双静脉栓塞术中的经股静脉肝静脉入路--初步经验和可行性。

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ulrik Carling, Sigurd Berger, Eyvind Gjønnæss, Bård Røsok, Sheraz Yaqub, Kristoffer Lassen, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Eric Dorenberg
{"title":"双静脉栓塞术中的经股静脉肝静脉入路--初步经验和可行性。","authors":"Ulrik Carling, Sigurd Berger, Eyvind Gjønnæss, Bård Røsok, Sheraz Yaqub, Kristoffer Lassen, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Eric Dorenberg","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic vein embolization in double vein embolization (DVE) can be performed with transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral access. This study evaluates the feasibility and technical success of using a transfemoral access for the hepatic vein embolization in patients undergoing preoperative to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of single center cohort including 17 consecutive patients. The baseline standardized FLR was 18.2% (range 14.7-24.9). Portal vein embolization was performed with vascular plugs and glue through an ipsilateral transhepatic access. Hepatic vein embolization was performed using vascular plugs. Access for the hepatic vein was either transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral. Technical success, number of hepatic veins embolized and complications were registered. In addition, volumetric data including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR), and resection data were registered. R: Seven of the 17 patients had transfemoral hepatic vein embolization, with 100% technical success. No severe complications were registered. In the whole cohort, the median number of hepatic veins embolized was 2 (1-6). DH was 8.6% (3.0-19.4) and KGR was 3.6%/week (1.4-7.4), without significant differences between the patients having transfemoral versus transhepatic /transjugular access (p = 0.48 and 0.54 respectively). Time from DVE to surgery was median 4.8 weeks (2.6-33.9) for the whole cohort, with one patient declining surgery, two having explorative laparotomy and one patient having change of surgical strategy due to insufficient growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transfemoral access is a feasible option with a high degree of technical success for hepatic vein embolization in patients with small future liver remnants needing DVE.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization - initial experience and feasibility.\",\"authors\":\"Ulrik Carling, Sigurd Berger, Eyvind Gjønnæss, Bård Røsok, Sheraz Yaqub, Kristoffer Lassen, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Eric Dorenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic vein embolization in double vein embolization (DVE) can be performed with transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral access. This study evaluates the feasibility and technical success of using a transfemoral access for the hepatic vein embolization in patients undergoing preoperative to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of single center cohort including 17 consecutive patients. The baseline standardized FLR was 18.2% (range 14.7-24.9). Portal vein embolization was performed with vascular plugs and glue through an ipsilateral transhepatic access. Hepatic vein embolization was performed using vascular plugs. Access for the hepatic vein was either transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral. Technical success, number of hepatic veins embolized and complications were registered. In addition, volumetric data including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR), and resection data were registered. R: Seven of the 17 patients had transfemoral hepatic vein embolization, with 100% technical success. No severe complications were registered. In the whole cohort, the median number of hepatic veins embolized was 2 (1-6). DH was 8.6% (3.0-19.4) and KGR was 3.6%/week (1.4-7.4), without significant differences between the patients having transfemoral versus transhepatic /transjugular access (p = 0.48 and 0.54 respectively). Time from DVE to surgery was median 4.8 weeks (2.6-33.9) for the whole cohort, with one patient declining surgery, two having explorative laparotomy and one patient having change of surgical strategy due to insufficient growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transfemoral access is a feasible option with a high degree of technical success for hepatic vein embolization in patients with small future liver remnants needing DVE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00478-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双静脉栓塞术(DVE)中的肝静脉栓塞可通过经肝、经颈静脉或经口入路进行。本研究评估了在接受术前诱导未来残肝(FLR)肥大的患者中使用经股静脉入路进行肝静脉栓塞的可行性和技术成功率:单中心队列回顾性分析,包括17例连续患者。基线标准化FLR为18.2%(范围14.7-24.9)。门静脉栓塞术通过同侧经肝入路使用血管塞和胶水进行。肝静脉栓塞术使用血管塞。肝静脉的入路可以是经肝、经颈静脉或经股动脉。对技术成功率、栓塞的肝静脉数量和并发症进行了登记。此外,还登记了包括肥大程度(DH)和动力学生长率(KGR)在内的体积数据以及切除数据。结果:17 例患者中有 7 例进行了经腹肝静脉栓塞,技术成功率为 100%。未出现严重并发症。在所有患者中,肝静脉栓塞的中位数为 2(1-6)。DH为8.6% (3.0-19.4),KGR为3.6%/周 (1.4-7.4),经股动脉入路与经肝/经颈静脉入路的患者之间无显著差异(P = 0.48和0.54)。从DVE到手术的中位时间为4.8周(2.6-33.9周),其中一名患者拒绝手术,两名患者进行了探查性开腹手术,一名患者因生长不足而改变了手术策略:经股动脉入路是一种可行的肝静脉栓塞术方案,对于需要进行肝静脉栓塞术(DVE)的未来小肝脏残留患者来说,其技术成功率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization - initial experience and feasibility.

Background: Hepatic vein embolization in double vein embolization (DVE) can be performed with transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral access. This study evaluates the feasibility and technical success of using a transfemoral access for the hepatic vein embolization in patients undergoing preoperative to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of single center cohort including 17 consecutive patients. The baseline standardized FLR was 18.2% (range 14.7-24.9). Portal vein embolization was performed with vascular plugs and glue through an ipsilateral transhepatic access. Hepatic vein embolization was performed using vascular plugs. Access for the hepatic vein was either transhepatic, transjugular or transfemoral. Technical success, number of hepatic veins embolized and complications were registered. In addition, volumetric data including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR), and resection data were registered. R: Seven of the 17 patients had transfemoral hepatic vein embolization, with 100% technical success. No severe complications were registered. In the whole cohort, the median number of hepatic veins embolized was 2 (1-6). DH was 8.6% (3.0-19.4) and KGR was 3.6%/week (1.4-7.4), without significant differences between the patients having transfemoral versus transhepatic /transjugular access (p = 0.48 and 0.54 respectively). Time from DVE to surgery was median 4.8 weeks (2.6-33.9) for the whole cohort, with one patient declining surgery, two having explorative laparotomy and one patient having change of surgical strategy due to insufficient growth.

Conclusion: Transfemoral access is a feasible option with a high degree of technical success for hepatic vein embolization in patients with small future liver remnants needing DVE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信