居家护理:传统护理水平的替代方案。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Emily R. Downing MD, Sandra R. Castro-Pearson MS, PhD, Abbey C. Sidebottom MPH, PhD, Timothy D. Sielaff MD, PhD
{"title":"居家护理:传统护理水平的替代方案。","authors":"Emily R. Downing MD,&nbsp;Sandra R. Castro-Pearson MS, PhD,&nbsp;Abbey C. Sidebottom MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Timothy D. Sielaff MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Elevated care at home (ECH) is a novel in-home care model supporting early hospital discharge and providing an alternative to institutional postacute care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study compares patient characteristics, mortality, and readmission outcomes of hospitalized patients who transitioned to ECH to patients who transitioned to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and skilled home health services (SHH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study of patients between May 2020 and January 2022 transitioned from the hospital to ECH, SNF, or SHH. The analysis compared patient characteristics, 30-day mortality, and readmission stratified by COVID-19 infection status. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression after propensity score matching.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 32,132 eligible patients, 6.3% were transitioned to ECH, 39.7% to SNF, and 54.0% to SHH. After matching, all baseline characteristics except for age were balanced between groups. Postmatch and adjusting for age differences, ECH patients experienced lower risk of death compared to SNF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.92) and similar risk of hospital readmission compared to SNF patients (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89, 1.31) and SHH patients (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). COVID-19-negative ECH patients compared to matched SNF patients were more likely to readmit (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02, 1.65) with no significant difference in risk of mortality (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.44, 1.18).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ECH had similar or improved outcomes relative to SNF and SHH. COVID-19-negative ECH patients experienced higher readmissions relative to SNF. ECH supported patients to return home from the hospital and provided an alternative to an institutional postacute setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 2","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated care at home: An alternative to traditional levels of care\",\"authors\":\"Emily R. Downing MD,&nbsp;Sandra R. Castro-Pearson MS, PhD,&nbsp;Abbey C. Sidebottom MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Timothy D. Sielaff MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Elevated care at home (ECH) is a novel in-home care model supporting early hospital discharge and providing an alternative to institutional postacute care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study compares patient characteristics, mortality, and readmission outcomes of hospitalized patients who transitioned to ECH to patients who transitioned to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and skilled home health services (SHH).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective study of patients between May 2020 and January 2022 transitioned from the hospital to ECH, SNF, or SHH. The analysis compared patient characteristics, 30-day mortality, and readmission stratified by COVID-19 infection status. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression after propensity score matching.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 32,132 eligible patients, 6.3% were transitioned to ECH, 39.7% to SNF, and 54.0% to SHH. After matching, all baseline characteristics except for age were balanced between groups. Postmatch and adjusting for age differences, ECH patients experienced lower risk of death compared to SNF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.92) and similar risk of hospital readmission compared to SNF patients (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89, 1.31) and SHH patients (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). COVID-19-negative ECH patients compared to matched SNF patients were more likely to readmit (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02, 1.65) with no significant difference in risk of mortality (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.44, 1.18).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ECH had similar or improved outcomes relative to SNF and SHH. COVID-19-negative ECH patients experienced higher readmissions relative to SNF. ECH supported patients to return home from the hospital and provided an alternative to an institutional postacute setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"135-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:居家护理(ECH)是一种新型的居家护理模式,它支持患者尽早出院,并提供了一种替代住院治疗后护理的方法:本研究比较了转入 ECH 的住院患者与转入专业护理机构(SNF)和专业家庭医疗服务机构(SHH)的患者的特征、死亡率和再入院结果:对 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 1 月期间从医院转入 ECH、SNF 或 SHH 的患者进行回顾性研究。分析比较了按 COVID-19 感染状态分层的患者特征、30 天死亡率和再入院率。结果采用倾向得分匹配后的逻辑回归进行评估:在 32,132 名符合条件的患者中,6.3% 转至 ECH,39.7% 转至 SNF,54.0% 转至 SHH。匹配后,除年龄外,各组间的所有基线特征均保持平衡。匹配后并调整年龄差异后,ECH 患者的死亡风险低于 SNF 患者(调整赔率比 [AOR] 0.61,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.40,0.92),再入院风险与 SNF 患者(AOR 1.08,95% CI 0.89,1.31)和 SHH 患者(AOR 0.96,95% CI 0.80,1.16)相似。与匹配的 SNF 患者相比,COVID-19 阴性的 ECH 患者更有可能再次入院(AOR 1.30,95% CI 1.02,1.65),但死亡风险无显著差异(AOR 0.72,95% CI 0.44,1.18):与SNF和SHH相比,ECH的疗效相似或更好。与SNF相比,COVID-19阴性的ECH患者再入院率更高。ECH 支持患者从医院返回家中,并为患者提供了一种替代住院治疗后环境的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elevated care at home: An alternative to traditional levels of care

Background

Elevated care at home (ECH) is a novel in-home care model supporting early hospital discharge and providing an alternative to institutional postacute care.

Objectives

This study compares patient characteristics, mortality, and readmission outcomes of hospitalized patients who transitioned to ECH to patients who transitioned to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and skilled home health services (SHH).

Methods

A retrospective study of patients between May 2020 and January 2022 transitioned from the hospital to ECH, SNF, or SHH. The analysis compared patient characteristics, 30-day mortality, and readmission stratified by COVID-19 infection status. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression after propensity score matching.

Results

Of 32,132 eligible patients, 6.3% were transitioned to ECH, 39.7% to SNF, and 54.0% to SHH. After matching, all baseline characteristics except for age were balanced between groups. Postmatch and adjusting for age differences, ECH patients experienced lower risk of death compared to SNF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.92) and similar risk of hospital readmission compared to SNF patients (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89, 1.31) and SHH patients (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). COVID-19-negative ECH patients compared to matched SNF patients were more likely to readmit (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02, 1.65) with no significant difference in risk of mortality (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.44, 1.18).

Conclusions

ECH had similar or improved outcomes relative to SNF and SHH. COVID-19-negative ECH patients experienced higher readmissions relative to SNF. ECH supported patients to return home from the hospital and provided an alternative to an institutional postacute setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信