Mises stress was used to evaluate the stress distribution in the implant complex and maximum principal stress was used to evaluate the stress in the bone.

Results: When oblique forces were applied, the highest von Mises stresses were observed for nonsplinted crowns in the 17 mm CHS group. The maximum principal and minimum principal stresses observed in bone under oblique loading increased with increased CHS for nonsplinted restorations.

Conclusions: Crown height affected the amount of stress in bone and implant components. When the crown height difference between two adjacent implants increases, splinting may be crucial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信