非手术牙周治疗中辅助局部抗菌药对缩小 2 型糖尿病患者牙周袋和控制血糖的疗效:网络 Meta 分析。

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Domitilla Marchiori Sant'Anna Leal de Oliveira, Ana Luiza Magalhães de Souza, Getúlio da Rocha Nogueira Filho, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Cristine Miron Stefani
{"title":"非手术牙周治疗中辅助局部抗菌药对缩小 2 型糖尿病患者牙周袋和控制血糖的疗效:网络 Meta 分析。","authors":"Domitilla Marchiori Sant'Anna Leal de Oliveira, Ana Luiza Magalhães de Souza, Getúlio da Rocha Nogueira Filho, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Cristine Miron Stefani","doi":"10.2174/0115733998320667240805045742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis [NMA] investigated the efficacy of adjunctive use of subgingivally delivered antimicrobials to non-surgical periodontal therapy [NSPT] in the glycemic control and periodontal pocket depth (PPD) reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases, grey literature, and registry platforms were searched up to February 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed through Cochrane's tool (RoB 2). Two frequentist NMA were performed using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MD) as an effect measure and to quantitatively evaluate the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and PPD. The certainty of evidence was assessed through the GRADE approach in a partially contextualized framework for interpreting results. Ten RCTs were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 261 patients were treated with eight different local antimicrobials adjuvants to NSPT (azithromycin gel, clarithromycin gel, tetracycline fiber or ointment, chlorhexidine gel, doxycycline nanospheres, minocycline gel, and satranidazole gel), while 249 patients received NSPT alone or associated to placebo. Considering PPD reduction (8 included studies), the best results were found after six months for satranidazole gel (MD -2.64mm; 95%CI -3.56, -1.72; moderate evidence certainty). For HbA1c control (7 included studies), doxycycline gel (MD - 0.80%; 95%CI -1.70, 0.10), chlorhexidine gel (MD -0.68%; 95%CI -1.34, -0.02), and tetracycline fiber (MD -0.62%; 95%CI -0.85, -0.39) showed promising results after three months (low evidence certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adjunctive use of satranidazole gel probably reduces PPD after a 6-month follow-up, while doxycycline gel, chlorhexidine gel, and tetracycline fiber may decrease HbA1c values in patients with T2D and periodontitis treated with NSPT after a 3-month follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":10825,"journal":{"name":"Current diabetes reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Adjunctive Local Antimicrobials to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Pocket Reduction and Glycemic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Domitilla Marchiori Sant'Anna Leal de Oliveira, Ana Luiza Magalhães de Souza, Getúlio da Rocha Nogueira Filho, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Cristine Miron Stefani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115733998320667240805045742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This network meta-analysis [NMA] investigated the efficacy of adjunctive use of subgingivally delivered antimicrobials to non-surgical periodontal therapy [NSPT] in the glycemic control and periodontal pocket depth (PPD) reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases, grey literature, and registry platforms were searched up to February 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed through Cochrane's tool (RoB 2). Two frequentist NMA were performed using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MD) as an effect measure and to quantitatively evaluate the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and PPD. The certainty of evidence was assessed through the GRADE approach in a partially contextualized framework for interpreting results. Ten RCTs were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 261 patients were treated with eight different local antimicrobials adjuvants to NSPT (azithromycin gel, clarithromycin gel, tetracycline fiber or ointment, chlorhexidine gel, doxycycline nanospheres, minocycline gel, and satranidazole gel), while 249 patients received NSPT alone or associated to placebo. Considering PPD reduction (8 included studies), the best results were found after six months for satranidazole gel (MD -2.64mm; 95%CI -3.56, -1.72; moderate evidence certainty). For HbA1c control (7 included studies), doxycycline gel (MD - 0.80%; 95%CI -1.70, 0.10), chlorhexidine gel (MD -0.68%; 95%CI -1.34, -0.02), and tetracycline fiber (MD -0.62%; 95%CI -0.85, -0.39) showed promising results after three months (low evidence certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adjunctive use of satranidazole gel probably reduces PPD after a 6-month follow-up, while doxycycline gel, chlorhexidine gel, and tetracycline fiber may decrease HbA1c values in patients with T2D and periodontitis treated with NSPT after a 3-month follow up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current diabetes reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current diabetes reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733998320667240805045742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current diabetes reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733998320667240805045742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本网络荟萃分析[NMA]研究了在非手术牙周治疗[NSPT]的基础上辅助使用龈下给药抗菌剂对控制2型糖尿病(T2D)患者血糖和减少牙周袋深度(PPD)的疗效:检索了截至 2024 年 2 月的七个数据库、灰色文献和登记平台,以确定符合资格标准的随机临床试验 (RCT)。通过 Cochrane 工具(RoB 2)评估了偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型进行了两次频数主义 NMA,计算平均差 (MD) 作为效应度量,并对糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c) 和 PPD 进行定量评估。通过 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行了评估,并采用部分情景化框架对结果进行解释。共纳入 10 项 RCT:共有261名患者接受了8种不同的局部抗菌剂辅助NSPT治疗(阿奇霉素凝胶、克拉霉素凝胶、四环素纤维或软膏、洗必泰凝胶、多西环素纳米球、米诺环素凝胶和沙格雷尼达唑凝胶),249名患者单独接受了NSPT治疗或与安慰剂联合使用。考虑到PPD的降低(纳入了8项研究),6个月后发现萨他尼达唑凝胶的效果最好(MD -2.64mm;95%CI -3.56,-1.72;中度证据确定性)。对于 HbA1c 控制(纳入 7 项研究),多西环素凝胶(MD -0.80%;95%CI -1.70, 0.10)、洗必泰凝胶(MD -0.68%;95%CI -1.34, -0.02)和四环素纤维(MD -0.62%;95%CI -0.85, -0.39)在三个月后显示出良好的效果(低证据确定性):结论:在6个月的随访后,辅助使用萨他尼达唑凝胶可能会降低PPD,而多西环素凝胶、洗必泰凝胶和四环素纤维在3个月的随访后可能会降低接受NSPT治疗的T2D和牙周炎患者的HbA1c值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Adjunctive Local Antimicrobials to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Pocket Reduction and Glycemic Control of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Objective: This network meta-analysis [NMA] investigated the efficacy of adjunctive use of subgingivally delivered antimicrobials to non-surgical periodontal therapy [NSPT] in the glycemic control and periodontal pocket depth (PPD) reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: Seven databases, grey literature, and registry platforms were searched up to February 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed through Cochrane's tool (RoB 2). Two frequentist NMA were performed using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MD) as an effect measure and to quantitatively evaluate the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and PPD. The certainty of evidence was assessed through the GRADE approach in a partially contextualized framework for interpreting results. Ten RCTs were included.

Results: In total, 261 patients were treated with eight different local antimicrobials adjuvants to NSPT (azithromycin gel, clarithromycin gel, tetracycline fiber or ointment, chlorhexidine gel, doxycycline nanospheres, minocycline gel, and satranidazole gel), while 249 patients received NSPT alone or associated to placebo. Considering PPD reduction (8 included studies), the best results were found after six months for satranidazole gel (MD -2.64mm; 95%CI -3.56, -1.72; moderate evidence certainty). For HbA1c control (7 included studies), doxycycline gel (MD - 0.80%; 95%CI -1.70, 0.10), chlorhexidine gel (MD -0.68%; 95%CI -1.34, -0.02), and tetracycline fiber (MD -0.62%; 95%CI -0.85, -0.39) showed promising results after three months (low evidence certainty).

Conclusion: The adjunctive use of satranidazole gel probably reduces PPD after a 6-month follow-up, while doxycycline gel, chlorhexidine gel, and tetracycline fiber may decrease HbA1c values in patients with T2D and periodontitis treated with NSPT after a 3-month follow up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current diabetes reviews
Current diabetes reviews ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
期刊介绍: Current Diabetes Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on diabetes and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, complications, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians who are involved in the field of diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信