甲床损伤修复:趾甲板替换与非替换

Eplasty Pub Date : 2024-06-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Justin Rock, Adam Kurland, Dominick V Congiusta, Omkar Baxi, Michael M Vosbikian, Irfan H Ahmed
{"title":"甲床损伤修复:趾甲板替换与非替换","authors":"Justin Rock, Adam Kurland, Dominick V Congiusta, Omkar Baxi, Michael M Vosbikian, Irfan H Ahmed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nail bed injuries are common, there is no consensus on the proper course of treatment in regard to nail plate replacement. Nail plate replacement risks infection and injury of the germinal matrix. It is our hypothesis that functional and cosmetic outcomes of the nail will not differ by nail plate replacement following nail bed repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single institution, prospective, randomized control study comparing nail plate replacement versus non-replacement in patients undergoing nail bed repair. Primary outcome included nail growth and cosmesis using the Zook classification system. Secondary outcomes were pain, functional limitation, and patient satisfaction. Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were enrolled, 26 (52%) randomized to the non-replacement group and 24 (48%) to the replacement group. All patients who followed up had nail growth by 4 months after nail bed repair (N = 28). In the non-replacement group 4 patients continued to have pain in the affected nail bed compared with 2 patients in the replacement group (<i>P</i> = .66). One patient in each group reported continued functional limitation related to nail pain (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between the groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). As a result of patient follow- up, we have been able to score 17 patients via the Zook criteria. In the non-replacement group, 3 nails were scored as excellent, 3 very good, 3 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor. In the replacement group, the nail was classified as excellent in 4 patients and very good in 1 patient. There was no difference in the likelihood of these outcomes with regard to treatment group (<i>P</i> = .18). There was moderate agreement between patient satisfaction and the Zook criteria scoring (κ = .45, 95% CI: -0.15-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Statistical and clinical differences were not identified in regard to cosmesis, pain, functional use of the hand, or patient satisfaction. There are established risks involved in nail plate replacement such as infection and injury to the germinal matrix. If outcomes are not different based on nail plate replacement following nail bed repair, non- replacement may be the preferable treatment option so as to avoid these complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93993,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"24 ","pages":"e37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nail Bed Injury Repair: Nail Plate Replacement Versus Non-replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Rock, Adam Kurland, Dominick V Congiusta, Omkar Baxi, Michael M Vosbikian, Irfan H Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nail bed injuries are common, there is no consensus on the proper course of treatment in regard to nail plate replacement. Nail plate replacement risks infection and injury of the germinal matrix. It is our hypothesis that functional and cosmetic outcomes of the nail will not differ by nail plate replacement following nail bed repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single institution, prospective, randomized control study comparing nail plate replacement versus non-replacement in patients undergoing nail bed repair. Primary outcome included nail growth and cosmesis using the Zook classification system. Secondary outcomes were pain, functional limitation, and patient satisfaction. Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were enrolled, 26 (52%) randomized to the non-replacement group and 24 (48%) to the replacement group. All patients who followed up had nail growth by 4 months after nail bed repair (N = 28). In the non-replacement group 4 patients continued to have pain in the affected nail bed compared with 2 patients in the replacement group (<i>P</i> = .66). One patient in each group reported continued functional limitation related to nail pain (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between the groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). As a result of patient follow- up, we have been able to score 17 patients via the Zook criteria. In the non-replacement group, 3 nails were scored as excellent, 3 very good, 3 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor. In the replacement group, the nail was classified as excellent in 4 patients and very good in 1 patient. There was no difference in the likelihood of these outcomes with regard to treatment group (<i>P</i> = .18). There was moderate agreement between patient satisfaction and the Zook criteria scoring (κ = .45, 95% CI: -0.15-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Statistical and clinical differences were not identified in regard to cosmesis, pain, functional use of the hand, or patient satisfaction. There are established risks involved in nail plate replacement such as infection and injury to the germinal matrix. If outcomes are not different based on nail plate replacement following nail bed repair, non- replacement may be the preferable treatment option so as to avoid these complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"e37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然甲床损伤很常见,但对于甲板置换的正确治疗方法还没有达成共识。置换甲板有感染和损伤生发基质的风险。我们的假设是,在甲床修复后更换甲板,指甲的功能和外观效果不会有差异:这是一项单机构、前瞻性、随机对照研究,比较了甲床修复术后患者更换甲板与不更换甲板的情况。主要结果包括使用 Zook 分类系统的指甲生长和外观。次要结果包括疼痛、功能限制和患者满意度。统计显著性以 P < .05 为标准:共有 50 名患者入选,其中 26 人(52%)被随机分配到非置换组,24 人(48%)被分配到置换组。所有接受随访的患者在甲床修复 4 个月后指甲均有生长(28 人)。在非置换组中,有 4 名患者受影响的甲床持续疼痛,而在置换组中,有 2 名患者持续疼痛(P = 0.66)。每组中都有一名患者称其功能继续受到指甲疼痛的限制(P = 1.00)。两组患者的满意度无统计学差异(P = 1.00)。通过对患者进行随访,我们已经能够根据 Zook 标准对 17 名患者进行评分。在未更换钉子组中,3 个钉子被评为优,3 个很好,3 个好,1 个一般,2 个差。在更换钉子组中,4 名患者的钉子被评为优,1 名患者的钉子被评为良。这些结果的可能性与治疗组没有差异(P = .18)。患者满意度与 Zook 标准评分之间存在中等程度的一致性(κ = .45,95% CI:-0.15-1.00):在外观、疼痛、手部功能使用或患者满意度方面,未发现统计和临床差异。甲板置换术存在既定的风险,如感染和对生殖基质的损伤。如果在甲床修复后进行甲板置换术的结果没有差异,那么为避免这些并发症,不置换甲板可能是更可取的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nail Bed Injury Repair: Nail Plate Replacement Versus Non-replacement.

Background: Although nail bed injuries are common, there is no consensus on the proper course of treatment in regard to nail plate replacement. Nail plate replacement risks infection and injury of the germinal matrix. It is our hypothesis that functional and cosmetic outcomes of the nail will not differ by nail plate replacement following nail bed repair.

Methods: This is a single institution, prospective, randomized control study comparing nail plate replacement versus non-replacement in patients undergoing nail bed repair. Primary outcome included nail growth and cosmesis using the Zook classification system. Secondary outcomes were pain, functional limitation, and patient satisfaction. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, 26 (52%) randomized to the non-replacement group and 24 (48%) to the replacement group. All patients who followed up had nail growth by 4 months after nail bed repair (N = 28). In the non-replacement group 4 patients continued to have pain in the affected nail bed compared with 2 patients in the replacement group (P = .66). One patient in each group reported continued functional limitation related to nail pain (P = 1.00). Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between the groups (P = 1.00). As a result of patient follow- up, we have been able to score 17 patients via the Zook criteria. In the non-replacement group, 3 nails were scored as excellent, 3 very good, 3 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor. In the replacement group, the nail was classified as excellent in 4 patients and very good in 1 patient. There was no difference in the likelihood of these outcomes with regard to treatment group (P = .18). There was moderate agreement between patient satisfaction and the Zook criteria scoring (κ = .45, 95% CI: -0.15-1.00).

Conclusions: Statistical and clinical differences were not identified in regard to cosmesis, pain, functional use of the hand, or patient satisfaction. There are established risks involved in nail plate replacement such as infection and injury to the germinal matrix. If outcomes are not different based on nail plate replacement following nail bed repair, non- replacement may be the preferable treatment option so as to avoid these complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信