关节线偏斜角受髋关节外展和内收的显著影响:模拟分析。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Marco Bechis, Francesco Liberace, Antonino Cantivalli, Federica Rosso, Roberto Rossi, Davide E Bonasia
{"title":"关节线偏斜角受髋关节外展和内收的显著影响:模拟分析。","authors":"Marco Bechis, Francesco Liberace, Antonino Cantivalli, Federica Rosso, Roberto Rossi, Davide E Bonasia","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Different methods for quantifying joint-line obliquity (JLO) have been described, including joint-line obliquity angle (JLOA), Mikulicz joint-line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The goal of the present study was to quantify the variation of JLOA based on the position of the hip. The hypothesis of our study is that JLO is significantly influenced by the abduction/adduction of the limb, unlike MJLA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred long-leg-weightbearing X-rays were used. At time 0 and after 30 days, two observers performed different measurements, including (1) distance between pubic symphysis and center of the femoral head, (2) distance between center of the femoral head and center of the ankle joint, (3) distance between center of the ankle and medial malleolus, (4) hip-knee-ankle angle, (5) MPTA, (6) lateral distal femoral angle, (7) joint-line congruency angle, (8) JLOA, (9) MJL and (10) angle between Mikulicz line and line perpendicular to the ground. The changes of the JLOA based on the position of the hip (abducted, neutral, bipedal stance adduction and monopodal stance adduction) were calculated with trigonometric formulas and with simulation on an orthopaedic planning digital software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The JLOA change between adducted and abducted positions was on average 12.8° (SD 0.9 mm). The MJL did not vary significantly based on hip position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adduction/abduction of the lower limb has a considerable impact on JLOA. Methods like MJLA which are not affected by hip position should be preferred for JLO evaluation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic study, level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint-line obliquity angle is significantly affected by hip abduction and adduction: A simulated analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Bechis, Francesco Liberace, Antonino Cantivalli, Federica Rosso, Roberto Rossi, Davide E Bonasia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Different methods for quantifying joint-line obliquity (JLO) have been described, including joint-line obliquity angle (JLOA), Mikulicz joint-line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The goal of the present study was to quantify the variation of JLOA based on the position of the hip. The hypothesis of our study is that JLO is significantly influenced by the abduction/adduction of the limb, unlike MJLA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred long-leg-weightbearing X-rays were used. At time 0 and after 30 days, two observers performed different measurements, including (1) distance between pubic symphysis and center of the femoral head, (2) distance between center of the femoral head and center of the ankle joint, (3) distance between center of the ankle and medial malleolus, (4) hip-knee-ankle angle, (5) MPTA, (6) lateral distal femoral angle, (7) joint-line congruency angle, (8) JLOA, (9) MJL and (10) angle between Mikulicz line and line perpendicular to the ground. The changes of the JLOA based on the position of the hip (abducted, neutral, bipedal stance adduction and monopodal stance adduction) were calculated with trigonometric formulas and with simulation on an orthopaedic planning digital software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The JLOA change between adducted and abducted positions was on average 12.8° (SD 0.9 mm). The MJL did not vary significantly based on hip position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adduction/abduction of the lower limb has a considerable impact on JLOA. Methods like MJLA which are not affected by hip position should be preferred for JLO evaluation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic study, level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:已有不同的方法用于量化关节线倾斜度(JLO),包括关节线倾斜角(JLOA)、Mikulicz 关节线角(MJLA)和胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)。本研究的目的是量化 JLOA 因髋关节位置而产生的变化。我们的研究假设是,与 MJLA 不同,JLO 受肢体外展/内收的影响很大:方法:使用 100 张长腿负重 X 光片。方法:使用 100 张长腿负重 X 光片,在 0 天时和 30 天后,由两名观察者进行不同的测量,包括(1)耻骨联合与股骨头中心之间的距离;(2)股骨头中心与踝关节中心之间的距离;(3)股骨头中心与踝关节中心之间的距离、(3)踝关节中心与内侧踝骨之间的距离;(4)髋-膝-踝角度;(5)MPTA;(6)股骨外侧远端角度;(7)关节线同位角度;(8)JLOA;(9)MJL;(10)Mikulicz 线与垂直于地面的线之间的角度。根据髋关节的位置(外展、中立、双足站立内收和单足站立内收),利用三角公式和骨科规划数字软件模拟计算了 JLOA 的变化:内收和外展姿势之间的 JLOA 平均变化为 12.8°(SD 0.9 毫米)。结论:髋关节的内收/外展位置与髋关节的MJL变化不大:结论:下肢的内收/外展对 JLOA 有相当大的影响。在评估 JLO 时,应首选不受髋关节位置影响的 MJLA 等方法:诊断性研究,III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joint-line obliquity angle is significantly affected by hip abduction and adduction: A simulated analysis.

Purpose: Different methods for quantifying joint-line obliquity (JLO) have been described, including joint-line obliquity angle (JLOA), Mikulicz joint-line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The goal of the present study was to quantify the variation of JLOA based on the position of the hip. The hypothesis of our study is that JLO is significantly influenced by the abduction/adduction of the limb, unlike MJLA.

Methods: One hundred long-leg-weightbearing X-rays were used. At time 0 and after 30 days, two observers performed different measurements, including (1) distance between pubic symphysis and center of the femoral head, (2) distance between center of the femoral head and center of the ankle joint, (3) distance between center of the ankle and medial malleolus, (4) hip-knee-ankle angle, (5) MPTA, (6) lateral distal femoral angle, (7) joint-line congruency angle, (8) JLOA, (9) MJL and (10) angle between Mikulicz line and line perpendicular to the ground. The changes of the JLOA based on the position of the hip (abducted, neutral, bipedal stance adduction and monopodal stance adduction) were calculated with trigonometric formulas and with simulation on an orthopaedic planning digital software.

Results: The JLOA change between adducted and abducted positions was on average 12.8° (SD 0.9 mm). The MJL did not vary significantly based on hip position.

Conclusions: The adduction/abduction of the lower limb has a considerable impact on JLOA. Methods like MJLA which are not affected by hip position should be preferred for JLO evaluation.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic study, level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信