重建失败:评估初次乳房再造失败后的手术和患者报告结果。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Minji Kim, Nima Khavanin, Charles Z Jiang, Joshua M Barnett, Lillian A Boe, Robert J Allen, Carrie S Stern, Babak J Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson
{"title":"重建失败:评估初次乳房再造失败后的手术和患者报告结果。","authors":"Minji Kim, Nima Khavanin, Charles Z Jiang, Joshua M Barnett, Lillian A Boe, Robert J Allen, Carrie S Stern, Babak J Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction failure, defined as the removal of a prosthetic device or flap without immediate replacement, can be traumatic for patients. We aim to describe the progression of patients who experience tissue expander (TE), implant, or autologous breast reconstructive failure and assess the patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who undergo additional reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients undergoing TE, implant, or autologous breast reconstruction between 2017 and 2022 were included, and patients with reconstructive failures were identified. Outcomes of interests included (1) receipt of additional reconstruction and (2) BREAST-Q scores 1-year after reconstructive failure. We also performed a propensity-matched analysis between patients who undergo secondary reconstruction and patients who had an uncomplicated reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,258 TE, 4,420 implant, and 1,545 autologous breast reconstruction patients were included. Of patients who experienced reconstructive failures, 49.5% of TE, 4.8% of implant, and 53.8% of autologous patients underwent secondary reconstruction. Age, psychiatric diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, and mastectomy type were associated with increased likelihood of secondary reconstruction. Between patients with and without additional reconstruction, higher Psychosocial Well-being trended towards the former cohort (61 [Interquartile Range: 56, 80] vs 50 [46, 65], p=0.085). Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable PROs at 1-year after definite reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less than half of reconstructive failure patients undergo an additional reconstruction. Patients with secondary reconstruction may have improved Psychosocial Well-being than those who do not and comparable PROs to those who had uncomplicated initial reconstruction. Surgeons should counsel patients with reconstructive failures that although traumatizing, secondary reconstruction may be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstructing Failure: Assessing Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Loss of Initial Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Minji Kim, Nima Khavanin, Charles Z Jiang, Joshua M Barnett, Lillian A Boe, Robert J Allen, Carrie S Stern, Babak J Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction failure, defined as the removal of a prosthetic device or flap without immediate replacement, can be traumatic for patients. We aim to describe the progression of patients who experience tissue expander (TE), implant, or autologous breast reconstructive failure and assess the patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who undergo additional reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients undergoing TE, implant, or autologous breast reconstruction between 2017 and 2022 were included, and patients with reconstructive failures were identified. Outcomes of interests included (1) receipt of additional reconstruction and (2) BREAST-Q scores 1-year after reconstructive failure. We also performed a propensity-matched analysis between patients who undergo secondary reconstruction and patients who had an uncomplicated reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,258 TE, 4,420 implant, and 1,545 autologous breast reconstruction patients were included. Of patients who experienced reconstructive failures, 49.5% of TE, 4.8% of implant, and 53.8% of autologous patients underwent secondary reconstruction. Age, psychiatric diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, and mastectomy type were associated with increased likelihood of secondary reconstruction. Between patients with and without additional reconstruction, higher Psychosocial Well-being trended towards the former cohort (61 [Interquartile Range: 56, 80] vs 50 [46, 65], p=0.085). Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable PROs at 1-year after definite reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less than half of reconstructive failure patients undergo an additional reconstruction. Patients with secondary reconstruction may have improved Psychosocial Well-being than those who do not and comparable PROs to those who had uncomplicated initial reconstruction. Surgeons should counsel patients with reconstructive failures that although traumatizing, secondary reconstruction may be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011717\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房再造失败是指假体装置或皮瓣被移除而未立即更换,这可能会给患者造成创伤。我们旨在描述经历组织扩张器(TE)、植入物或自体乳房重建失败的患者的进展情况,并评估接受额外重建的患者的患者报告结果(PROs):纳入2017年至2022年期间接受组织扩张器(TE)、植入物或自体乳房重建的患者,并确定重建失败的患者。相关结果包括:(1)接受额外重建;(2)重建失败 1 年后的 BREAST-Q 评分。我们还对接受二次重建的患者和未进行复杂重建的患者进行了倾向匹配分析:结果:共纳入了 4258 名 TE、4420 名假体和 1545 名自体乳房重建患者。在重建失败的患者中,49.5%的TE患者、4.8%的植入患者和53.8%的自体患者进行了二次重建。年龄、精神诊断、化疗、放疗和乳房切除术类型与二次重建的可能性增加有关。在接受和未接受二次重建的患者中,前者的社会心理健康水平更高(61 [四分位间范围:56, 80] vs 50 [46, 65],P=0.085)。倾向匹配分析表明,明确重建后 1 年的 PROs 具有可比性:结论:不到一半的重建失败患者会进行二次重建。结论:只有不到一半的重建失败患者进行了二次重建,与未进行二次重建的患者相比,二次重建患者的社会心理健康水平可能会有所提高,其PROs也与未进行复杂的初次重建的患者相当。外科医生应告知重建失败的患者,二次重建虽然会造成创伤,但可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstructing Failure: Assessing Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Loss of Initial Breast Reconstruction.

Background: Breast reconstruction failure, defined as the removal of a prosthetic device or flap without immediate replacement, can be traumatic for patients. We aim to describe the progression of patients who experience tissue expander (TE), implant, or autologous breast reconstructive failure and assess the patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who undergo additional reconstruction.

Method: Patients undergoing TE, implant, or autologous breast reconstruction between 2017 and 2022 were included, and patients with reconstructive failures were identified. Outcomes of interests included (1) receipt of additional reconstruction and (2) BREAST-Q scores 1-year after reconstructive failure. We also performed a propensity-matched analysis between patients who undergo secondary reconstruction and patients who had an uncomplicated reconstruction.

Results: 4,258 TE, 4,420 implant, and 1,545 autologous breast reconstruction patients were included. Of patients who experienced reconstructive failures, 49.5% of TE, 4.8% of implant, and 53.8% of autologous patients underwent secondary reconstruction. Age, psychiatric diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, and mastectomy type were associated with increased likelihood of secondary reconstruction. Between patients with and without additional reconstruction, higher Psychosocial Well-being trended towards the former cohort (61 [Interquartile Range: 56, 80] vs 50 [46, 65], p=0.085). Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable PROs at 1-year after definite reconstruction.

Conclusion: Less than half of reconstructive failure patients undergo an additional reconstruction. Patients with secondary reconstruction may have improved Psychosocial Well-being than those who do not and comparable PROs to those who had uncomplicated initial reconstruction. Surgeons should counsel patients with reconstructive failures that although traumatizing, secondary reconstruction may be beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信