阿司匹林与低分子量肝素对膝关节和髋关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞预防的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Loay A Salman, Seif B Altahtamouni, Harman Khatkar, Abdallah Al-Ani, Shamsi Hameed, Abtin Alvand
{"title":"阿司匹林与低分子量肝素对膝关节和髋关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞预防的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Loay A Salman, Seif B Altahtamouni, Harman Khatkar, Abdallah Al-Ani, Shamsi Hameed, Abtin Alvand","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception till June 2024 for original trials investigating the outcomes of aspirin versus LMWH in hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes included minor and major bleeding events, and postoperative mortality within 90 days. This review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 12,134 participants were included. The mean ages for the aspirin and LMWH cohorts were 66.6 (57.6-69.0) years and 66.8 (57.9-68.9) years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of VTE between the aspirin and the LMWH cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.89; p: 0.877). A subanalysis based on the specific VTE entity (pulmonary embolism [PE] or deep venous thrombosis) showed a significantly higher PE risk for patients receiving aspirin than the LMWH cohort (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11-2.89; p: 0.017). There was no difference in minor (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.04; p: 0.072) and major bleeding (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.40-1.47; p: 0.424) episodes across both groups. Furthermore, subanalysis among the total knee arthroplasty group showed that the aspirin cohort was significantly more likely to suffer VTEs than their LMWH counterparts (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.21-1.98; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE among patients receiving aspirin compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Aspirin was associated with a significantly higher overall VTE risk among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, in particular. This might suggest the inferiority of aspirin compared to LMWH in preventing VTE following such procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Loay A Salman, Seif B Altahtamouni, Harman Khatkar, Abdallah Al-Ani, Shamsi Hameed, Abtin Alvand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception till June 2024 for original trials investigating the outcomes of aspirin versus LMWH in hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes included minor and major bleeding events, and postoperative mortality within 90 days. This review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 12,134 participants were included. The mean ages for the aspirin and LMWH cohorts were 66.6 (57.6-69.0) years and 66.8 (57.9-68.9) years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of VTE between the aspirin and the LMWH cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.89; p: 0.877). A subanalysis based on the specific VTE entity (pulmonary embolism [PE] or deep venous thrombosis) showed a significantly higher PE risk for patients receiving aspirin than the LMWH cohort (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11-2.89; p: 0.017). There was no difference in minor (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.04; p: 0.072) and major bleeding (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.40-1.47; p: 0.424) episodes across both groups. Furthermore, subanalysis among the total knee arthroplasty group showed that the aspirin cohort was significantly more likely to suffer VTEs than their LMWH counterparts (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.21-1.98; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE among patients receiving aspirin compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Aspirin was associated with a significantly higher overall VTE risk among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, in particular. This might suggest the inferiority of aspirin compared to LMWH in preventing VTE following such procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12456\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估阿司匹林与低分子量肝素(LMWH)在预防髋关节和膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)方面的疗效:方法:在 PubMedline/Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 数据库中搜索了从开始到 2024 年 6 月有关髋关节和膝关节置换术后阿司匹林与 LMWH 效果对比的原始试验。主要结果为 VTE。次要结果包括轻微和严重出血事件以及术后 90 天内的死亡率。本综述根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南进行:结果:共纳入了 7 项随机对照试验,共有 12,134 人参与。阿司匹林组和 LMWH 组的平均年龄分别为 66.6(57.6-69.0)岁和 66.8(57.9-68.9)岁。阿司匹林队列和 LMWH 队列的 VTE 总风险差异无统计学意义(几率比 [OR]:0.95;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.48-1.89;P:0.877)。基于特定 VTE 实体(肺栓塞 [PE] 或深静脉血栓)的子分析显示,接受阿司匹林治疗的患者 PE 风险显著高于 LMWH 组群(OR:1.79;95% CI:1.11-2.89;P:0.017)。两组患者的轻微出血(OR:0.64;95% CI:0.40-1.04;P:0.072)和大出血(OR:0.77;95% CI:0.40-1.47;P:0.424)发生率没有差异。此外,对全膝关节置换术组进行的子分析表明,阿司匹林组发生 VTE 的几率明显高于 LMWH 组(OR:1.55;95% CI:1.21-1.98;P 结论:该研究表明,阿司匹林组发生 VTE 的风险明显高于 LMWH 组:本研究显示,因骨关节炎接受髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者发生 PE 的风险明显高于 LMWH。特别是在接受膝关节置换术的患者中,阿司匹林与明显较高的整体 VTE 风险相关。这可能表明,与LMWH相比,阿司匹林在预防此类手术后的VTE方面效果较差:证据等级:一级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception till June 2024 for original trials investigating the outcomes of aspirin versus LMWH in hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes included minor and major bleeding events, and postoperative mortality within 90 days. This review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials with 12,134 participants were included. The mean ages for the aspirin and LMWH cohorts were 66.6 (57.6-69.0) years and 66.8 (57.9-68.9) years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of VTE between the aspirin and the LMWH cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.89; p: 0.877). A subanalysis based on the specific VTE entity (pulmonary embolism [PE] or deep venous thrombosis) showed a significantly higher PE risk for patients receiving aspirin than the LMWH cohort (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11-2.89; p: 0.017). There was no difference in minor (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.04; p: 0.072) and major bleeding (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.40-1.47; p: 0.424) episodes across both groups. Furthermore, subanalysis among the total knee arthroplasty group showed that the aspirin cohort was significantly more likely to suffer VTEs than their LMWH counterparts (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.21-1.98; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of PE among patients receiving aspirin compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Aspirin was associated with a significantly higher overall VTE risk among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, in particular. This might suggest the inferiority of aspirin compared to LMWH in preventing VTE following such procedures.

Level of evidence: Level I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信