肝移植受者术后吞咽困难的预测因素。

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2024.1415141
Marian Isdahl, Lily Katz, Michaela Johnson, Glen Leverson, David Al-Adra, Susan Thibeault
{"title":"肝移植受者术后吞咽困难的预测因素。","authors":"Marian Isdahl, Lily Katz, Michaela Johnson, Glen Leverson, David Al-Adra, Susan Thibeault","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1415141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver transplant recipients are at a heightened risk for oropharyngeal dysphagia; identification of those who are at high risk for postoperative dysphagia could reduce hospital costs and length of stay. We sought to identify predictors of dysphagia, in a large cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records were queried for patients undergoing liver transplantation, who underwent instrumental swallowing evaluations. Demographics, functional outcomes, and interventions were collected. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-five patients met inclusionary criteria. Multivariate analyses found ethnic group (<i>p</i> = .0191), MELD Score (<i>p</i> < 0001), cold ischemia time (<i>p</i> = .0123), and length of intubation (<i>p</i> < .0001) to be predictors of post-operative development of dysphagia. Pre-transplant dialysis (<i>p</i> < .0001), dysphagia related to end stage liver disease (<i>p</i> < .0001), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (<i>p</i> < .0001), wait time to transplant (<i>p</i> = 0.0173), surgery time (<i>p</i> = 0.0095), tracheostomy (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and transfusion of intraoperative RBC (<i>p</i> < .0001), intraoperative platelets (<i>p</i> = 0.0018), intraoperative FFP (<i>p</i> = 0.0495), perioperative FFP (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), perioperative platelets (<i>p</i> = 0.0151) and perioperative RBC (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) were variables of significance associated with the development of postoperative dysphagia from univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results propose a set of predictors that should be considered when identifying post-operative critically ill patients at risk for dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors for postoperative dysphagia in liver transplant recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Marian Isdahl, Lily Katz, Michaela Johnson, Glen Leverson, David Al-Adra, Susan Thibeault\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frtra.2024.1415141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver transplant recipients are at a heightened risk for oropharyngeal dysphagia; identification of those who are at high risk for postoperative dysphagia could reduce hospital costs and length of stay. We sought to identify predictors of dysphagia, in a large cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records were queried for patients undergoing liver transplantation, who underwent instrumental swallowing evaluations. Demographics, functional outcomes, and interventions were collected. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-five patients met inclusionary criteria. Multivariate analyses found ethnic group (<i>p</i> = .0191), MELD Score (<i>p</i> < 0001), cold ischemia time (<i>p</i> = .0123), and length of intubation (<i>p</i> < .0001) to be predictors of post-operative development of dysphagia. Pre-transplant dialysis (<i>p</i> < .0001), dysphagia related to end stage liver disease (<i>p</i> < .0001), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (<i>p</i> < .0001), wait time to transplant (<i>p</i> = 0.0173), surgery time (<i>p</i> = 0.0095), tracheostomy (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and transfusion of intraoperative RBC (<i>p</i> < .0001), intraoperative platelets (<i>p</i> = 0.0018), intraoperative FFP (<i>p</i> = 0.0495), perioperative FFP (<i>p</i> = 0.0002), perioperative platelets (<i>p</i> = 0.0151) and perioperative RBC (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) were variables of significance associated with the development of postoperative dysphagia from univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results propose a set of predictors that should be considered when identifying post-operative critically ill patients at risk for dysphagia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1415141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1415141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肝移植受者发生口咽吞咽困难的风险较高;识别术后吞咽困难的高危人群可减少住院费用和住院时间。我们试图在一大批接受肝移植的患者中找出吞咽困难的预测因素:方法: 我们查询了接受肝脏移植手术的患者的电子病历,这些患者都接受了仪器吞咽评估。收集了人口统计学、功能结果和干预措施。进行逻辑回归分析以确定吞咽困难的预测因素:结果:795 名患者符合纳入标准。多变量分析发现种族群体(p = .0191)、MELD 评分(p p = .0123)、插管时间(p p p p = 0.0173)、手术时间(p = 0.0095)、气管切开术(p < 0.0001)、术中输注红细胞(p p = 0.0018)、术中 FFP(p = 0.0495)、围手术期 FFP(p = 0.0002)、围手术期血小板(p = 0.0151)和围手术期 RBC(p = 0.0002)是与术后吞咽困难发生有显著相关性的单变量分析变量:我们的研究结果提出了一系列预测因素,在确定术后危重病人是否有吞咽困难风险时应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors for postoperative dysphagia in liver transplant recipients.

Introduction: Liver transplant recipients are at a heightened risk for oropharyngeal dysphagia; identification of those who are at high risk for postoperative dysphagia could reduce hospital costs and length of stay. We sought to identify predictors of dysphagia, in a large cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation.

Methods: Electronic medical records were queried for patients undergoing liver transplantation, who underwent instrumental swallowing evaluations. Demographics, functional outcomes, and interventions were collected. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of dysphagia.

Results: Seven hundred and ninety-five patients met inclusionary criteria. Multivariate analyses found ethnic group (p = .0191), MELD Score (p < 0001), cold ischemia time (p = .0123), and length of intubation (p < .0001) to be predictors of post-operative development of dysphagia. Pre-transplant dialysis (p < .0001), dysphagia related to end stage liver disease (p < .0001), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (p < .0001), wait time to transplant (p = 0.0173), surgery time (p = 0.0095), tracheostomy (p < 0.0001), and transfusion of intraoperative RBC (p < .0001), intraoperative platelets (p = 0.0018), intraoperative FFP (p = 0.0495), perioperative FFP (p = 0.0002), perioperative platelets (p = 0.0151) and perioperative RBC (p = 0.0002) were variables of significance associated with the development of postoperative dysphagia from univariate analysis.

Conclusions: Our results propose a set of predictors that should be considered when identifying post-operative critically ill patients at risk for dysphagia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信