预防方案可减少接受分支式/开孔式血管内主动脉修复术患者的脊髓缺血。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Angela D. Sickels MD , Zdenek Novak MD, PhD , Salvatore T. Scali MD , Rebecca St. John RN , Benjamin J. Pearce MD , Jarrad W. Rowse MD , Adam W. Beck MD
{"title":"预防方案可减少接受分支式/开孔式血管内主动脉修复术患者的脊髓缺血。","authors":"Angela D. Sickels MD ,&nbsp;Zdenek Novak MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Salvatore T. Scali MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca St. John RN ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Pearce MD ,&nbsp;Jarrad W. Rowse MD ,&nbsp;Adam W. Beck MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair (B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida and the University of Alabama at Birmingham) since inception.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015 to December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort (n = 402) and were compared with the pre-protocol cohort (n = 160; January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence, and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysm dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, although more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (86.1% vs 55.0%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Thoracoabdominal aneurysm was the most common indication in both groups. Cerebrospinal fluid drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients vs 3.0% of post-protocol patients (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs 5.0%, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Thirty-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs 2.2%; <em>P</em> = .02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs 88.3%; log-rank <em>P</em> = .35). Among patients with SCI, 1-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively (<em>P</em> = .46).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in patients undergoing B/FEVAR, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall 1-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among patients with SCI highlights the importance of preventative measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"81 1","pages":"Pages 29-37.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prevention protocol reduces spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair\",\"authors\":\"Angela D. Sickels MD ,&nbsp;Zdenek Novak MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Salvatore T. Scali MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca St. John RN ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Pearce MD ,&nbsp;Jarrad W. Rowse MD ,&nbsp;Adam W. Beck MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair (B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida and the University of Alabama at Birmingham) since inception.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015 to December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort (n = 402) and were compared with the pre-protocol cohort (n = 160; January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence, and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysm dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, although more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (86.1% vs 55.0%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Thoracoabdominal aneurysm was the most common indication in both groups. Cerebrospinal fluid drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients vs 3.0% of post-protocol patients (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs 5.0%, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Thirty-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs 2.2%; <em>P</em> = .02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs 88.3%; log-rank <em>P</em> = .35). Among patients with SCI, 1-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively (<em>P</em> = .46).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in patients undergoing B/FEVAR, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall 1-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among patients with SCI highlights the importance of preventative measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-37.e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521424018160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521424018160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脊髓缺血(SCI)是胸腹主动脉修补术的一种破坏性并发症,主动脉覆盖长度增加时风险更高,这使得接受分枝/穿孔血管内修补术(B/FEVAR)的患者特别容易发生脊髓缺血。之前有报道称,在一项单中心研究中,与历史队列相比,捆绑式 SCI 预防方案可降低 SCI 发生率。因此,本分析旨在进一步验证和更新与该方案相关的结果,因为自该方案开始实施以来,已有两家机构(佛罗里达大学和阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校)例行实施了该策略:SCI 预防方案包括选择性脑脊液 (CSF) 引流、特定血压参数、输血目标和选择性药物辅助(纳洛酮、类固醇)。该方案于 2015 年 5 月开始常规实施。2015年5月至2022年12月期间接受B/FEVAR手术的患者构成协议后队列(n=402),并与协议前队列(n=160,2010年1月至2015年4月)进行比较。主要结果是SCI发生率,并对被视为高风险的患者(克劳福德I-III度胸腹动脉瘤(TAAA)夹层相关疾病、既往主动脉修复、5区近端覆盖)进行了亚组分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行生存分析:结果:方案实施前和方案实施后两组患者的人口统计学特征相似,但方案实施后的患者中美国麻醉学会(ASA)IV级患者较多(86.1% vs. 55.0%; pConclusion):实施捆绑式SCI预防方案可显著降低B/FEVAR患者的SCI发生率,该方案现已在两家机构得到验证,其中高危患者的SCI发生率降低最为显著。虽然两组患者的总体一年死亡率差异不大,但 SCI 患者的高死亡率凸显了预防措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prevention protocol reduces spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

Objective

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair (B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida and the University of Alabama at Birmingham) since inception.

Methods

Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015 to December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort (n = 402) and were compared with the pre-protocol cohort (n = 160; January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence, and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysm dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, although more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (86.1% vs 55.0%; P < .001). Thoracoabdominal aneurysm was the most common indication in both groups. Cerebrospinal fluid drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients vs 3.0% of post-protocol patients (P < .001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs 5.0%, respectively (P < .001). Thirty-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs 2.2%; P = .02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs 88.3%; log-rank P = .35). Among patients with SCI, 1-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively (P = .46).

Conclusions

Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in patients undergoing B/FEVAR, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall 1-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among patients with SCI highlights the importance of preventative measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信