左肺静脉干长度是心房颤动导管消融术长期成功的可靠预测指标

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2508301
Jiaju Li, Zhe Wang, Fen Qin, Fangyuan Luo, Jiawei Chen, Yankun Liu, Hailong Tao, Jianzeng Dong
{"title":"左肺静脉干长度是心房颤动导管消融术长期成功的可靠预测指标","authors":"Jiaju Li, Zhe Wang, Fen Qin, Fangyuan Luo, Jiawei Chen, Yankun Liu, Hailong Tao, Jianzeng Dong","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2508301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a commonly used treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the long-term recurrence rate remains relatively high. Given the inconsistent results regarding the role of left pulmonary vein (PV) ostial anatomy in post-ablative recurrence of RFCA in previous studies, we sought to investigate the role of left PV trunk length using an alternative methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 369 AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were included. The left/right trunk length (LTL/RTL) of the PV was measured from pre-ablative computed tomography (CT) using three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. We constructed three multivariable Cox models, with the inclusion of the LTL, RTL, and no LTL/RTL, and used the Delong test, integrated discrimination index (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI) to assess model improvement. We identified optimal cut-off values for LTL with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and estimated outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. We also used subgroup analysis to evaluate interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the Delong test, IDI, and NRI indicated that LTL had a favorable impact on the performance of the multivariate model. Subsequently, the multivariate Cox regression analysis identified LTL as a significant risk factor for post-ablative recurrence of AF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value for LTL is 11.15 mm, and the Kaplan-Meier estimator revealed different outcomes (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). We calculated <i>p</i> for interaction between LTL and other factors, and no significant interaction terms were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTL is a robust prognostic indicator for post-ablative outcome in AF patients receiving RFCA, with a longer LTL indicating a higher risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Pulmonary Vein Trunk Length as a Robust Predictor of Long-Term Success of Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaju Li, Zhe Wang, Fen Qin, Fangyuan Luo, Jiawei Chen, Yankun Liu, Hailong Tao, Jianzeng Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2508301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a commonly used treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the long-term recurrence rate remains relatively high. Given the inconsistent results regarding the role of left pulmonary vein (PV) ostial anatomy in post-ablative recurrence of RFCA in previous studies, we sought to investigate the role of left PV trunk length using an alternative methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 369 AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were included. The left/right trunk length (LTL/RTL) of the PV was measured from pre-ablative computed tomography (CT) using three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. We constructed three multivariable Cox models, with the inclusion of the LTL, RTL, and no LTL/RTL, and used the Delong test, integrated discrimination index (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI) to assess model improvement. We identified optimal cut-off values for LTL with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and estimated outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. We also used subgroup analysis to evaluate interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the Delong test, IDI, and NRI indicated that LTL had a favorable impact on the performance of the multivariate model. Subsequently, the multivariate Cox regression analysis identified LTL as a significant risk factor for post-ablative recurrence of AF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value for LTL is 11.15 mm, and the Kaplan-Meier estimator revealed different outcomes (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). We calculated <i>p</i> for interaction between LTL and other factors, and no significant interaction terms were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTL is a robust prognostic indicator for post-ablative outcome in AF patients receiving RFCA, with a longer LTL indicating a higher risk of recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2508301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2508301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:射频导管消融术(RFCA)是心房颤动(房颤)的常用治疗方法,但长期复发率仍相对较高。鉴于以往研究中有关左肺静脉(PV)骨架解剖在 RFCA 消融后复发中作用的结果不一致,我们试图采用另一种方法来研究左肺静脉主干长度的作用:方法:共纳入 369 名接受导管消融术的房颤患者。方法:共纳入 369 名接受导管消融术的房颤患者,使用三维重建技术通过消融前的计算机断层扫描(CT)测量左/右外周静脉主干长度(LTL/RTL)。我们构建了三个多变量 Cox 模型,包括 LTL、RTL 和无 LTL/RTL,并使用德隆检验、综合判别指数 (IDI) 和净重分类指数 (NRI) 评估模型的改进情况。我们利用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)确定了 LTL 的最佳临界值,并利用卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线估算了结果。我们还使用亚组分析来评估交互作用:德隆检验、IDI 和 NRI 的结果表明,LTL 对多变量模型的性能有有利影响。随后,多变量 Cox 回归分析确定 LTL 是房颤消融术后复发的重要风险因素(调整后危险比 (HR) = 1.08,95% CI:1.05-1.12,P 0.001)。根据 ROC 曲线,LTL 的最佳临界值为 11.15 mm,Kaplan-Meier 估计器显示了不同的结果(P 0.001)。我们计算了LTL与其他因素的交互作用P,没有观察到显著的交互作用项:LTL是心房颤动患者接受RFCA术后预后的可靠指标,LTL越长,复发风险越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left Pulmonary Vein Trunk Length as a Robust Predictor of Long-Term Success of Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation.

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a commonly used treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the long-term recurrence rate remains relatively high. Given the inconsistent results regarding the role of left pulmonary vein (PV) ostial anatomy in post-ablative recurrence of RFCA in previous studies, we sought to investigate the role of left PV trunk length using an alternative methodology.

Methods: A total of 369 AF patients undergoing catheter ablation were included. The left/right trunk length (LTL/RTL) of the PV was measured from pre-ablative computed tomography (CT) using three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. We constructed three multivariable Cox models, with the inclusion of the LTL, RTL, and no LTL/RTL, and used the Delong test, integrated discrimination index (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI) to assess model improvement. We identified optimal cut-off values for LTL with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and estimated outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. We also used subgroup analysis to evaluate interactions.

Results: The results of the Delong test, IDI, and NRI indicated that LTL had a favorable impact on the performance of the multivariate model. Subsequently, the multivariate Cox regression analysis identified LTL as a significant risk factor for post-ablative recurrence of AF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p < 0.001). According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value for LTL is 11.15 mm, and the Kaplan-Meier estimator revealed different outcomes (p < 0.001). We calculated p for interaction between LTL and other factors, and no significant interaction terms were observed.

Conclusions: LTL is a robust prognostic indicator for post-ablative outcome in AF patients receiving RFCA, with a longer LTL indicating a higher risk of recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信