{"title":"中间逻辑中的统一类型和联合分裂","authors":"Wojciech Dzik , Sławomir Kost , Piotr Wojtylak","doi":"10.1016/j.apal.2024.103508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We classify intermediate logics according to their unification types. There are exactly two minimal intermediate logics with hereditary finitary unification: the least logic with hereditary unitary unification and the least logic with hereditary projective proximity (a notion close to projective approximation of Ghilardi <span><span>[17]</span></span>, <span><span>[18]</span></span>), see Figure 4. They are locally tabular and are union splittings in the lattice <span>Ext INT</span>. There are exactly four maximal intermediate logics with nullary unification (see Figure 21) and they are tabular. Any intermediate logic with neither hereditary unitary unification nor with hereditary projective proximity is included in one of the four logics. There are logics with finitary/unitary (but not hereditary finitary) unification scattered among the majority of those with nullary unification, see Figure 23. Our main tools are the characterization of locally tabular logics with finitary (or unitary) unification, by their Kripke models <span><span>[12]</span></span>, <span><span>[13]</span></span> and splittings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unification types and union splittings in intermediate logics\",\"authors\":\"Wojciech Dzik , Sławomir Kost , Piotr Wojtylak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apal.2024.103508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We classify intermediate logics according to their unification types. There are exactly two minimal intermediate logics with hereditary finitary unification: the least logic with hereditary unitary unification and the least logic with hereditary projective proximity (a notion close to projective approximation of Ghilardi <span><span>[17]</span></span>, <span><span>[18]</span></span>), see Figure 4. They are locally tabular and are union splittings in the lattice <span>Ext INT</span>. There are exactly four maximal intermediate logics with nullary unification (see Figure 21) and they are tabular. Any intermediate logic with neither hereditary unitary unification nor with hereditary projective proximity is included in one of the four logics. There are logics with finitary/unitary (but not hereditary finitary) unification scattered among the majority of those with nullary unification, see Figure 23. Our main tools are the characterization of locally tabular logics with finitary (or unitary) unification, by their Kripke models <span><span>[12]</span></span>, <span><span>[13]</span></span> and splittings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016800722400112X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016800722400112X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们根据统一类型对中间逻辑进行分类。具有遗传有限统一的最小中间逻辑正好有两个:具有遗传单一统一的最小逻辑和具有遗传投影近似的最小逻辑(这一概念接近于吉拉迪的投影近似[17], [18]),见图 4。它们都是局部表格,是网格 Ext INT 中的联合分裂。正好有四个具有空统一的最大中间逻辑(见图 21),它们都是表格逻辑。任何既不具有遗传单元统一性也不具有遗传投影邻近性的中间逻辑都包含在这四个逻辑中。在大多数具有空统一性的逻辑中,还散布着具有有限/单一(但非遗传有限)统一性的逻辑,见图 23。我们的主要工具是通过克里普克模型[12]、[13]和分裂来表征具有有限统一(或单元统一)的局部表逻辑。
Unification types and union splittings in intermediate logics
We classify intermediate logics according to their unification types. There are exactly two minimal intermediate logics with hereditary finitary unification: the least logic with hereditary unitary unification and the least logic with hereditary projective proximity (a notion close to projective approximation of Ghilardi [17], [18]), see Figure 4. They are locally tabular and are union splittings in the lattice Ext INT. There are exactly four maximal intermediate logics with nullary unification (see Figure 21) and they are tabular. Any intermediate logic with neither hereditary unitary unification nor with hereditary projective proximity is included in one of the four logics. There are logics with finitary/unitary (but not hereditary finitary) unification scattered among the majority of those with nullary unification, see Figure 23. Our main tools are the characterization of locally tabular logics with finitary (or unitary) unification, by their Kripke models [12], [13] and splittings.