Lauren T Dickman, Kelsey Bauman, Christopher K Carter, Paula M Buchanan
{"title":"药剂师干预对重症监护室出院后继续不当使用抗精神病药物的影响。","authors":"Lauren T Dickman, Kelsey Bauman, Christopher K Carter, Paula M Buchanan","doi":"10.1177/08971900241281397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Transitions of care (TOC) are important to best practices as they are at times prone to medication errors. The intensive care unit (ICU) is an essential location needing effective TOC due to many reasons, but an important one being that certain medications are only indicated there. One example is antipsychotics used for agitation, delirium, and sedation. <b>Objective:</b> To design, implement, and analyze the benefit of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate antipsychotic continuation from the ICU to another point in care at a small community hospital. Secondary outcomes include patients discharged from the hospital on antipsychotics inappropriately and accepted pharmacist interventions. <b>Methods:</b> This standard of care, prospective with historical control study included adult patients who were ordered a formulary antipsychotic for delirium, agitation, or sedation during their ICU-level of care admission at SSM Health: St. Clare Hospital- Fenton. <b>Results:</b> There were 33 patients in the historical period and 24 in the intervention period. Those in the intervention period were less likely to have a continuation of antipsychotics beyond 72 hours compared to patients in the historical period (16.7% vs 57.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.002). In addition, patients in the intervention period were less likely to have continuation of antipsychotics when discharged to home (12.5% vs 36.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> A pharmacist-driven intervention led to a significant decrease in patients continuing antipsychotics upon ICU discharge. This decrease was seen at both 72 hours from patients leaving the ICU and at hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Pharmacist Intervention on Inappropriate Continuations of Antipsychotics upon ICU Discharge.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren T Dickman, Kelsey Bauman, Christopher K Carter, Paula M Buchanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900241281397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Transitions of care (TOC) are important to best practices as they are at times prone to medication errors. The intensive care unit (ICU) is an essential location needing effective TOC due to many reasons, but an important one being that certain medications are only indicated there. One example is antipsychotics used for agitation, delirium, and sedation. <b>Objective:</b> To design, implement, and analyze the benefit of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate antipsychotic continuation from the ICU to another point in care at a small community hospital. Secondary outcomes include patients discharged from the hospital on antipsychotics inappropriately and accepted pharmacist interventions. <b>Methods:</b> This standard of care, prospective with historical control study included adult patients who were ordered a formulary antipsychotic for delirium, agitation, or sedation during their ICU-level of care admission at SSM Health: St. Clare Hospital- Fenton. <b>Results:</b> There were 33 patients in the historical period and 24 in the intervention period. Those in the intervention period were less likely to have a continuation of antipsychotics beyond 72 hours compared to patients in the historical period (16.7% vs 57.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.002). In addition, patients in the intervention period were less likely to have continuation of antipsychotics when discharged to home (12.5% vs 36.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> A pharmacist-driven intervention led to a significant decrease in patients continuing antipsychotics upon ICU discharge. This decrease was seen at both 72 hours from patients leaving the ICU and at hospital discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241281397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241281397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:护理过渡(TOC)对最佳实践非常重要,因为有时很容易出现用药错误。重症监护病房(ICU)是需要有效过渡护理的重要场所,原因有很多,但其中一个重要原因是某些药物只适用于重症监护病房。其中一个例子就是用于治疗躁动、谵妄和镇静的抗精神病药物。目标:在一家小型社区医院中,设计、实施并分析药剂师干预措施对不适当的抗精神病药物从重症监护室延续到其他护理点的益处。次要结果包括使用抗精神病药物不当的出院患者以及接受药剂师干预的患者。方法:这项具有历史对照的前瞻性标准护理研究纳入了在 SSM Health 的 ICU 级护理住院期间因谵妄、躁动或镇静而被处方抗精神病药物的成年患者:Clare Hospital- Fenton。结果:历史阶段有 33 名患者,干预阶段有 24 名患者。与历史时期的患者相比,干预时期的患者在 72 小时后继续使用抗精神病药物的可能性较低(16.7% vs 57.6%,P = 0.002)。此外,干预期患者出院回家后继续服用抗精神病药物的可能性也较低(12.5% vs 36.4%,P = 0.04)。结论药剂师主导的干预措施显著减少了患者在出院后继续服用抗精神病药物的情况。这种减少在患者离开重症监护室 72 小时后和出院时均可看到。
Impact of Pharmacist Intervention on Inappropriate Continuations of Antipsychotics upon ICU Discharge.
Background: Transitions of care (TOC) are important to best practices as they are at times prone to medication errors. The intensive care unit (ICU) is an essential location needing effective TOC due to many reasons, but an important one being that certain medications are only indicated there. One example is antipsychotics used for agitation, delirium, and sedation. Objective: To design, implement, and analyze the benefit of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate antipsychotic continuation from the ICU to another point in care at a small community hospital. Secondary outcomes include patients discharged from the hospital on antipsychotics inappropriately and accepted pharmacist interventions. Methods: This standard of care, prospective with historical control study included adult patients who were ordered a formulary antipsychotic for delirium, agitation, or sedation during their ICU-level of care admission at SSM Health: St. Clare Hospital- Fenton. Results: There were 33 patients in the historical period and 24 in the intervention period. Those in the intervention period were less likely to have a continuation of antipsychotics beyond 72 hours compared to patients in the historical period (16.7% vs 57.6%, P = 0.002). In addition, patients in the intervention period were less likely to have continuation of antipsychotics when discharged to home (12.5% vs 36.4%, P = 0.04). Conclusions: A pharmacist-driven intervention led to a significant decrease in patients continuing antipsychotics upon ICU discharge. This decrease was seen at both 72 hours from patients leaving the ICU and at hospital discharge.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.