与肌钙蛋白 T 和晚期钆增强相比,灰质纤维化与急性心肌梗死患者的存活率和射血分数的相关性。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s00392-024-02536-w
Ramona Schmitt, Clara Staats, Klaus Kaier, Christoph Ahlgrim, Manuel Hein, Johannes Brado, Philipp Steinhoff, Hannah Billig, Martin Soschynski, Tobias Krauss, Christopher L Schlett, Dirk Westermann, Franz-Josef Neumann, Philipp Ruile, Philipp Breitbart
{"title":"与肌钙蛋白 T 和晚期钆增强相比,灰质纤维化与急性心肌梗死患者的存活率和射血分数的相关性。","authors":"Ramona Schmitt, Clara Staats, Klaus Kaier, Christoph Ahlgrim, Manuel Hein, Johannes Brado, Philipp Steinhoff, Hannah Billig, Martin Soschynski, Tobias Krauss, Christopher L Schlett, Dirk Westermann, Franz-Josef Neumann, Philipp Ruile, Philipp Breitbart","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02536-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify greyzone fibrosis (GZF) in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to evaluate its correlation with MI-free survival and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with the established risk factors high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study involved 176 patients who experienced acute MI and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to hospital discharge, followed by a second CMR on average six months later. LGE was quantified in both examinations, a separate analysis of the GZF was conducted only in the follow-up CMR after resolution of the initial infarct edema. LVEF was measured in both CMR. hs-cTnT levels were assessed at hospital admission, as well as 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h after coronary intervention. Telephone follow-ups were conducted annually for up to 8 years. LGE measurements showed better correlation with MI-free survival (Harrell's C of 0.711 of LGE mass) compared to GZF (0.579 of GZF mass). Additionally, hs-cTnT outperformed GZF (Harrell's C of 0.645). As an univariable predictor for MI-free survival, only hs-cTnT reached significance (p < 0.05). With regard to improvements in ejection fraction, both hs-cTnT and LGE measurements showed acceptable correlation with improvement in ejection fraction (p < 0.05), while GZF measurements showed no correlation (p > 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CMR, the assessment of GZF demonstrated inferior p correlation compared to hs-cTnT and LGE in patients after acute MI with respect to the endpoint of MI-free survival. Furthermore, GZF showed no correlation with the improvement of LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"749-759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of greyzone fibrosis compared to troponin T and late gadolinium enhancement with survival and ejection fraction in patients after acute myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Ramona Schmitt, Clara Staats, Klaus Kaier, Christoph Ahlgrim, Manuel Hein, Johannes Brado, Philipp Steinhoff, Hannah Billig, Martin Soschynski, Tobias Krauss, Christopher L Schlett, Dirk Westermann, Franz-Josef Neumann, Philipp Ruile, Philipp Breitbart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02536-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify greyzone fibrosis (GZF) in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to evaluate its correlation with MI-free survival and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with the established risk factors high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study involved 176 patients who experienced acute MI and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to hospital discharge, followed by a second CMR on average six months later. LGE was quantified in both examinations, a separate analysis of the GZF was conducted only in the follow-up CMR after resolution of the initial infarct edema. LVEF was measured in both CMR. hs-cTnT levels were assessed at hospital admission, as well as 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h after coronary intervention. Telephone follow-ups were conducted annually for up to 8 years. LGE measurements showed better correlation with MI-free survival (Harrell's C of 0.711 of LGE mass) compared to GZF (0.579 of GZF mass). Additionally, hs-cTnT outperformed GZF (Harrell's C of 0.645). As an univariable predictor for MI-free survival, only hs-cTnT reached significance (p < 0.05). With regard to improvements in ejection fraction, both hs-cTnT and LGE measurements showed acceptable correlation with improvement in ejection fraction (p < 0.05), while GZF measurements showed no correlation (p > 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CMR, the assessment of GZF demonstrated inferior p correlation compared to hs-cTnT and LGE in patients after acute MI with respect to the endpoint of MI-free survival. Furthermore, GZF showed no correlation with the improvement of LVEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"749-759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02536-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02536-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化急性心肌梗死(MI)后患者的灰质纤维化(GZF),并评估其与无心肌梗死存活率和左心室射血分数(LVEF)改善的相关性,并与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)和晚期钆增强(LGE)这两个已确定的风险因素进行比较:这项研究涉及 176 名急性心肌梗死患者,他们在出院前接受了心脏磁共振(CMR)检查,并在平均 6 个月后接受了第二次 CMR 检查。两次检查都对 LGE 进行了量化,仅在最初的梗死水肿消退后的随访 CMR 中对 GZF 进行了单独分析。hs-cTnT 水平在入院时以及冠状动脉介入治疗后 8、16、24、48 和 72 小时进行评估。每年进行一次电话随访,随访时间长达 8 年。LGE 测量结果与无心肌梗死生存率(LGE 质量的 Harrell's C 值为 0.711)的相关性优于 GZF(GZF 质量的 Harrell's C 值为 0.579)。此外,hs-cTnT 也优于 GZF(Harrell's C 为 0.645)。作为无心肌梗死生存率的单变量预测因子,只有 hs-cTnT 具有显著性(P 0.5):结论:在 CMR 中,与 hs-cTnT 和 LGE 相比,在急性心肌梗死后患者的无心肌梗死生存率终点方面,GZF 的评估显示出较低的相关性。此外,GZF 与 LVEF 的改善没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlation of greyzone fibrosis compared to troponin T and late gadolinium enhancement with survival and ejection fraction in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Correlation of greyzone fibrosis compared to troponin T and late gadolinium enhancement with survival and ejection fraction in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Aims: To quantify greyzone fibrosis (GZF) in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and to evaluate its correlation with MI-free survival and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with the established risk factors high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE).

Methods and results: The study involved 176 patients who experienced acute MI and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to hospital discharge, followed by a second CMR on average six months later. LGE was quantified in both examinations, a separate analysis of the GZF was conducted only in the follow-up CMR after resolution of the initial infarct edema. LVEF was measured in both CMR. hs-cTnT levels were assessed at hospital admission, as well as 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h after coronary intervention. Telephone follow-ups were conducted annually for up to 8 years. LGE measurements showed better correlation with MI-free survival (Harrell's C of 0.711 of LGE mass) compared to GZF (0.579 of GZF mass). Additionally, hs-cTnT outperformed GZF (Harrell's C of 0.645). As an univariable predictor for MI-free survival, only hs-cTnT reached significance (p < 0.05). With regard to improvements in ejection fraction, both hs-cTnT and LGE measurements showed acceptable correlation with improvement in ejection fraction (p < 0.05), while GZF measurements showed no correlation (p > 0.5).

Conclusions: In CMR, the assessment of GZF demonstrated inferior p correlation compared to hs-cTnT and LGE in patients after acute MI with respect to the endpoint of MI-free survival. Furthermore, GZF showed no correlation with the improvement of LVEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信